June 27, 2026

The End of Data Entry: Why Your Business Logic is Moving to Agents

The End of Data Entry: Why Your Business Logic is Moving to Agents
The End of Data Entry: Why Your Business Logic is Moving to Agents
M365 FM Podcast
The End of Data Entry: Why Your Business Logic is Moving to Agents

In this episode of M365.FM, we explore why traditional data entry is rapidly disappearing and how AI agents are transforming business applications. Instead of asking employees to manually enter information into forms and systems, organizations are moving toward conversational interfaces where users simply describe what they want to achieve while AI agents translate intent into business actions.

The discussion explains that the real shift is not replacing forms with chat, but relocating business logic from user interfaces into intelligent, governed agent workflows. Rather than embedding complex validation rules, approvals, and automation inside individual applications, these capabilities become reusable services that agents can orchestrate across multiple systems.

A major theme is the importance of separating reasoning from execution. AI agents interpret user intent, while trusted business workflows execute actions in a secure, auditable, and deterministic way. This architecture improves governance, reduces errors, and creates consistent business processes without giving AI unrestricted access to enterprise systems.

The episode also highlights how Microsoft technologies such as Copilot Studio, Azure Logic Apps, and the Model Context Protocol (MCP) enable organizations to build scalable agent ecosystems instead of isolated chatbots. Business capabilities become reusable tools with defined ownership, monitoring, testing, and lifecycle management.

Ultimately, the future of enterprise software isn't about replacing people with AI—it’s about eliminating repetitive data entry, reducing manual coordination between systems, and allowing employees to focus on higher-value work while AI agents execute business processes safely, transparently, and at scale.

Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconYoutube Music podcast player iconSpreaker podcast player iconPodchaser podcast player iconAmazon Music podcast player icon

You now face the end of data entry as artificial intelligence transforms how you operate. Manual processes no longer keep up with business demands. Error rates can reach 4% and scaling requires more staff, making growth expensive and risky. Agentic AI now processes thousands of documents per hour with fewer errors, even handling unstructured information. The shift from systems of record to systems of action means you gain real-time insights and faster results. This change gives you a clear path to improved efficiency and smarter decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Embrace agentic AI to eliminate manual data entry and boost productivity by 20-30%.
  • Reduce human error in data handling, leading to more accurate analytics and better decision-making.
  • Break down data silos by integrating systems, allowing for seamless data flow across your organization.
  • Automate repetitive tasks to free up employee time for high-value work, enhancing overall efficiency.
  • Utilize real-time decision-making capabilities of AI agents to respond quickly to business changes.
  • Build trust in AI by ensuring transparency and consistent results in decision-making processes.
  • Start small with low-risk projects to gain confidence before scaling agentic workflows across your business.
  • Measure success through clear metrics like cost savings and improved customer satisfaction to track the impact of AI adoption.

The End of Data Entry and Its Impact

Why Manual Processes Fail

Productivity Loss

You see the end of data entry as a turning point for your business. Manual processes slow you down. Over 40% of workers spend at least a quarter of their week on repetitive tasks like entering information into a CRM. This time could go toward building relationships or analyzing enterprise data. When you rely on manual entry, you create bottlenecks that delay customer service and decision-making. Your teams wait for updates, and your analytics become outdated before you can act. The end of data entry means you reclaim hours every week, allowing your staff to focus on high-value work.

Manual data entry also drains your resources. You need more employees to handle growing volumes of enterprise data. As your business scales, these costs rise quickly. Automation changes this equation. Companies that adopt agentic AI report productivity gains of 20% to 30%. You can reallocate your resources to improve internal processes and invest in technology that drives growth. The end of data entry is not just about saving time; it is about transforming how you use your workforce.

Human Error

Manual data entry introduces errors that ripple through your organization. Fatigue and loss of focus lead to mistakes, such as incorrect contact numbers or invoice mismatches in your CRM. Even a 1% error rate can cause significant downstream issues. These errors disrupt supply chain operations, create confusion in marketing campaigns, and result in unreliable reports. Handling sensitive enterprise data manually increases the risk of data loss and unauthorized sharing. You face hidden costs from correcting mistakes and managing compliance risks. The end of data entry reduces these risks, giving you more accurate analytics and stronger data governance.

Cost and Efficiency Drivers

Operational Friction

Manual processes create friction across your enterprise. You experience delays in processing, especially in time-sensitive sectors like lending or procurement. Each step that requires human intervention adds to your total cost of ownership. Employee turnover becomes expensive, with replacement costs reaching up to 33% of annual salary. As you add more staff to manage enterprise data, your operational costs become unpredictable. Automation with agentic AI offers predictable costs and faster processing. Some organizations achieve ROI in just two weeks after implementing agentic automation. You can reduce labor costs by up to 40%, freeing up capital for innovation.

Note: Automating resource-heavy processes allows you to reinvest in growth and technology, rather than spending on repetitive tasks.

Data Silos

Manual data entry often leads to data silos. Different teams use separate CRMs or spreadsheets, making it hard to share enterprise data. Disorganized information causes confusion and delays. Your analytics suffer because you cannot access a unified view of your business. Data silos also increase compliance risks, as over 50% of professionals report costly errors and regulatory issues from manual entry. The end of data entry means you break down these barriers. Agentic AI integrates your CRM, customer relationship management, and analytics platforms, creating a seamless flow of enterprise data.

Cost DriverDescription
High costs of manual data entryManual entry increases TCO and complicates budgeting.
Employee turnoverReplacing staff adds long-term expenses.
Delays in processingMissed opportunities in time-sensitive sectors.
Compliance risksManual errors lead to costly compliance issues.
Increased operational costsMore employees needed for high data volumes.
Scalability challengesManual processes are hard to scale; automation offers predictable costs.

The vision of M365 FM centers on moving from systems of record to systems of action. You no longer just store enterprise data; you use intelligent agents that understand your business context and automate complex workflows. Modern platforms like M365 FM’s AI Agents transform your CRM from a passive database into an active system that drives results. These agents gather enterprise data, analyze it in real time, and act on your behalf. You gain a smarter, more responsive enterprise that adapts to your needs.

The end of data entry is not a distant goal. It is happening now. By embracing agentic AI, you unlock the full potential of your enterprise data, improve analytics automation, and position your business for the future.

Rise of Agentic Workflows in Business

Rise of Agentic Workflows in Business

What Are Agentic Workflows

Agentic workflows change how you manage business processes. These workflows use ai to think, adapt, and improve in real time. You can picture them as smart teammates that help you handle complex tasks. Unlike traditional systems, agentic workflows use reasoning, memory, and tools to adjust to new situations. This flexibility makes your business more reliable and responsive in a fast-changing world.

Continuous Context Gathering

Agentic workflows gather context from your data at every step. They do not just follow a script. Instead, they observe what is happening in your business and collect information from multiple sources. For example, an ai agent can monitor customer emails, sales records, and support tickets all at once. This continuous context gathering helps you make better decisions because you always have the latest data. You do not need to worry about missing important updates or working with outdated information.

Autonomous Action

Once agentic workflows understand the context, they take action on their own. You do not have to guide every step. These agents can complete tasks like qualifying leads, reconciling accounts, or reviewing contracts without constant supervision. For instance, a Recruitment Assistant Agent can screen candidates, schedule interviews, and send updates to applicants. This autonomy frees your team to focus on strategy and creative work.

Agentic AI vs. Traditional Automation

Agentic ai brings a new level of intelligence to your business. You might wonder how it differs from the automation you already know. The table below highlights the key differences:

AspectTraditional WorkflowAgentic Workflow
How it worksFollows fixed rules and stepsUnderstands the goal, plans steps, and adapts actions
FlexibilityLimited — can’t handle unexpected changes wellHighly flexible — adjusts to new information or conditions
Decision-makingPredefined and rigidDynamic — the system reasons and decides the best next step
Human involvementNeeds constant oversight and updatesRuns independently, with humans guiding the overall goal
Best forRepetitive, predictable tasksComplex, changing, or unpredictable tasks

Integration of Business Logic

Agentic ai integrates your business logic directly into the workflow. You do not need to build separate rules for every scenario. These agents learn from your data and adapt to your business needs. For example, a Contract Review Agent can scan legal documents, check for compliance, and suggest changes based on your company’s standards. This approach saves you time and reduces errors.

Real-Time Decision-Making

With agentic workflows, you get real-time decision-making. The ai uses machine learning to analyze data as it arrives. It can spot trends, flag risks, and recommend actions without delay. For example, an IT Support Agent can resolve password issues or answer common questions instantly. This speed improves your customer service and keeps your operations running smoothly.

Tip: Agentic workflows help you scale your business. You can handle more data, serve more customers, and respond to changes faster than ever before.

Practical Applications of Agentic AI Agents

You can see the power of agentic workflows in real business scenarios. Here are some ways M365 FM’s ai agents help companies every day:

  • Recruitment Assistant Agent automates candidate screening, interview scheduling, and communication.
  • IT Support Agent answers troubleshooting questions and manages password resets, reducing support tickets.
  • Contract Review Agent scans legal documents for compliance and recommends standard language.

These ai applications show how agentic workflows transform your daily operations. You move from manual data entry to intelligent systems that act on your behalf.

Improving Business Outcomes with Agentic Workflows

Agentic workflows deliver real results. Companies that use these systems scale faster and manage more data with less effort. Leaders track key performance indicators and set clear roadmaps to measure impact. Cross-team governance and ongoing risk management keep your workflows secure and reliable. Agents combine planning, memory, and action, using the right tools for each job. Human oversight ensures that ai agents follow your goals and maintain high standards.

You gain a smarter, more adaptive business. Agentic workflows let you focus on growth, innovation, and customer satisfaction.

Building Trust in AI Agents

Transparency and Reliability

Explainable Outcomes

You need to trust that ai agents make decisions you can understand. When you see how agents reach their conclusions, you feel more confident in their actions. Many organizations use best practices to ensure explainable outcomes.

  • Fairness and debiasing help you manage and monitor fairness in your ai-ready data.
  • Model drift mitigation lets you analyze models and receive alerts when outcomes change.
  • Model risk management quantifies risks and explains what happens when deviations persist.
  • Lifecycle automation unifies tools and processes, so you can monitor models and share outcomes.
  • Multicloud-readiness allows you to deploy ai projects across different environments, promoting trust and confidence.

You also benefit from continuous validation frameworks and robust API management. Vendors keep models updated, and regulatory controls prevent prompt and model drift. Clear outcomes and key performance indicators guide you at every phase. These practices support strong governance and help you understand how agents use business context to make decisions.

Consistent Results

You expect agents to deliver reliable results every time. Research shows that trust is a multidimensional construct, essential for the acceptance of ai agents.

  1. Affective trust, cognitive trust, and overall trust are critical for user acceptance.
  2. Overall trust has the strongest impact on your willingness to use ai agents.
  3. Users with higher ethical expectations are more likely to adopt ai agents, emphasizing the need for transparency.

Consistent results build your confidence in ai-ready data and reinforce governance. When agents perform as expected, you rely on them to handle business context and support your operations.

Contextual Intelligence

Adapting to Business Rules

Agents must adapt to your business context and follow your rules. Contextual intelligence improves performance by providing tailored insights across departments. You see enhanced decision quality and speed, which leads to better operational efficiency. Unifying data quality checks and scenario modeling reduces errors and compresses time-to-insight. Automation of KPI monitoring can cut manual reporting hours by 30-50%, freeing up your team for strategic work.

Evidence DescriptionImpact on Performance
AI agents provide tailored insights across departments.Enhances decision quality and speed, leading to better operational efficiency.
Unifying data quality checks and scenario modeling reduces errors.Compresses time-to-insight, improving the quality of decisions made by leaders.
Automating KPI monitoring can cut manual reporting hours by 30-50%.Frees up team resources for strategic work, increasing overall productivity.
AI agents analyze trends and detect risks in real-time.Allows teams to focus on actionable insights rather than data gathering, improving decision-making speed.
Agents recommend data-backed courses of action based on multiple data sources.Reduces guesswork and standardizes decision-making across the organization, enhancing overall performance.

Handling Complex Scenarios

You face challenges when agents adapt to complex business rules and scenarios. Integration with legacy systems can be difficult, as these systems often seem reliable and resistant to change. Access to high-quality, domain-specific data is crucial for training ai agents, but sensitive industries may restrict data access. Outdated data can lead to inaccuracies. User adoption and change management require you to address concerns about data privacy and unclear decision-making processes. Non-technical users may find complex ai systems overwhelming, leading to low engagement. Security and compliance risks include threats like adversarial attacks and data leaks, which complicate deployment and integration.

Tip: You build trust in ai agents by focusing on transparency, reliability, and contextual intelligence. Strong governance and ai-ready data help agents adapt to your business context and deliver consistent results.

Evolution of Business Logic

From Apps to Agents

Disposable Application Layers

You have seen business applications change over time. In the past, companies built layers of apps to manage tasks like customer service, logistics, and decision support. These layers often became outdated quickly. You needed to replace or update them as your needs changed. Now, you see a shift. The application layer is shrinking. Experts note that business applications will collapse in the agent era, with business logic moving directly into agents. This change reduces the number of apps you need and makes your systems easier to manage.

SourceEvidence
Nadella, 2024Business applications will collapse in the agent era, with business logic migrating to agents.
McDermott, 2025Traditional application stacks will collapse, reducing the number of apps used by customers.
Bain & Company, 2025The application layer is being squeezed between the data substrate and the intelligence/agent layer.

You can see this trend in real-world examples:

  • AI agents now handle over 70% of customer service inquiries at Vodafone, cutting resolution time by almost half.
  • A logistics company reduced error rates by 83% after switching to agent-based shipment documentation.
  • Investment firms use agent-based systems to improve returns and manage risk.

Embedded Logic in Agents

Today, you embed business logic directly into AI agents. These agents use data from across your organization to make decisions and take action. You no longer need to maintain separate rules in each app. Instead, agents learn and adapt as your business grows. For example, a Business Process AI Agent can unify systems, process documents, and make context-aware decisions. This approach increases accuracy and reduces manual work. You gain a flexible system that evolves with your needs.

Systems of Action

Dynamic Process Management

You move from systems of record to systems of action. A system of record stores important company data and ensures consistency. A system of action automates workflows and provides real-time data for decision-making. This shift lets you automate daily processes and improve communication across teams.

AspectSystem of Record (SoR)System of Action (SoA)
DefinitionShared reference point for business recordsPlatform for automating data and workflows
PurposeStore records and ensure consistencyAutomate workflows and provide real-time data
UsageDocument management and complianceReal-time decision-making and better communication
FocusMaintaining and organizing recordsAutomating processes and enhancing collaboration

With dynamic process management, you can respond quickly to changes. For example, a multinational logistics company unified its systems with a Business Process AI Agent. This agent improved document accuracy, reduced manual entry, and gave teams real-time visibility. You benefit from end-to-end automation, faster decisions, and better compliance.

Continuous Improvement

Agentic orchestration allows your business logic to evolve. AI agents learn from new data and improve over time. You see continuous improvement in accuracy, speed, and efficiency. As agents handle more tasks, you can focus on strategy and growth. This cycle of learning and adaptation keeps your business competitive in a changing world.

Transforming Operations with AI Agents

Transforming Operations with AI Agents

Legacy Systems and Migration

Preserving Business Logic

You may worry about losing important business rules when you move from legacy systems to agentic workflows. To keep your business logic safe, you should focus on modularity. This means you break down your processes into smaller parts that you can update as your needs change. You also need to keep humans involved as orchestrators. They help make sure your workflows match your goals. Deep collaboration between your engineering and business teams helps you adapt quickly and share ownership of your workflows. Small, autonomous teams work best when building agentic systems. Including people who know your business ensures that your new workflows fit your daily operations.

Integrating with Agentic Workflows

Migrating from old systems to agentic workflows brings challenges. You may face messy or incomplete data, which can cause poor decisions by ai agents. Older systems may not connect easily with new ai workflows. Employees may worry about job loss, which can slow adoption. The table below shows common challenges and solutions:

ChallengeDescriptionSolution
Data Quality ProblemsMessy, outdated, or incomplete data can lead to poor decision-making.Use strong data checks and automated tools to keep data accurate.
Integration with Old SystemsOlder systems may not connect with new ai workflows.Use integration tools or custom connectors to bridge old and new systems.
Building Trust and AdoptionEmployees may fear job loss, causing resistance.Show that agents help productivity, not replace jobs, to ease concerns.

You can use integration tools or middleware to connect your old systems with new agentic workflows. Automated data quality management tools help you keep your data clean and reliable. When you show your team that agents support their work, you build trust and encourage adoption.

Human-AI Collaboration

Oversight and Training

You need strong oversight and training when you add ai agents to your business. Good governance means you set clear rules for managing risk and compliance. Start with small, low-risk projects to build confidence before you scale up. Involve humans at key checkpoints to keep accountability in your ai processes. Ongoing monitoring and updates help you keep your systems effective and ethical. The table below lists best practices for oversight and training:

Best PracticeDescription
Governance RequirementsSet up clear rules for oversight, compliance, and risk management.
Start Small, Grow BigBegin with low-risk use cases, then expand as you gain confidence.
Human-in-the-loop PracticesInvolve humans at key steps for accountability and oversight.
Continuous MonitoringKeep checking and updating systems to maintain standards.

You should embed agents into defined workflows with clear rules for inputs and outputs. Formal human review at important steps helps you manage risk and reliability. Define how much freedom your ai agents have, and set guardrails for safe operation.

Change Management

You must guide your team through change when you introduce ai agents. Show them how agents act as assistants, not replacements. This helps reduce fear and builds trust. Human-AI collaboration brings real value to your business. For example, customer service teams see a 25% drop in administrative costs and a 30% rise in satisfaction scores. Financial institutions process loans 40% faster and cut fraud by half. Retailers increase conversion rates by 45% and improve customer retention by 30%. When you support your team and provide training, you help everyone succeed with new technology.

Tip: Focus on clear communication and ongoing support to make your transition to agentic workflows smooth and effective.

Action Steps for Leaders

Assessing Readiness

You need a clear plan before you bring agentic solutions into your business. Start by evaluating your current decision-making structures and risk management protocols. Forming an ethics committee can help you oversee new projects and set standards for responsible use. The ASCEND framework offers a structured way to assess your readiness for this transformation. Use tools that check your data infrastructure and workforce skills.

  • Review your technical readiness by looking at your existing data and how much you already automate tasks.
  • Make sure you have a strong governance framework for ai.
  • Check if you use RPA or BPM platforms.
  • Confirm that your data infrastructure supports real-time pipelines and APIs.
  • Identify where your IT team may need new skills.

Identifying Use Cases

You should focus on workflows that are manual, repetitive, and require many decisions. Look for processes that involve multiple systems or teams. Engage with experts in your company to find informal business processes that depend on human judgment.

  1. Target high-volume, repetitive decisions.
  2. Make sure you have access to rich data sources.
  3. Choose areas where you can measure success clearly.

Start with problems that happen often, require a lot of data, and where ai can save time or improve accuracy.

Business leaders often see quick wins in customer service automation, supply chain optimization, and financial processing. These areas show value fast and build confidence in agentic solutions.

Building an Adoption Roadmap

Create a step-by-step plan for rolling out agentic workflows. Begin with a pilot in one department. Use feedback to refine your approach. Involve both technical and business teams to ensure alignment. Set milestones for integrating data, training staff, and measuring early results.

  • Define clear goals for each phase.
  • Assign roles for oversight and support.
  • Plan for ongoing training and communication.

Measuring Success

ROI and Growth

You must track the impact of agentic solutions using both numbers and user feedback. Connect your metrics to financial outcomes like cost savings, risk reduction, and revenue growth. Companies using agentic ai report faster ROI, sometimes in just weeks. Many see a 57% increase in customer service capacity and a 33% higher deflection rate. Average resolution costs drop by more than 20%.

Scaling Agentic Solutions

As you expand agentic workflows, you will face new challenges. You may need to redesign workflows, update how you measure performance, and strengthen governance. Compute requirements can rise quickly, so plan your infrastructure carefully. Make sure your teams have enough domain knowledge to identify valuable use cases. Stay alert to changing regulations.

ChallengeDescription
Workflow RedesignRethink which decisions can be automated and how to handle exceptions.
Metrics and MeasurementAdd new ways to measure decision quality and customer satisfaction.
Security and GovernanceEnsure compliance as ai systems act more independently.
Compute RequirementsPrepare for higher demand on your infrastructure.
Insufficient Domain KnowledgeInvolve experts to find the best opportunities for automation.
Regulatory ComplianceMonitor and adapt to evolving rules for ai in your industry.

Tip: Use a mix of quantitative and qualitative metrics to understand the full impact of agentic solutions on your business.

By following these steps, you can unlock the value of your data, drive growth, and future-proof your organization.


You now see the end of manual data entry as a turning point. Agentic workflows powered by ai give you a clear edge. Early adopters report faster growth and better customer experiences. The table below shows how companies gain a competitive advantage:

DescriptionPercentage
Believe AI agents give an edge73%
Confident in AI agent strategy75%
Early adopters see positive ROI88%

Bar chart showing percentages of business respondents and companies reporting competitive advantages and outcomes from AI agent adoption.

Start by identifying key workflows and build a roadmap for adoption. Embrace this change as a chance to future-proof your business and lead your industry.

FAQ

What is an AI Agent in business operations?

An AI Agent is a digital assistant that observes your data, understands your goals, and takes action. You can use it to automate tasks, make decisions, and improve efficiency across your organization.

How do agentic workflows differ from traditional automation?

Agentic workflows adapt to changes and learn from new data. Traditional automation follows fixed rules. You get more flexibility and smarter decisions with agentic workflows.

Can AI Agents work with my existing systems?

Yes. You can integrate AI Agents with your current tools and databases. Many platforms, like M365 FM, offer connectors and APIs for smooth integration.

Will AI Agents replace my team?

No. AI Agents support your team by handling repetitive tasks. You can focus on strategy, creativity, and customer relationships while agents manage routine work.

How do I measure the success of agentic automation?

You should track key metrics like cost savings, error reduction, and faster processing times. User feedback and improved customer satisfaction also show success.

Is my data safe with AI Agents?

You control your data. Leading platforms use strong security, access controls, and compliance standards. You can set permissions and monitor agent activity.

What are the first steps to adopt agentic workflows?

Start by identifying repetitive tasks and high-impact processes. Build a roadmap, involve your team, and choose a trusted platform like M365 FM to guide your transition.

🚀 Want to be part of m365.fm?

Then stop just listening… and start showing up.

👉 Connect with me on LinkedIn and let’s make something happen:

  • 🎙️ Be a podcast guest and share your story
  • 🎧 Host your own episode (yes, seriously)
  • 💡 Pitch topics the community actually wants to hear
  • 🌍 Build your personal brand in the Microsoft 365 space

This isn’t just a podcast — it’s a platform for people who take action.

🔥 Most people wait. The best ones don’t.

👉 Connect with me on LinkedIn and send me a message:
"I want in"

Let’s build something awesome 👊

1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,800
Enterprise Software has one job for the last 20 years.

2
00:00:02,800 --> 00:00:04,680
We believe that job was storage.

3
00:00:04,680 --> 00:00:07,400
Store the customer record, store the sales opportunity,

4
00:00:07,400 --> 00:00:09,600
store the invoice, store the PO.

5
00:00:09,600 --> 00:00:12,200
We spend billions trying to build a single source of truth

6
00:00:12,200 --> 00:00:13,880
where data was organized and accessible.

7
00:00:13,880 --> 00:00:15,160
We called it a system of record,

8
00:00:15,160 --> 00:00:17,880
but something changed, and nobody announced it.

9
00:00:17,880 --> 00:00:20,480
Your Enterprise Software isn't just storing data anymore.

10
00:00:20,480 --> 00:00:23,280
It's executing processes, it's making decisions,

11
00:00:23,280 --> 00:00:25,120
and it's orchestrating work across systems

12
00:00:25,120 --> 00:00:26,880
that were never designed to talk to each other.

13
00:00:26,880 --> 00:00:28,120
The problem is simple.

14
00:00:28,120 --> 00:00:30,000
We haven't actually shifted how we staff,

15
00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:32,680
how we build, or how we think about what those systems do.

16
00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:35,600
We're still hiring people to be integration layers.

17
00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:37,360
A sales rep reads an email from a prospect

18
00:00:37,360 --> 00:00:39,480
and then spends 20 minutes entering that information

19
00:00:39,480 --> 00:00:43,400
into the CRM because the system can't do it automatically.

20
00:00:43,400 --> 00:00:45,000
A finance controller receives an invoice

21
00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:47,200
and then manually matches it to a purchase order

22
00:00:47,200 --> 00:00:48,320
and a general ledger entry

23
00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:50,840
because three systems can't communicate.

24
00:00:50,840 --> 00:00:53,080
A procurement manager gets an email from a supplier

25
00:00:53,080 --> 00:00:54,560
saying a delivery is delayed,

26
00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:57,040
so they check the warehouse system, update the purchase order

27
00:00:57,040 --> 00:00:59,560
manually and send a notification downstream.

28
00:00:59,560 --> 00:01:01,360
These aren't jobs, they're workarounds.

29
00:01:01,360 --> 00:01:03,560
And the cost isn't just in the time they consume,

30
00:01:03,560 --> 00:01:04,960
it's in the speed they destroy.

31
00:01:04,960 --> 00:01:07,600
A lead takes three days to move from an email inbox

32
00:01:07,600 --> 00:01:09,080
into your sales pipeline

33
00:01:09,080 --> 00:01:11,040
because a human has to be the translator.

34
00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:12,720
A month and close takes five days

35
00:01:12,720 --> 00:01:14,880
because finance teams are matching pennies

36
00:01:14,880 --> 00:01:16,360
instead of analyzing patterns.

37
00:01:16,360 --> 00:01:19,120
A supplier communication takes days instead of seconds

38
00:01:19,120 --> 00:01:21,480
because someone has to read an email, check a system,

39
00:01:21,480 --> 00:01:22,640
and push the update.

40
00:01:22,640 --> 00:01:24,680
This is what happens when you build a system of record

41
00:01:24,680 --> 00:01:25,960
instead of a system of action.

42
00:01:25,960 --> 00:01:27,080
That's changing now.

43
00:01:27,080 --> 00:01:29,960
Not with new features or dashboards, but with agents.

44
00:01:29,960 --> 00:01:33,080
Software that observes, reasons and acts autonomously

45
00:01:33,080 --> 00:01:34,840
within guardrails you define.

46
00:01:34,840 --> 00:01:37,720
These agents are grounded in your actual business data

47
00:01:37,720 --> 00:01:39,680
rather than generic AI knowledge.

48
00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:42,280
They respect your security roles, your approval workflows

49
00:01:42,280 --> 00:01:43,520
and your compliance requirements

50
00:01:43,520 --> 00:01:46,600
while executing the work humans were forced to do manually.

51
00:01:46,600 --> 00:01:48,720
Organizations that move toward agente workflows

52
00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:50,880
now will compress their operational cycles.

53
00:01:50,880 --> 00:01:52,560
Everyone else will fall behind.

54
00:01:52,560 --> 00:01:54,320
The system of record is broken.

55
00:01:54,320 --> 00:01:56,200
20 years ago the promise was clean.

56
00:01:56,200 --> 00:01:58,520
Software would be the single source of truth.

57
00:01:58,520 --> 00:02:00,560
The CRM would store every customer interaction.

58
00:02:00,560 --> 00:02:02,480
The ERP would store every transaction

59
00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:04,880
and we'd finally say goodbye to spreadsheets and guessing.

60
00:02:04,880 --> 00:02:06,440
Data would flow in, get organized

61
00:02:06,440 --> 00:02:08,560
and everyone would have access to the same facts.

62
00:02:08,560 --> 00:02:11,240
It was a good promise, but here's what actually happened.

63
00:02:11,240 --> 00:02:13,920
Data lives in the system, work happens everywhere else.

64
00:02:13,920 --> 00:02:16,160
The invoice gets scanned and stored in the system

65
00:02:16,160 --> 00:02:18,160
but the finance manager works in email

66
00:02:18,160 --> 00:02:20,960
forwarding it to accounting to ask about a discrepancy.

67
00:02:20,960 --> 00:02:23,080
The customer record gets created in the CRM

68
00:02:23,080 --> 00:02:25,000
but the sales rep is working in email

69
00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:27,720
asking for approval from their manager before they reach out.

70
00:02:27,720 --> 00:02:29,440
The PO gets entered into the ERP

71
00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:31,520
but the procurement manager is working in email

72
00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:34,160
negotiating the delivery date directly with the supplier

73
00:02:34,160 --> 00:02:36,200
instead of updating the system first.

74
00:02:36,200 --> 00:02:37,760
The system became a filing cabinet,

75
00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:39,520
a really expensive filing cabinet

76
00:02:39,520 --> 00:02:41,160
and someone has to be the librarian.

77
00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:42,760
That librarian costs money.

78
00:02:42,760 --> 00:02:45,240
A typical enterprise sales rep spends two hours a day

79
00:02:45,240 --> 00:02:48,160
entering data that the system could capture automatically

80
00:02:48,160 --> 00:02:51,400
like a lead from LinkedIn, a conversation note from a call

81
00:02:51,400 --> 00:02:53,320
or an email attachment with a proposal.

82
00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:57,320
Two hours every day at roughly $150,000 a year fully loaded

83
00:02:57,320 --> 00:03:00,640
that $75,000 a year per rep just to be a manual data relay

84
00:03:00,640 --> 00:03:01,800
between systems.

85
00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:03,800
Multiply that across a sales team of 50.

86
00:03:03,800 --> 00:03:07,160
That's $3.75 million a year in pure integration tax

87
00:03:07,160 --> 00:03:09,080
but the real cost isn't the salary.

88
00:03:09,080 --> 00:03:10,080
It's the speed.

89
00:03:10,080 --> 00:03:14,480
A lead arrives as an email and a human has to read it

90
00:03:14,480 --> 00:03:17,000
and rich it, score it and enter it into the CRM.

91
00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:19,240
That's a day, maybe three if the person is busy.

92
00:03:19,240 --> 00:03:20,640
By the time it hits the rep's desk

93
00:03:20,640 --> 00:03:22,800
the prospect is already called three competitors.

94
00:03:22,800 --> 00:03:25,840
A supplier sends an email saying they can't deliver on time

95
00:03:25,840 --> 00:03:28,080
so a human has to read it, check the warehouse,

96
00:03:28,080 --> 00:03:30,360
understand the impact and update the purchase order.

97
00:03:30,360 --> 00:03:32,360
While they're doing that, production is still scheduled

98
00:03:32,360 --> 00:03:34,320
based on outdated information.

99
00:03:34,320 --> 00:03:36,360
A customer calls with a billing question

100
00:03:36,360 --> 00:03:38,560
and the support agent roots it based on the subject line

101
00:03:38,560 --> 00:03:41,360
instead of context so it bounces between three departments

102
00:03:41,360 --> 00:03:44,240
before anyone figures out the real issue is a contract renewal

103
00:03:44,240 --> 00:03:45,720
that's about to expire.

104
00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:48,000
The system stores the data but humans move it

105
00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:49,080
and humans are slow.

106
00:03:50,000 --> 00:03:52,560
This model is breaking now because AI can do what humans

107
00:03:52,560 --> 00:03:54,240
have been doing, observe, reason and act

108
00:03:54,240 --> 00:03:56,080
but without the delay, without the error

109
00:03:56,080 --> 00:03:57,280
and without the cost.

110
00:03:57,280 --> 00:04:00,560
Not chatbots, not generic LLMs trained on the internet

111
00:04:00,560 --> 00:04:03,160
but agents grounded in your actual business data

112
00:04:03,160 --> 00:04:04,960
constrained by your security roles

113
00:04:04,960 --> 00:04:07,160
and orchestrated through your existing systems.

114
00:04:07,160 --> 00:04:09,400
The shift from system of record to system of action

115
00:04:09,400 --> 00:04:10,240
isn't coming.

116
00:04:10,240 --> 00:04:11,200
It's already here.

117
00:04:11,200 --> 00:04:12,760
The agent shift explained.

118
00:04:12,760 --> 00:04:14,120
There's a fundamentally different way

119
00:04:14,120 --> 00:04:16,440
to build what enterprise software actually does.

120
00:04:16,440 --> 00:04:18,440
Most applications are just storage layers.

121
00:04:18,440 --> 00:04:19,960
You move data in, you move data

122
00:04:19,960 --> 00:04:21,840
out but imagine software that actually

123
00:04:21,840 --> 00:04:23,040
participates in the work.

124
00:04:23,040 --> 00:04:25,080
It observes what is happening in real time.

125
00:04:25,080 --> 00:04:27,680
It reads an incoming email and understands the meaning.

126
00:04:27,680 --> 00:04:29,320
It pulls context from your systems

127
00:04:29,320 --> 00:04:31,640
and makes a decision about what happens next.

128
00:04:31,640 --> 00:04:32,800
Then it takes action.

129
00:04:32,800 --> 00:04:34,800
All of this happens without asking for permission

130
00:04:34,800 --> 00:04:35,880
at every single step.

131
00:04:35,880 --> 00:04:37,120
That is what a gentick means.

132
00:04:37,120 --> 00:04:38,640
It is not sentient or creative.

133
00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:40,840
It is not replacing your strategic thinking.

134
00:04:40,840 --> 00:04:43,840
An agent is software designed for a specific business workflow.

135
00:04:43,840 --> 00:04:46,760
It perceives an event, reasons about it using your data

136
00:04:46,760 --> 00:04:48,760
and orchestrates actions across your systems.

137
00:04:48,760 --> 00:04:50,480
It is autonomous within guardrails.

138
00:04:50,480 --> 00:04:52,240
It is deterministic within boundaries.

139
00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:55,520
Every agentic workflow follows the same three-part pattern.

140
00:04:55,520 --> 00:04:57,200
First, an event happens.

141
00:04:57,200 --> 00:04:59,800
A prospect sends an email to your company mailbox.

142
00:04:59,800 --> 00:05:01,360
A supplier sends a purchase order.

143
00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:02,800
A customer opens a support ticket.

144
00:05:02,800 --> 00:05:04,760
These are real events happening right now.

145
00:05:04,760 --> 00:05:05,800
The event is the trigger.

146
00:05:05,800 --> 00:05:07,600
Second, the agent reasons about it.

147
00:05:07,600 --> 00:05:08,720
It pulls context.

148
00:05:08,720 --> 00:05:10,600
For a sales prospect, the agent queries

149
00:05:10,600 --> 00:05:12,680
your data verse to see if this company has talked to you

150
00:05:12,680 --> 00:05:13,400
before.

151
00:05:13,400 --> 00:05:15,800
It checks linked in to see their size and funding.

152
00:05:15,800 --> 00:05:17,640
It compares them against your history

153
00:05:17,640 --> 00:05:20,400
to see if they are a genuine opportunity or just a tire

154
00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:20,960
kicker.

155
00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:22,720
For a purchase order, it checks your inventory

156
00:05:22,720 --> 00:05:23,960
and your contract terms.

157
00:05:23,960 --> 00:05:26,280
For a support ticket, it pulls the full history

158
00:05:26,280 --> 00:05:27,920
and payment record.

159
00:05:27,920 --> 00:05:29,920
The reasoning layer answers one question.

160
00:05:29,920 --> 00:05:31,960
What is actually happening here?

161
00:05:31,960 --> 00:05:33,920
Third, the agent orchestrates actions.

162
00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:35,640
It does not just auto-qualify a prospect.

163
00:05:35,640 --> 00:05:38,480
Instead, it prepares intelligence so your sales rep

164
00:05:38,480 --> 00:05:40,760
can make a smart decision in seconds.

165
00:05:40,760 --> 00:05:43,160
For an incoming PO, it flags discrepancies

166
00:05:43,160 --> 00:05:44,520
before they hit your system.

167
00:05:44,520 --> 00:05:46,480
For a support ticket, it roots the customer

168
00:05:46,480 --> 00:05:48,760
to the right team with the context already loaded.

169
00:05:48,760 --> 00:05:51,080
For month and close, it identifies exceptions

170
00:05:51,080 --> 00:05:53,320
and only escalates the ones that need a human.

171
00:05:53,320 --> 00:05:54,800
The reason this works is data verse.

172
00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:57,320
Your agents do not operate on generic AI knowledge.

173
00:05:57,320 --> 00:06:00,080
They do not guess, based on what the internet taught them.

174
00:06:00,080 --> 00:06:02,120
They reason using your actual business data.

175
00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:04,800
This includes your customer records, your transaction history,

176
00:06:04,800 --> 00:06:06,440
and your financial policies.

177
00:06:06,440 --> 00:06:09,560
Data verse is the platform underneath Dynamics 365.

178
00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:11,720
It stores your accounts and your invoices.

179
00:06:11,720 --> 00:06:13,360
When an agent queries data verse,

180
00:06:13,360 --> 00:06:17,400
it uses the same authoritative source your users access manually.

181
00:06:17,400 --> 00:06:19,360
The agent knows what your business knows.

182
00:06:19,360 --> 00:06:21,840
And the agent operates within the same security boundaries

183
00:06:21,840 --> 00:06:22,840
your employees do.

184
00:06:22,840 --> 00:06:24,320
This is a critical guardrail.

185
00:06:24,320 --> 00:06:25,960
Agents are not god mode automation.

186
00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:28,080
They do not bypass your approval workflows.

187
00:06:28,080 --> 00:06:29,200
They cannot see data.

188
00:06:29,200 --> 00:06:30,760
They are not authorized to see.

189
00:06:30,760 --> 00:06:33,120
An agent assigned to a sales role can only access

190
00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:34,800
what a sales user can access.

191
00:06:34,800 --> 00:06:37,440
High value decisions still require a human sign off.

192
00:06:37,440 --> 00:06:39,600
Every action is logged and audited.

193
00:06:39,600 --> 00:06:41,240
The agent respects your governance.

194
00:06:41,240 --> 00:06:43,320
The real world impact tells the story.

195
00:06:43,320 --> 00:06:45,320
US Ventures deployed reconciliation agents

196
00:06:45,320 --> 00:06:47,800
and cut their month and close time by 80%.

197
00:06:47,800 --> 00:06:49,720
They moved from five days down to one.

198
00:06:49,720 --> 00:06:51,960
Lifetime products implemented procurement agents

199
00:06:51,960 --> 00:06:54,280
and reduced their workload by 20%.

200
00:06:54,280 --> 00:06:56,520
They handle the same volume with fewer people

201
00:06:56,520 --> 00:06:58,240
because agents handle the routine matching

202
00:06:58,240 --> 00:07:00,000
that used to eat half a buyer's day.

203
00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:01,400
This is not theoretical.

204
00:07:01,400 --> 00:07:02,920
Organizations are seeing these results

205
00:07:02,920 --> 00:07:04,840
because they moved from humans moving data

206
00:07:04,840 --> 00:07:07,120
to software executing the process.

207
00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:09,080
Why generic AI fails in enterprise?

208
00:07:09,080 --> 00:07:10,520
You have probably tested a chatbot.

209
00:07:10,520 --> 00:07:12,360
You asked it about a product or a policy.

210
00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:13,480
It sounded intelligent.

211
00:07:13,480 --> 00:07:15,040
It gave you a structured answer.

212
00:07:15,040 --> 00:07:16,320
It even cited sources.

213
00:07:16,320 --> 00:07:17,800
Then you asked it for real knowledge.

214
00:07:17,800 --> 00:07:18,720
And it made things up.

215
00:07:18,720 --> 00:07:19,920
That is the chatbot trap.

216
00:07:19,920 --> 00:07:22,120
It reveals the gap between generic AI

217
00:07:22,120 --> 00:07:24,240
and agents grounded in your business.

218
00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:26,920
A model trained on the internet can talk about your business.

219
00:07:26,920 --> 00:07:28,880
It can discuss sales or supply chains,

220
00:07:28,880 --> 00:07:30,360
but it does not understand your business.

221
00:07:30,360 --> 00:07:32,040
It does not know your standard payment term

222
00:07:32,040 --> 00:07:33,960
is net 30 unless you type it in.

223
00:07:33,960 --> 00:07:35,280
It does not know your top customer

224
00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:37,560
has a 15% discount on big orders.

225
00:07:37,560 --> 00:07:39,520
It does not know your approval thresholds

226
00:07:39,520 --> 00:07:41,040
for managers versus directors.

227
00:07:41,040 --> 00:07:43,080
It does not know the nuance of your relationships

228
00:07:43,080 --> 00:07:44,680
or the specifics of your contracts.

229
00:07:44,680 --> 00:07:46,840
More critically, it does not know what actually matters

230
00:07:46,840 --> 00:07:48,160
in your context.

231
00:07:48,160 --> 00:07:50,280
A customer calls about a billing question.

232
00:07:50,280 --> 00:07:52,640
A generic chatbot just roots it to billing.

233
00:07:52,640 --> 00:07:54,880
But a Dynamics 365 agent reads the history.

234
00:07:54,880 --> 00:07:57,080
It sees they have called six times this month.

235
00:07:57,080 --> 00:07:59,000
It realizes the real problem is a contract

236
00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:01,720
about to expire and roots them to account management instead.

237
00:08:01,720 --> 00:08:03,160
The difference is not the AI model.

238
00:08:03,160 --> 00:08:05,080
The difference is whether the system has access

239
00:08:05,080 --> 00:08:06,480
to your actual business context.

240
00:08:06,480 --> 00:08:07,800
This is the context problem.

241
00:08:07,800 --> 00:08:09,160
At scale, it is fatal.

242
00:08:09,160 --> 00:08:11,160
Generic AI has no access to your data.

243
00:08:11,160 --> 00:08:12,800
It cannot check your supplier contracts

244
00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:14,360
or see your approval workflows.

245
00:08:14,360 --> 00:08:15,960
It does not understand your hierarchy.

246
00:08:15,960 --> 00:08:17,640
Every piece of context must be typed

247
00:08:17,640 --> 00:08:19,480
into the conversation in real time.

248
00:08:19,480 --> 00:08:21,880
That means you're either feeding it information manually

249
00:08:21,880 --> 00:08:23,280
or it is operating blind.

250
00:08:23,280 --> 00:08:25,160
There is another gap nobody talks about.

251
00:08:25,160 --> 00:08:26,640
The execution gap.

252
00:08:26,640 --> 00:08:29,560
Chatbots suggest agents execute.

253
00:08:29,560 --> 00:08:32,200
A chatbot can recommend that you create a purchase order,

254
00:08:32,200 --> 00:08:34,560
but it cannot actually create that PO in your ERP.

255
00:08:34,560 --> 00:08:35,800
It cannot root it for approval

256
00:08:35,800 --> 00:08:37,520
or notify your procurement manager.

257
00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:40,240
It suggests next steps and then you have to do the work.

258
00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:43,040
A Dynamics 365 agent does not suggest it executes.

259
00:08:43,040 --> 00:08:44,200
It creates the record.

260
00:08:44,200 --> 00:08:45,280
It roots the workflow.

261
00:08:45,280 --> 00:08:46,200
It logs the action.

262
00:08:46,200 --> 00:08:47,760
The agent is connected to your systems

263
00:08:47,760 --> 00:08:49,520
while the chatbot is disconnected.

264
00:08:49,520 --> 00:08:51,360
Then there is compliance.

265
00:08:51,360 --> 00:08:53,960
Generic AI does not understand your security model.

266
00:08:53,960 --> 00:08:55,400
It does not know that a rep in Denver

267
00:08:55,400 --> 00:08:57,640
should only see opportunities in her territory.

268
00:08:57,640 --> 00:08:59,240
It does not know that finance members

269
00:08:59,240 --> 00:09:01,920
cannot approve payments over $10,000.

270
00:09:01,920 --> 00:09:03,760
It does not understand your data loss policies.

271
00:09:03,760 --> 00:09:06,600
It responds as if all information is equal for everyone.

272
00:09:06,600 --> 00:09:09,080
In regulated industries like healthcare or finance,

273
00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:10,960
that is a massive liability.

274
00:09:10,960 --> 00:09:14,560
Dynamics 365 agents operate inside your security framework.

275
00:09:14,560 --> 00:09:16,720
They are bound by the same roles as your users.

276
00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:18,240
If an agent is in a sales role,

277
00:09:18,240 --> 00:09:20,400
it only acts on what a sales user can see.

278
00:09:20,400 --> 00:09:21,760
Every decision is auditable.

279
00:09:21,760 --> 00:09:23,280
Governance is not an add-on.

280
00:09:23,280 --> 00:09:24,760
It is built into how the agent works.

281
00:09:24,760 --> 00:09:26,720
The cost of getting this wrong is concrete.

282
00:09:26,720 --> 00:09:28,080
A lead gets sent to the wrong rep

283
00:09:28,080 --> 00:09:30,920
because the system did not understand territory rules.

284
00:09:30,920 --> 00:09:32,960
That rep calls a customer they should not touch

285
00:09:32,960 --> 00:09:34,320
and you lose the account.

286
00:09:34,320 --> 00:09:36,320
A payment gets approved that violates your policy

287
00:09:36,320 --> 00:09:38,600
because the chatbot did not check limits.

288
00:09:38,600 --> 00:09:40,840
An employee gets data they are not supposed to see

289
00:09:40,840 --> 00:09:43,000
because the AI did not enforce security.

290
00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:44,160
These are the recurring patterns

291
00:09:44,160 --> 00:09:47,440
when you treat enterprise software like an internet chatbot.

292
00:09:47,440 --> 00:09:50,960
Dynamics 365 agents are different because they are not generic.

293
00:09:50,960 --> 00:09:52,000
They are grounded.

294
00:09:52,000 --> 00:09:54,520
Sales qualification agent, the intent engine.

295
00:09:54,520 --> 00:09:56,200
Let's move from theory into practice.

296
00:09:56,200 --> 00:09:59,080
We'll start with sales because the problem is the most visible

297
00:09:59,080 --> 00:10:00,920
and the agent's impact is immediate.

298
00:10:00,920 --> 00:10:02,920
Here's how sales actually works right now.

299
00:10:02,920 --> 00:10:05,320
A prospect emails your generic company address

300
00:10:05,320 --> 00:10:07,040
or they fill out a form on your website

301
00:10:07,040 --> 00:10:09,160
or they respond to a LinkedIn outreach campaign.

302
00:10:09,160 --> 00:10:11,560
Your sales development team gets a notification.

303
00:10:11,560 --> 00:10:12,360
Then what happens?

304
00:10:12,360 --> 00:10:13,240
They read the email.

305
00:10:13,240 --> 00:10:14,480
They Google the company.

306
00:10:14,480 --> 00:10:17,120
They check if you've worked with this organization before.

307
00:10:17,120 --> 00:10:19,080
They try to figure out if this is a real opportunity

308
00:10:19,080 --> 00:10:20,440
or someone who's just curious.

309
00:10:20,440 --> 00:10:21,720
But here's the problem.

310
00:10:21,720 --> 00:10:22,880
They can't know for certain

311
00:10:22,880 --> 00:10:25,400
so they assume it might be real, which means they chase it.

312
00:10:25,400 --> 00:10:27,280
A sales rep spends four hours on a prospect

313
00:10:27,280 --> 00:10:28,840
who turns out to be a tire kicker.

314
00:10:28,840 --> 00:10:30,320
They do discovery calls.

315
00:10:30,320 --> 00:10:31,840
They put together a proposal

316
00:10:31,840 --> 00:10:33,880
and they check in twice before they realize

317
00:10:33,880 --> 00:10:36,880
this prospect has no budget, no authority and no timeline.

318
00:10:36,880 --> 00:10:39,560
Or worse, they've already committed to a competitor.

319
00:10:39,560 --> 00:10:41,400
The rep just spent four hours on a deal

320
00:10:41,400 --> 00:10:43,400
with a 15% close likelihood

321
00:10:43,400 --> 00:10:44,960
while the three deals in their pipeline

322
00:10:44,960 --> 00:10:48,040
with 70% likelihood are sitting cold

323
00:10:48,040 --> 00:10:51,200
because the rep is busy chasing low probability noise.

324
00:10:51,200 --> 00:10:52,040
That's the flaw.

325
00:10:52,040 --> 00:10:56,280
By the time a rep realizes a lead is low quality,

326
00:10:56,280 --> 00:10:58,360
they've already invested significant time.

327
00:10:58,360 --> 00:11:01,120
They made this judgment call based on incomplete information

328
00:11:01,120 --> 00:11:03,360
because they can only do so much research manually

329
00:11:03,360 --> 00:11:06,320
in the window before they need to decide whether to engage.

330
00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:09,040
A sales qualification agent changes this entirely.

331
00:11:09,040 --> 00:11:09,920
Here's what it does.

332
00:11:09,920 --> 00:11:12,840
It researches the prospect before your rep ever sees them.

333
00:11:12,840 --> 00:11:15,640
It pulls the prospects linked in profile, company size,

334
00:11:15,640 --> 00:11:17,440
funding status, industry classification,

335
00:11:17,440 --> 00:11:18,600
and employee count.

336
00:11:18,600 --> 00:11:20,080
It checks your historical data

337
00:11:20,080 --> 00:11:22,200
to see if you've worked with this company before

338
00:11:22,200 --> 00:11:23,360
and what the outcome was.

339
00:11:23,360 --> 00:11:24,840
It looks at your wind patterns.

340
00:11:24,840 --> 00:11:27,680
You sell enterprise software to mid market tech companies

341
00:11:27,680 --> 00:11:29,480
in the education space.

342
00:11:29,480 --> 00:11:32,320
This prospect is a 200% SaaS company in Edtech.

343
00:11:32,320 --> 00:11:33,160
That's a match.

344
00:11:33,160 --> 00:11:35,360
Or there are 5,000 person manufacturing company

345
00:11:35,360 --> 00:11:36,400
in industrial automation.

346
00:11:36,400 --> 00:11:37,440
That's not your pattern.

347
00:11:37,440 --> 00:11:39,400
It checks previous interactions to see if someone

348
00:11:39,400 --> 00:11:41,680
from your company emailed this person if they responded

349
00:11:41,680 --> 00:11:44,160
or if they ever actually scheduled a call.

350
00:11:44,160 --> 00:11:46,560
The agent scores the lead against all of this context

351
00:11:46,560 --> 00:11:47,400
in seconds.

352
00:11:47,400 --> 00:11:49,360
The lead arrives via email and the agent compares

353
00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:51,360
the prospect against your ideal customer profile,

354
00:11:51,360 --> 00:11:54,360
your historical wind data, and your current account coverage.

355
00:11:54,360 --> 00:11:57,200
Then the agent enriches the lead record in Dynamics 365

356
00:11:57,200 --> 00:11:59,760
with this intelligence and flags it as hot,

357
00:11:59,760 --> 00:12:01,640
research further or pass.

358
00:12:01,640 --> 00:12:02,920
But here's the thing.

359
00:12:02,920 --> 00:12:04,520
The agent doesn't auto-qualify.

360
00:12:04,520 --> 00:12:06,760
It doesn't automatically assign the lead to a rep

361
00:12:06,760 --> 00:12:08,040
and declare it closed.

362
00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:10,200
The qualification decision stays with your team.

363
00:12:10,200 --> 00:12:12,160
What the agent does is prepare intelligence

364
00:12:12,160 --> 00:12:14,600
so your rep makes a smarter decision faster.

365
00:12:14,600 --> 00:12:16,920
Instead of a rep spending four hours on discovery

366
00:12:16,920 --> 00:12:18,440
to realize its low quality,

367
00:12:18,440 --> 00:12:21,160
they spend 10 minutes reviewing what the agent discovered

368
00:12:21,160 --> 00:12:23,880
and deciding to either move forward or pass.

369
00:12:23,880 --> 00:12:25,680
If the agent flagged it as hot,

370
00:12:25,680 --> 00:12:28,840
the rep has context about who this prospect is, what they do,

371
00:12:28,840 --> 00:12:31,440
and whether your company has worked with them before.

372
00:12:31,440 --> 00:12:33,800
If the agent flagged it as research further,

373
00:12:33,800 --> 00:12:35,920
the rep knows what additional information is missing

374
00:12:35,920 --> 00:12:38,080
and where to focus their early conversations.

375
00:12:38,080 --> 00:12:39,400
The outcome is concrete.

376
00:12:39,400 --> 00:12:40,800
Your rep spend time on prospects

377
00:12:40,800 --> 00:12:42,800
with 70% plus conversion likelihood

378
00:12:42,800 --> 00:12:44,480
instead of 15% likelihood.

379
00:12:44,480 --> 00:12:45,880
They get to the first meeting faster

380
00:12:45,880 --> 00:12:48,280
because they're not wasting time on tire kickers.

381
00:12:48,280 --> 00:12:51,200
They walk into that first meeting with context already prepared,

382
00:12:51,200 --> 00:12:54,120
including the prospect's industry, their company size,

383
00:12:54,120 --> 00:12:55,600
and why they reached out.

384
00:12:55,600 --> 00:12:57,520
That changes the conversation immediately.

385
00:12:57,520 --> 00:13:00,080
You're not starting with, so tell me about your business.

386
00:13:00,080 --> 00:13:02,120
You're starting with, I saw that your company

387
00:13:02,120 --> 00:13:04,840
recently raised Series B in the edtech space.

388
00:13:04,840 --> 00:13:07,560
How is that shaping your approach to this problem?

389
00:13:07,560 --> 00:13:09,560
Sales qualification isn't a new concept,

390
00:13:09,560 --> 00:13:12,080
but qualifying at scale using manual research

391
00:13:12,080 --> 00:13:13,360
was always a bottleneck.

392
00:13:13,360 --> 00:13:15,440
The sales qualification agent removes that bottleneck

393
00:13:15,440 --> 00:13:18,040
by doing the research automatically in context

394
00:13:18,040 --> 00:13:19,640
against your actual business data.

395
00:13:19,640 --> 00:13:23,040
That's the power of an agent grounded in dataverse.

396
00:13:23,040 --> 00:13:24,800
Account reconciliation agent,

397
00:13:24,800 --> 00:13:26,160
the autonomous auditor.

398
00:13:26,160 --> 00:13:28,560
Finance teams face a different kind of manual work

399
00:13:28,560 --> 00:13:30,880
and it's where agents deliver the fastest ROI.

400
00:13:30,880 --> 00:13:34,120
Month and close is happening right now in thousands of organizations.

401
00:13:34,120 --> 00:13:35,440
And here's what it looks like.

402
00:13:35,440 --> 00:13:37,640
Accountants and controllers are sitting at their desks,

403
00:13:37,640 --> 00:13:38,920
looking at three windows.

404
00:13:38,920 --> 00:13:41,040
A sub-ledger, a general ledger, and a spreadsheet.

405
00:13:41,040 --> 00:13:43,760
They're matching invoice amounts to purchase order amounts

406
00:13:43,760 --> 00:13:45,560
to general ledger entries.

407
00:13:45,560 --> 00:13:46,920
They're looking for discrepancies.

408
00:13:46,920 --> 00:13:51,320
A $10,000 invoice came in, but the PO says $9,850.

409
00:13:51,320 --> 00:13:51,840
Why?

410
00:13:51,840 --> 00:13:53,640
Wrong GL code, quantity variance,

411
00:13:53,640 --> 00:13:55,520
early payment discount that wasn't applied,

412
00:13:55,520 --> 00:13:57,880
timing difference, they have to investigate.

413
00:13:57,880 --> 00:14:00,120
Then they create a journal entry to adjust the mismatch,

414
00:14:00,120 --> 00:14:01,240
then they move to the next one.

415
00:14:01,240 --> 00:14:02,600
This is the reconciliation tax.

416
00:14:02,600 --> 00:14:04,760
Finance teams spend four days a month on this work

417
00:14:04,760 --> 00:14:07,280
for a team of five people that's 20 days of human effort

418
00:14:07,280 --> 00:14:10,080
per month every month doing work that a machine should be doing.

419
00:14:10,080 --> 00:14:11,320
The human cost is staggering.

420
00:14:11,320 --> 00:14:15,560
You're paying a controller $120,000 a year to find and fix

421
00:14:15,560 --> 00:14:17,480
0.47 discrepancies.

422
00:14:17,480 --> 00:14:18,960
That controller has a finance degree,

423
00:14:18,960 --> 00:14:20,560
they pass the CPA exam,

424
00:14:20,560 --> 00:14:23,520
and they understand audit strategy and risk mitigation.

425
00:14:23,520 --> 00:14:26,280
Instead, they're looking for typos, they're matching numbers.

426
00:14:26,280 --> 00:14:28,480
They're being paid six figures to do data entry work

427
00:14:28,480 --> 00:14:30,440
that should have been automated a decade ago.

428
00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:32,960
But the real cost isn't the salary, it's the speed.

429
00:14:32,960 --> 00:14:34,720
Your month end clause takes five days

430
00:14:34,720 --> 00:14:37,120
because your finance team is stuck in reconciliation.

431
00:14:37,120 --> 00:14:39,160
They can't close the books until every discrepancies

432
00:14:39,160 --> 00:14:41,280
investigated every journal entry is approved,

433
00:14:41,280 --> 00:14:42,920
and every number is confirmed.

434
00:14:42,920 --> 00:14:45,160
That delay means you don't have accurate financials

435
00:14:45,160 --> 00:14:47,080
until the fifth day of the following month.

436
00:14:47,080 --> 00:14:49,320
Your CFO can't report results to the board.

437
00:14:49,320 --> 00:14:52,680
Your finance team can't move to the next month's planning.

438
00:14:52,680 --> 00:14:54,680
Your working capital decisions are delayed

439
00:14:54,680 --> 00:14:57,880
because you don't have clarity on what actually happened last month.

440
00:14:57,880 --> 00:15:00,000
An account reconciliation agent changes this.

441
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:01,000
Here's what it does.

442
00:15:01,000 --> 00:15:03,080
It identifies mismatches automatically.

443
00:15:03,080 --> 00:15:05,840
It doesn't just flag invoice doesn't match PO.

444
00:15:05,840 --> 00:15:08,920
It analyzes the discrepancy and identifies the root cause.

445
00:15:08,920 --> 00:15:10,520
If there's a wrong GL code,

446
00:15:10,520 --> 00:15:12,280
the agent checks the invoice description

447
00:15:12,280 --> 00:15:14,120
against the purchase order specification

448
00:15:14,120 --> 00:15:15,600
and proposes the correction.

449
00:15:15,600 --> 00:15:17,000
If there's a quantity variance,

450
00:15:17,000 --> 00:15:18,440
the agent checks the receiving record

451
00:15:18,440 --> 00:15:20,600
to see if fewer units were actually received.

452
00:15:20,600 --> 00:15:21,840
If there's a timing difference,

453
00:15:21,840 --> 00:15:23,320
the agent checks the invoice date

454
00:15:23,320 --> 00:15:26,120
against the delivery date to determine whether this is a normal lag

455
00:15:26,120 --> 00:15:27,160
or an anomaly.

456
00:15:27,160 --> 00:15:28,440
The month end close starts

457
00:15:28,440 --> 00:15:30,560
and the agent pulls data from your data verse,

458
00:15:30,560 --> 00:15:32,360
including the sub-ledger, the general ledger,

459
00:15:32,360 --> 00:15:35,560
the invoice records, and your vendo master with payment terms.

460
00:15:35,560 --> 00:15:37,840
The agent applies your business rules automatically.

461
00:15:37,840 --> 00:15:41,600
For example, invoices under $500 are reconciled automatically

462
00:15:41,600 --> 00:15:43,520
if the variance is under 2%,

463
00:15:43,520 --> 00:15:46,960
while invoices over $500 require manual review

464
00:15:46,960 --> 00:15:48,600
if the variance exceeds 1%.

465
00:15:48,600 --> 00:15:51,720
The agent runs these rules across your entire invoice population

466
00:15:51,720 --> 00:15:52,920
in seconds.

467
00:15:52,920 --> 00:15:54,000
Then orchestration happens,

468
00:15:54,000 --> 00:15:55,480
the agent creates a draft journal entry

469
00:15:55,480 --> 00:15:56,920
for each exception that identifies.

470
00:15:56,920 --> 00:15:58,400
It doesn't post the entry.

471
00:15:58,400 --> 00:16:00,160
That still requires human approval,

472
00:16:00,160 --> 00:16:02,480
but it prepares the entry with the correct accounts,

473
00:16:02,480 --> 00:16:05,280
the correct amounts, and the reasoning behind the correction.

474
00:16:05,280 --> 00:16:07,120
Your controller reviews the proposed entry,

475
00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:09,080
confirms its correct, and approves it.

476
00:16:09,080 --> 00:16:11,400
That takes 30 seconds instead of 30 minutes.

477
00:16:11,400 --> 00:16:12,840
The agent handles the mechanics,

478
00:16:12,840 --> 00:16:14,280
your controller handles the judgment.

479
00:16:14,280 --> 00:16:16,320
This is the critical difference from a report.

480
00:16:16,320 --> 00:16:18,560
A reconciliation report shows you the problem.

481
00:16:18,560 --> 00:16:21,080
An account reconciliation agent shows you the problem

482
00:16:21,080 --> 00:16:22,520
and proposes the solution.

483
00:16:22,520 --> 00:16:25,880
Invoice 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 does not match PO67892

484
00:16:25,880 --> 00:16:28,400
because the vendor applied a 5% volume discount

485
00:16:28,400 --> 00:16:30,000
per your contract terms.

486
00:16:30,000 --> 00:16:31,480
Proposed journal entry,

487
00:16:31,480 --> 00:16:33,520
debit accounts payable $350,

488
00:16:33,520 --> 00:16:36,200
credit vendor discount expense $350.

489
00:16:36,200 --> 00:16:37,680
The measurable impact is direct.

490
00:16:37,680 --> 00:16:39,960
US Ventures deployed reconciliation agents

491
00:16:39,960 --> 00:16:42,880
and cut their reconciliation cycle by 80%.

492
00:16:42,880 --> 00:16:45,680
Their month and clothes compressed from five days to one day.

493
00:16:45,680 --> 00:16:47,320
That means their financial teams are available

494
00:16:47,320 --> 00:16:49,840
for strategic work instead of reconciliation tax.

495
00:16:49,840 --> 00:16:51,960
That means their CFO has numbers four days earlier.

496
00:16:51,960 --> 00:16:54,760
That means working capital decisions happen faster.

497
00:16:54,760 --> 00:16:56,880
That's not an efficiency gain in some abstract sense.

498
00:16:56,880 --> 00:16:59,560
That's a material change to how fast the business operates.

499
00:16:59,560 --> 00:17:02,360
Customer intent agent, the relationship memory.

500
00:17:02,360 --> 00:17:04,160
Customer support operates on a lie.

501
00:17:04,160 --> 00:17:06,120
The lie is that you know what a customer needs

502
00:17:06,120 --> 00:17:07,600
based on how they describe it.

503
00:17:07,600 --> 00:17:10,280
A customer calls and says, "I have a billing question."

504
00:17:10,280 --> 00:17:11,920
The ticket gets routed to billing.

505
00:17:11,920 --> 00:17:14,480
A customer writes, "I can't access my account."

506
00:17:14,480 --> 00:17:15,560
The ticket goes to IT.

507
00:17:15,560 --> 00:17:17,840
A customer says, "I need to update my contract."

508
00:17:17,840 --> 00:17:18,800
It lands in legal.

509
00:17:18,800 --> 00:17:20,040
The system reads the subject line

510
00:17:20,040 --> 00:17:21,080
and decides where to send it.

511
00:17:21,080 --> 00:17:21,920
But here's the problem.

512
00:17:21,920 --> 00:17:24,680
The customer's subject line isn't the actual issue.

513
00:17:24,680 --> 00:17:27,320
What typically happens is a customer calls about a billing issue

514
00:17:27,320 --> 00:17:29,040
and the billing team pulls up the account.

515
00:17:29,040 --> 00:17:30,360
They see the charges correct.

516
00:17:30,360 --> 00:17:31,600
They explain the policy.

517
00:17:31,600 --> 00:17:32,720
The customer gets frustrated

518
00:17:32,720 --> 00:17:35,440
because they don't actually care about the billing question.

519
00:17:35,440 --> 00:17:38,360
The real issue is their contract renewal is in 90 days.

520
00:17:38,360 --> 00:17:41,400
They're trying to negotiate the price down before they resign.

521
00:17:41,400 --> 00:17:43,320
They brought up billing as a proxy for,

522
00:17:43,320 --> 00:17:46,080
"I'm thinking about leaving unless this gets cheaper."

523
00:17:46,080 --> 00:17:48,640
The billing team has no visibility into that context.

524
00:17:48,640 --> 00:17:49,960
So they solve the wrong problem.

525
00:17:49,960 --> 00:17:52,920
The customer escalates the issue bounces to account management.

526
00:17:52,920 --> 00:17:54,160
By now you've lost two days

527
00:17:54,160 --> 00:17:56,360
and the customer is already comparison shopping.

528
00:17:56,360 --> 00:17:57,720
This is the routing problem.

529
00:17:57,720 --> 00:17:59,040
And it costs more than you think.

530
00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:00,800
The cost isn't just in resolution time.

531
00:18:00,800 --> 00:18:02,040
It's in the customer experience.

532
00:18:02,040 --> 00:18:03,800
The first agent interaction sets the tone

533
00:18:03,800 --> 00:18:05,160
for the entire resolution.

534
00:18:05,160 --> 00:18:06,720
If a customer starts out frustrated

535
00:18:06,720 --> 00:18:08,120
and gets sent to the wrong person,

536
00:18:08,120 --> 00:18:09,560
that frustration compounds.

537
00:18:09,560 --> 00:18:11,280
They have to re-explain the issue.

538
00:18:11,280 --> 00:18:13,040
The new person has to get context.

539
00:18:13,040 --> 00:18:15,080
By the time someone with real authority shows up,

540
00:18:15,080 --> 00:18:17,360
the customer is already thinking about switching vendors.

541
00:18:17,360 --> 00:18:19,600
If that first interaction had gone to the right person

542
00:18:19,600 --> 00:18:21,480
with full context already loaded,

543
00:18:21,480 --> 00:18:22,680
the conversation is different.

544
00:18:22,680 --> 00:18:25,200
It's, "I see your contract renewal is coming up."

545
00:18:25,200 --> 00:18:28,080
Let's talk about what matters to you in the next term.

546
00:18:28,080 --> 00:18:31,200
Instead of, "Wait, you actually needed account management?"

547
00:18:31,200 --> 00:18:32,360
Let me transfer you.

548
00:18:32,360 --> 00:18:35,360
A customer intent agent reads the situation differently.

549
00:18:35,360 --> 00:18:36,880
When a customer initiates contact

550
00:18:36,880 --> 00:18:39,440
and email a phone call, a support portal submission,

551
00:18:39,440 --> 00:18:41,280
the agent doesn't just read the subject line.

552
00:18:41,280 --> 00:18:43,360
It reads the entire interaction history.

553
00:18:43,360 --> 00:18:44,680
What have they called about before?

554
00:18:44,680 --> 00:18:45,760
What patterns do you see?

555
00:18:45,760 --> 00:18:47,400
The agent analyzes email tone.

556
00:18:47,400 --> 00:18:48,240
Is this frustrated?

557
00:18:48,240 --> 00:18:48,880
Curious?

558
00:18:48,880 --> 00:18:50,160
Urgent?

559
00:18:50,160 --> 00:18:51,880
The agent checks contract status.

560
00:18:51,880 --> 00:18:53,480
When does this renewal happen?

561
00:18:53,480 --> 00:18:55,000
What's their payment history?

562
00:18:55,000 --> 00:18:56,680
The agent looks at previous tickets.

563
00:18:56,680 --> 00:18:58,400
Have they called with similar issues?

564
00:18:58,400 --> 00:18:59,760
Did those get resolved?

565
00:18:59,760 --> 00:19:02,360
The agent cross-references open support cases.

566
00:19:02,360 --> 00:19:05,640
Is there an ongoing issue that this call relates to?

567
00:19:05,640 --> 00:19:06,920
The event is straightforward.

568
00:19:06,920 --> 00:19:08,640
Customer initiates contact.

569
00:19:08,640 --> 00:19:10,840
The reasoning phase pulls everything the agent knows

570
00:19:10,840 --> 00:19:12,600
about this customer into context.

571
00:19:12,600 --> 00:19:14,840
The orchestration phase roots them to the right team

572
00:19:14,840 --> 00:19:16,880
with all of that intelligence preloaded.

573
00:19:16,880 --> 00:19:18,760
Account management doesn't get a transfer.

574
00:19:18,760 --> 00:19:19,920
They get a notification.

575
00:19:19,920 --> 00:19:22,200
Customer ABC is calling about a billing question,

576
00:19:22,200 --> 00:19:24,040
but their contract renews in 90 days

577
00:19:24,040 --> 00:19:26,480
and they've been asking about pricing for three weeks.

578
00:19:26,480 --> 00:19:29,400
They're likely exploring alternatives, root to me.

579
00:19:29,400 --> 00:19:30,400
Here's what changes.

580
00:19:30,400 --> 00:19:32,240
The account manager picks up already knowing

581
00:19:32,240 --> 00:19:33,440
this isn't a billing call.

582
00:19:33,440 --> 00:19:35,040
It's a renewal negotiation.

583
00:19:35,040 --> 00:19:36,600
Suddenly, the conversation is strategic

584
00:19:36,600 --> 00:19:37,880
instead of transactional.

585
00:19:37,880 --> 00:19:38,920
The customer feels understood

586
00:19:38,920 --> 00:19:40,880
because the person on the other end already knows

587
00:19:40,880 --> 00:19:41,960
their situation.

588
00:19:41,960 --> 00:19:43,400
You're not starting from scratch.

589
00:19:43,400 --> 00:19:44,840
You're starting from context.

590
00:19:44,840 --> 00:19:47,400
First contact resolution is the metric that matters here.

591
00:19:47,400 --> 00:19:49,600
Instead of a customer getting rooted three times,

592
00:19:49,600 --> 00:19:51,680
they reach the right person on the first contact.

593
00:19:51,680 --> 00:19:52,800
That person has context.

594
00:19:52,800 --> 00:19:54,560
The resolution happens in one conversation.

595
00:19:54,560 --> 00:19:56,120
The customer stays satisfied.

596
00:19:56,120 --> 00:19:58,440
The company avoids the cost and churn risk

597
00:19:58,440 --> 00:19:59,800
of a mis-routed ticket.

598
00:19:59,800 --> 00:20:02,680
This is where the real power of customer intelligence lives.

599
00:20:02,680 --> 00:20:04,720
It's not in knowing what customers say they need.

600
00:20:04,720 --> 00:20:06,720
It's in understanding what they actually need

601
00:20:06,720 --> 00:20:08,600
based on the full relationship history.

602
00:20:08,600 --> 00:20:11,120
A customer intent agent does that automatically.

603
00:20:11,120 --> 00:20:13,680
It makes every first interaction and informed interaction.

604
00:20:13,680 --> 00:20:16,240
And that changes customer outcomes fundamentally.

605
00:20:16,240 --> 00:20:19,760
Supplier communications agent, the supply chain orchestrator,

606
00:20:19,760 --> 00:20:22,240
procurement operates on a fundamentally different cadence

607
00:20:22,240 --> 00:20:23,520
than sales or finance.

608
00:20:23,520 --> 00:20:25,360
You don't get one supplier email a day.

609
00:20:25,360 --> 00:20:27,040
You get 50.

610
00:20:27,040 --> 00:20:28,120
A supplier sends.

611
00:20:28,120 --> 00:20:29,560
We can't deliver on Tuesday.

612
00:20:29,560 --> 00:20:32,160
Friday is the earliest we can ship.

613
00:20:32,160 --> 00:20:33,480
An account sends.

614
00:20:33,480 --> 00:20:36,120
Your PO 45892 has been received.

615
00:20:36,120 --> 00:20:38,440
But we need clarification on the address.

616
00:20:38,440 --> 00:20:40,280
A logistics provider updates you.

617
00:20:40,280 --> 00:20:42,360
Your shipment is delayed due to weather.

618
00:20:42,360 --> 00:20:44,960
A manufacturer confirms we've expedited your order

619
00:20:44,960 --> 00:20:46,800
and it will arrive three days early.

620
00:20:46,800 --> 00:20:49,360
Each of these emails requires the same sequence.

621
00:20:49,360 --> 00:20:51,840
Read it, check the system, understand the impact,

622
00:20:51,840 --> 00:20:54,040
take action, notify downstream teams.

623
00:20:54,040 --> 00:20:55,960
And it happens dozens of times a week.

624
00:20:55,960 --> 00:20:57,320
The communication tax in procurement

625
00:20:57,320 --> 00:20:59,440
is different from the data entry tax in sales.

626
00:20:59,440 --> 00:21:00,880
It's not about volume of records.

627
00:21:00,880 --> 00:21:02,920
It's about the velocity of decision making.

628
00:21:02,920 --> 00:21:05,160
Every supplier email that doesn't get processed

629
00:21:05,160 --> 00:21:07,120
immediately creates a cascading problem.

630
00:21:07,120 --> 00:21:09,240
Your warehouse doesn't know the shipment is delayed

631
00:21:09,240 --> 00:21:11,200
so it schedules receiving incorrectly.

632
00:21:11,200 --> 00:21:13,520
Your production line doesn't know the component order

633
00:21:13,520 --> 00:21:15,400
is expedited so you have double inventory.

634
00:21:15,400 --> 00:21:17,840
Your project doesn't know the material won't arrive on time

635
00:21:17,840 --> 00:21:19,960
so you're still running on the original timeline.

636
00:21:19,960 --> 00:21:22,880
The person doing this work is trapped between two bad options.

637
00:21:22,880 --> 00:21:25,520
If it's a buyer, someone with authority and context,

638
00:21:25,520 --> 00:21:29,480
you're paying $100,000 a year to read emails and update systems.

639
00:21:29,480 --> 00:21:32,320
If it's an admin, someone cheaper without supply chain knowledge,

640
00:21:32,320 --> 00:21:34,040
they're making guesses about impact.

641
00:21:34,040 --> 00:21:35,480
They escalate everything out of caution

642
00:21:35,480 --> 00:21:37,560
because they don't understand the consequences.

643
00:21:37,560 --> 00:21:40,200
A supplier communications agent operates differently.

644
00:21:40,200 --> 00:21:41,360
Here's the mechanism.

645
00:21:41,360 --> 00:21:43,720
An email arrives from a supplier.

646
00:21:43,720 --> 00:21:46,080
Your shipment of component X is delayed by one week

647
00:21:46,080 --> 00:21:48,200
due to quality issues.

648
00:21:48,200 --> 00:21:49,680
The agent reads it.

649
00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:51,000
But it doesn't just log the delay.

650
00:21:51,000 --> 00:21:53,560
It understands what that delay means for your operation.

651
00:21:53,560 --> 00:21:55,000
The event is the email itself.

652
00:21:55,000 --> 00:21:57,200
The reasoning phase is where the intelligence lives.

653
00:21:57,200 --> 00:21:59,800
The agent checks your current inventory of component X.

654
00:21:59,800 --> 00:22:00,960
How much do you have on hand?

655
00:22:00,960 --> 00:22:02,080
What's your consumption rate?

656
00:22:02,080 --> 00:22:04,360
When would you run out if nothing else arrives?

657
00:22:04,360 --> 00:22:06,280
The agent pulls your safety stock policy.

658
00:22:06,280 --> 00:22:09,360
For critical components, you maintain 30 days of supply.

659
00:22:09,360 --> 00:22:12,120
For non-critical items, you're comfortable with 15.

660
00:22:12,120 --> 00:22:14,440
Based on the classification and your current inventory,

661
00:22:14,440 --> 00:22:16,040
how urgent is this delay?

662
00:22:16,040 --> 00:22:17,960
The agent checks your production schedule.

663
00:22:17,960 --> 00:22:20,280
Do you have an active work order that needs component X

664
00:22:20,280 --> 00:22:21,040
in the next week?

665
00:22:21,040 --> 00:22:23,320
Is there a customer commitment that depends on this?

666
00:22:23,320 --> 00:22:25,120
The agent understands impact.

667
00:22:25,120 --> 00:22:26,840
A week delay on a common fastener

668
00:22:26,840 --> 00:22:28,760
affects your production time line slightly.

669
00:22:28,760 --> 00:22:30,880
A week delay on a custom manufactured module

670
00:22:30,880 --> 00:22:33,760
designed for an active customer order is a critical issue.

671
00:22:33,760 --> 00:22:35,200
The agent knows the difference

672
00:22:35,200 --> 00:22:37,560
because it has access to your operational data.

673
00:22:37,560 --> 00:22:38,600
Then orchestration.

674
00:22:38,600 --> 00:22:41,000
The agent updates the PO in your system automatically.

675
00:22:41,000 --> 00:22:43,080
It creates a notification to your warehouse

676
00:22:43,080 --> 00:22:44,840
that this delivery is delayed.

677
00:22:44,840 --> 00:22:47,320
If the delay is non-critical, the component arrives

678
00:22:47,320 --> 00:22:50,320
Thursday instead of Monday, and you have 60 days of supply.

679
00:22:50,320 --> 00:22:51,920
The agent handles it autonomously.

680
00:22:51,920 --> 00:22:52,880
The record is updated.

681
00:22:52,880 --> 00:22:54,200
The warehouse is notified.

682
00:22:54,200 --> 00:22:56,400
The downstream team knows the new arrival date.

683
00:22:56,400 --> 00:22:59,080
If the delay is critical, you have only five days of supply

684
00:22:59,080 --> 00:23:01,120
and component X is needed for an active order.

685
00:23:01,120 --> 00:23:03,240
The agent flags it for immediate escalation.

686
00:23:03,240 --> 00:23:04,880
It goes to your procurement manager

687
00:23:04,880 --> 00:23:06,280
and your operations lead.

688
00:23:06,280 --> 00:23:07,640
The guard rail is precise.

689
00:23:07,640 --> 00:23:09,640
Routine updates happen automatically.

690
00:23:09,640 --> 00:23:11,480
High-risk changes require approval.

691
00:23:11,480 --> 00:23:13,760
A three-day delay on a standardized commodity.

692
00:23:13,760 --> 00:23:14,840
The agent updates it.

693
00:23:14,840 --> 00:23:16,360
A redesign request from a supplier

694
00:23:16,360 --> 00:23:18,080
that changes the specifications.

695
00:23:18,080 --> 00:23:19,440
The agent escalates it.

696
00:23:19,440 --> 00:23:22,400
A price increase that affects your cost model escalated.

697
00:23:22,400 --> 00:23:24,120
An expedited delivery that adds cost

698
00:23:24,120 --> 00:23:27,120
but solves a production problem, escalated with the cost impact

699
00:23:27,120 --> 00:23:28,840
clearly stated so your manager can approve

700
00:23:28,840 --> 00:23:30,280
or decline based on the math.

701
00:23:30,280 --> 00:23:33,200
The outcome is a compression of decision velocity.

702
00:23:33,200 --> 00:23:35,520
Supplier communications that used to take a day or two

703
00:23:35,520 --> 00:23:37,760
to process now happen in seconds.

704
00:23:37,760 --> 00:23:39,480
Your production schedule stays synchronized

705
00:23:39,480 --> 00:23:41,800
with supplier reality because you're not operating

706
00:23:41,800 --> 00:23:43,280
on yesterday's information.

707
00:23:43,280 --> 00:23:45,880
When a shipment delay actually does require human judgment,

708
00:23:45,880 --> 00:23:48,280
it arrives on the right desk already analyzed.

709
00:23:48,280 --> 00:23:50,000
The business impact is clearly stated.

710
00:23:50,000 --> 00:23:52,440
Your procurement team isn't wasting time reading emails.

711
00:23:52,440 --> 00:23:54,560
They are making strategic decisions about exceptions.

712
00:23:54,560 --> 00:23:56,000
Your operation isn't held up waiting

713
00:23:56,000 --> 00:23:58,400
for someone to process a routine supplier update.

714
00:23:58,400 --> 00:24:00,240
The system is processing it automatically.

715
00:24:00,240 --> 00:24:03,040
Now, field service agent, the context carrier.

716
00:24:03,040 --> 00:24:05,240
Field service operates on a completely different problem

717
00:24:05,240 --> 00:24:07,640
than sales, finance, or even supply chain.

718
00:24:07,640 --> 00:24:09,320
The problem isn't data entry volume.

719
00:24:09,320 --> 00:24:10,800
It's not reconciliation cycles.

720
00:24:10,800 --> 00:24:13,760
It's fragmentation of context across a distributed workforce.

721
00:24:13,760 --> 00:24:16,400
Your field technicians are literally spread across geography.

722
00:24:16,400 --> 00:24:18,440
Driving to customer sites, working in conditions

723
00:24:18,440 --> 00:24:20,800
where they might not have reliable network access.

724
00:24:20,800 --> 00:24:22,120
They're making decisions on the fly

725
00:24:22,120 --> 00:24:23,600
with incomplete information.

726
00:24:23,600 --> 00:24:25,840
And those decisions have a direct profit impact

727
00:24:25,840 --> 00:24:28,640
that sales or finance teams rarely experience.

728
00:24:28,640 --> 00:24:30,440
But here's the problem.

729
00:24:30,440 --> 00:24:32,080
A work order gets created.

730
00:24:32,080 --> 00:24:34,200
A technician's mobile app notifies them.

731
00:24:34,200 --> 00:24:36,560
Work order at Boo-O-45612.

732
00:24:36,560 --> 00:24:39,120
Equipment failure at customer location, service level,

733
00:24:39,120 --> 00:24:40,320
four hour response.

734
00:24:40,320 --> 00:24:43,040
The technician sees a ticket number and an address.

735
00:24:43,040 --> 00:24:44,200
That's their context.

736
00:24:44,200 --> 00:24:45,640
They drive to the customer site.

737
00:24:45,640 --> 00:24:46,160
They arrive.

738
00:24:46,160 --> 00:24:47,400
They look at the equipment.

739
00:24:47,400 --> 00:24:48,360
It's an HVAC unit.

740
00:24:48,360 --> 00:24:50,920
The serial number is XYZ2847.

741
00:24:50,920 --> 00:24:52,320
But the technician has no idea what's

742
00:24:52,320 --> 00:24:53,920
been done to this unit before.

743
00:24:53,920 --> 00:24:55,680
Has it been serviced in the last six months?

744
00:24:55,680 --> 00:24:57,800
Was a similar failure reported last year?

745
00:24:57,800 --> 00:24:58,800
What parts were used?

746
00:24:58,800 --> 00:24:59,920
What's the warranty status?

747
00:24:59,920 --> 00:25:01,800
The technician starts diagnosing from scratch.

748
00:25:01,800 --> 00:25:03,760
They spend 30 minutes pulling the cover,

749
00:25:03,760 --> 00:25:06,080
checking the circuit board and testing components

750
00:25:06,080 --> 00:25:08,640
before they finally find a loose connection that was already

751
00:25:08,640 --> 00:25:11,440
tightened six months ago during the last service call.

752
00:25:11,440 --> 00:25:13,160
Because the technician just spent 30 minutes

753
00:25:13,160 --> 00:25:15,160
rediscovering a fix that's already documented

754
00:25:15,160 --> 00:25:17,840
in your system, you've already lost money on the labor.

755
00:25:17,840 --> 00:25:19,720
Or they identify a component failure

756
00:25:19,720 --> 00:25:21,480
that requires a part that's not on the truck, which

757
00:25:21,480 --> 00:25:23,000
means they have to drive back to the warehouse

758
00:25:23,000 --> 00:25:25,240
to get it and then drive back to the site.

759
00:25:25,240 --> 00:25:26,800
Total cost to resolve a problem that

760
00:25:26,800 --> 00:25:28,480
could have been fixed in one visit.

761
00:25:28,480 --> 00:25:30,520
Two trips plus three hours of technician time

762
00:25:30,520 --> 00:25:31,800
plus customer frustration.

763
00:25:31,800 --> 00:25:33,240
This is the information silo.

764
00:25:33,240 --> 00:25:34,240
And it's expensive.

765
00:25:34,240 --> 00:25:35,680
Field service margins are thin.

766
00:25:35,680 --> 00:25:37,160
A technician's time costs money.

767
00:25:37,160 --> 00:25:38,040
A vehicle costs money.

768
00:25:38,040 --> 00:25:39,360
Fuel costs money.

769
00:25:39,360 --> 00:25:41,040
And when a technician has to make two trips

770
00:25:41,040 --> 00:25:43,200
because they didn't have context the first time,

771
00:25:43,200 --> 00:25:45,480
you've just doubled the cost of that job.

772
00:25:45,480 --> 00:25:48,360
If that happens 20% of the time across your field service

773
00:25:48,360 --> 00:25:50,920
operation, you're looking at significant profit loss

774
00:25:50,920 --> 00:25:53,240
that could have been prevented by a technician

775
00:25:53,240 --> 00:25:55,640
walking onto a job site with full context.

776
00:25:55,640 --> 00:25:57,840
A field service agent solves this differently.

777
00:25:57,840 --> 00:25:59,680
When a work order gets created and assigned

778
00:25:59,680 --> 00:26:02,800
to a technician, the agent doesn't just create a notification

779
00:26:02,800 --> 00:26:03,720
with a ticket number.

780
00:26:03,720 --> 00:26:06,280
It synthesizes everything you know about this equipment

781
00:26:06,280 --> 00:26:09,240
and this situation into a brief that the technician can review

782
00:26:09,240 --> 00:26:11,800
on their mobile device before they ever leave the truck.

783
00:26:11,800 --> 00:26:13,760
The event trigger is the work order dispatch.

784
00:26:13,760 --> 00:26:16,240
The reasoning phase is where the intelligence accumulates.

785
00:26:16,240 --> 00:26:18,680
The agent pulls the equipment service history

786
00:26:18,680 --> 00:26:21,240
to see how many times it has been serviced, what the issues

787
00:26:21,240 --> 00:26:22,920
were, and how they were resolved.

788
00:26:22,920 --> 00:26:24,520
It checks for patterns to see if there

789
00:26:24,520 --> 00:26:26,880
are recurring failures or a component that

790
00:26:26,880 --> 00:26:28,560
fails every 18 months.

791
00:26:28,560 --> 00:26:31,760
The agent pulls IoT data if the equipment is connected.

792
00:26:31,760 --> 00:26:34,160
Temperature, pressure, uptime statistics,

793
00:26:34,160 --> 00:26:36,680
it looks for sensor readings that point to a specific failure

794
00:26:36,680 --> 00:26:37,240
mode.

795
00:26:37,240 --> 00:26:38,720
The agent checks parts inventory.

796
00:26:38,720 --> 00:26:41,320
If this equipment typically needs component X when

797
00:26:41,320 --> 00:26:43,560
this issue occurs is component X in stock,

798
00:26:43,560 --> 00:26:45,400
if not, can it be delivered to the job site

799
00:26:45,400 --> 00:26:47,480
or does the technician need to know to order it remotely

800
00:26:47,480 --> 00:26:49,560
before arriving, then orchestration?

801
00:26:49,560 --> 00:26:51,440
The agent prepares a mobile optimized briefing

802
00:26:51,440 --> 00:26:52,560
for the technician.

803
00:26:52,560 --> 00:26:54,160
Not a report, a briefing.

804
00:26:54,160 --> 00:26:56,600
It's formatted for someone who's literally in their vehicle

805
00:26:56,600 --> 00:26:58,680
or walking up to a customer's equipment.

806
00:26:58,680 --> 00:27:03,160
Equipment, HVAC XYZ2847, last service, six months ago.

807
00:27:03,160 --> 00:27:05,160
Lose connection repaired, current issue,

808
00:27:05,160 --> 00:27:06,840
similar symptoms reported.

809
00:27:06,840 --> 00:27:10,160
Recommendation, check, capacitor connection first.

810
00:27:10,160 --> 00:27:12,440
80% probability this is the same issue.

811
00:27:12,440 --> 00:27:14,080
If confirmed, no parts needed.

812
00:27:14,080 --> 00:27:16,400
If different, component cooling fan is in stock

813
00:27:16,400 --> 00:27:18,400
and will be staged at your next location.

814
00:27:18,400 --> 00:27:19,960
The agent also alerts the warehouse

815
00:27:19,960 --> 00:27:21,720
that a cooling fan might be needed.

816
00:27:21,720 --> 00:27:23,360
So if the technician does need it,

817
00:27:23,360 --> 00:27:24,840
it's already pulled and ready for pickup

818
00:27:24,840 --> 00:27:26,240
on the way to the next job.

819
00:27:26,240 --> 00:27:28,080
So what's actually happening is the technician

820
00:27:28,080 --> 00:27:30,520
walks up to the equipment with context already loaded.

821
00:27:30,520 --> 00:27:33,240
They know what was done before, but they know what probably failed.

822
00:27:33,240 --> 00:27:34,960
They know what parts are available.

823
00:27:34,960 --> 00:27:37,560
They complete the job on the first visit in most cases.

824
00:27:37,560 --> 00:27:40,400
First time fix rate improves, cost per job drops.

825
00:27:40,400 --> 00:27:42,760
Customer satisfaction increases because they're not waiting

826
00:27:42,760 --> 00:27:44,360
for a second technician visit.

827
00:27:44,360 --> 00:27:46,160
Your margins improve because you're not wasting

828
00:27:46,160 --> 00:27:47,840
technician time on rediscovery.

829
00:27:47,840 --> 00:27:49,400
Field service margins are thin.

830
00:27:49,400 --> 00:27:50,920
Every hour saved is profit.

831
00:27:50,920 --> 00:27:53,040
A field service agent gives technicians the context

832
00:27:53,040 --> 00:27:55,520
they need to work smarter, not just faster.

833
00:27:56,320 --> 00:27:59,120
The Dataverse Foundation, why context matters?

834
00:27:59,120 --> 00:28:01,480
All of these agents work because they're rooted in something

835
00:28:01,480 --> 00:28:03,480
generic AI can never access.

836
00:28:03,480 --> 00:28:06,080
Your business data, specifically Dataverse.

837
00:28:06,080 --> 00:28:09,200
It's the data platform that lives underneath Dynamics 365.

838
00:28:09,200 --> 00:28:10,880
Not a database in the traditional sense

839
00:28:10,880 --> 00:28:12,880
where you query tables and extract records.

840
00:28:12,880 --> 00:28:15,080
It's a structured, governed relational platform

841
00:28:15,080 --> 00:28:18,200
designed to store the entities that make your business run.

842
00:28:18,200 --> 00:28:20,680
Your accounts, your contacts, your orders, your invoices,

843
00:28:20,680 --> 00:28:22,840
your purchase orders, your cases, your work orders,

844
00:28:22,840 --> 00:28:25,320
your opportunities, all of it lives in Dataverse.

845
00:28:25,320 --> 00:28:27,720
This matters enormously for how agents work.

846
00:28:27,720 --> 00:28:30,440
When the sales qualification agent researchers are prospect,

847
00:28:30,440 --> 00:28:31,920
it's not calling out to the internet

848
00:28:31,920 --> 00:28:34,080
or hallucinating based on general knowledge.

849
00:28:34,080 --> 00:28:35,360
It's querying Dataverse.

850
00:28:35,360 --> 00:28:37,840
It's checking if you've worked with this company before

851
00:28:37,840 --> 00:28:40,400
what industry they're in, how long they've been a customer

852
00:28:40,400 --> 00:28:42,240
and what their payment history looks like.

853
00:28:42,240 --> 00:28:44,640
It's checking your account records, your contact records,

854
00:28:44,640 --> 00:28:46,200
and your opportunity history.

855
00:28:46,200 --> 00:28:47,840
When the account reconciliation agent

856
00:28:47,840 --> 00:28:50,040
analyzes a discrepancy, it's not guessing.

857
00:28:50,040 --> 00:28:51,680
It's pulling subledges from Dataverse,

858
00:28:51,680 --> 00:28:53,440
comparing them to GL entries,

859
00:28:53,440 --> 00:28:55,400
checking vendor master records for payment terms

860
00:28:55,400 --> 00:28:57,200
and checking your tolerance rules.

861
00:28:57,200 --> 00:28:59,480
When the customer intent agent understands why a customer

862
00:28:59,480 --> 00:29:01,920
is calling, it's not inferring from tone alone.

863
00:29:01,920 --> 00:29:04,040
It's querying the entire interaction history

864
00:29:04,040 --> 00:29:06,320
stored in Dataverse, previous cases,

865
00:29:06,320 --> 00:29:10,240
previous emails, contract status, payment records.

866
00:29:10,240 --> 00:29:12,320
The agent doesn't have to guess what your business logic is.

867
00:29:12,320 --> 00:29:14,120
It reads it from Dataverse.

868
00:29:14,120 --> 00:29:15,480
And here's what most people miss.

869
00:29:15,480 --> 00:29:17,240
Security alignment is built in.

870
00:29:17,240 --> 00:29:20,160
Your users access Dataverse with specific permissions.

871
00:29:20,160 --> 00:29:21,760
Sarah in the Denver Sales Office

872
00:29:21,760 --> 00:29:23,560
can see opportunities in her territory,

873
00:29:23,560 --> 00:29:26,160
but she can't see opportunities in the Seattle region

874
00:29:26,160 --> 00:29:28,520
because row-level security handles that.

875
00:29:28,520 --> 00:29:30,520
Mike in Finance can create journal entries,

876
00:29:30,520 --> 00:29:33,240
but can't delete them because of privilege-based access control.

877
00:29:33,240 --> 00:29:35,320
These aren't features bolted onto Dataverse.

878
00:29:35,320 --> 00:29:37,440
They're foundational to how Data Access works.

879
00:29:37,440 --> 00:29:39,840
Agents inherit those same security constraints.

880
00:29:39,840 --> 00:29:42,440
An agent that runs under the sales security role

881
00:29:42,440 --> 00:29:45,960
can only see and act on what a sales user can see and act on.

882
00:29:45,960 --> 00:29:47,920
It can't circumvent row-level security.

883
00:29:47,920 --> 00:29:49,240
It can't escalate privileges.

884
00:29:49,240 --> 00:29:51,480
It respects the same boundaries your employees do.

885
00:29:51,480 --> 00:29:53,600
This isn't a special agent security mode.

886
00:29:53,600 --> 00:29:54,880
It's the same security model.

887
00:29:54,880 --> 00:29:56,680
The agent operates within Dataverse

888
00:29:56,680 --> 00:29:59,000
using the same authentication and authorization layer

889
00:29:59,000 --> 00:29:59,720
as your users.

890
00:29:59,720 --> 00:30:02,520
That means you're not building a parallel governance structure.

891
00:30:02,520 --> 00:30:04,360
You're using the governance you already have.

892
00:30:04,360 --> 00:30:06,960
The integration pattern is simple because it's unified.

893
00:30:06,960 --> 00:30:09,280
You don't build custom connectors for each agent.

894
00:30:09,280 --> 00:30:11,840
You don't have API sprawl where every agent needs

895
00:30:11,840 --> 00:30:13,280
its own integration point.

896
00:30:13,280 --> 00:30:15,360
Dataverse is the universal interface.

897
00:30:15,360 --> 00:30:18,440
The sales qualification agent, the account reconciliation agent,

898
00:30:18,440 --> 00:30:20,040
and the customer intent agent,

899
00:30:20,040 --> 00:30:22,440
all query Dataverse using the same mechanisms.

900
00:30:22,440 --> 00:30:24,000
They all respect the same security.

901
00:30:24,000 --> 00:30:26,440
They all read from the same authoritative source.

902
00:30:26,440 --> 00:30:28,800
This creates something that's more subtle but more powerful.

903
00:30:28,800 --> 00:30:29,560
Coordination.

904
00:30:29,560 --> 00:30:31,840
As you add more agents to your organization,

905
00:30:31,840 --> 00:30:34,160
they're not isolated systems doing their own thing.

906
00:30:34,160 --> 00:30:36,720
They're all operating from the same Data Foundation.

907
00:30:36,720 --> 00:30:38,760
The sales qualification agent enriches a lead

908
00:30:38,760 --> 00:30:41,720
with company information and writes it back to Dataverse.

909
00:30:41,720 --> 00:30:45,000
The account reconciliation agent reads that same account record

910
00:30:45,000 --> 00:30:48,400
and uses the company size to determine which tolerance rules apply.

911
00:30:48,400 --> 00:30:50,840
The customer intent agent pulls the accounts contract status

912
00:30:50,840 --> 00:30:52,400
from the same Dataverse record.

913
00:30:52,400 --> 00:30:55,120
They're not orchestrating through APIs and web hooks.

914
00:30:55,120 --> 00:30:57,200
They're coordinating through shared context.

915
00:30:57,200 --> 00:30:58,680
When one agent updates data,

916
00:30:58,680 --> 00:31:01,040
the next agent immediately sees the updated state

917
00:31:01,040 --> 00:31:03,280
because they're all working from the same source of truth.

918
00:31:03,280 --> 00:31:04,320
That's Dataverse's role.

919
00:31:04,320 --> 00:31:05,480
It's not just a database.

920
00:31:05,480 --> 00:31:08,000
It's the operating system for agent workflows.

921
00:31:08,000 --> 00:31:10,640
It's where business logic lives, security is enforced,

922
00:31:10,640 --> 00:31:12,400
and all agents share context.

923
00:31:12,400 --> 00:31:13,560
Without Dataverse grounding,

924
00:31:13,560 --> 00:31:15,280
these agents would be chatbots.

925
00:31:15,280 --> 00:31:17,160
With it, there are autonomous participants

926
00:31:17,160 --> 00:31:19,240
in your actual business processes.

927
00:31:19,240 --> 00:31:21,320
The event reasoning orchestration framework.

928
00:31:21,320 --> 00:31:22,800
We've looked at how this pattern works

929
00:31:22,800 --> 00:31:24,160
across five different agents.

930
00:31:24,160 --> 00:31:26,680
Now, let's look at what's actually happening underneath.

931
00:31:26,680 --> 00:31:29,200
Every agent follows the same three-part architecture.

932
00:31:29,200 --> 00:31:33,080
It's the foundational pattern for every agent workflow in Dynamics 365.

933
00:31:33,080 --> 00:31:34,640
It isn't just for sales or finance.

934
00:31:34,640 --> 00:31:36,040
Once you understand this framework,

935
00:31:36,040 --> 00:31:38,400
you can apply it to any process in your company.

936
00:31:38,400 --> 00:31:39,880
The first part is the event.

937
00:31:39,880 --> 00:31:42,480
Something happens in the real world that needs a response.

938
00:31:42,480 --> 00:31:43,960
An email arrives from a prospect

939
00:31:43,960 --> 00:31:46,160
or a purchase order shows up in the system.

940
00:31:46,160 --> 00:31:47,960
A customer starts a support ticket

941
00:31:47,960 --> 00:31:50,000
or a supplier sends a status update.

942
00:31:50,000 --> 00:31:52,160
Maybe a work order is created in the field

943
00:31:52,160 --> 00:31:54,240
or the month-end closed process triggers.

944
00:31:54,240 --> 00:31:55,680
These are not scheduled tasks.

945
00:31:55,680 --> 00:31:57,960
You don't manually click a button to start them.

946
00:31:57,960 --> 00:32:00,040
The event is the exact moment something changes

947
00:32:00,040 --> 00:32:01,120
in your business.

948
00:32:01,120 --> 00:32:03,480
That change requires a decision and an action.

949
00:32:03,480 --> 00:32:05,600
This is a shift from how traditional automation works.

950
00:32:05,600 --> 00:32:07,080
Most workflows are scheduled.

951
00:32:07,080 --> 00:32:09,040
You run a nightly batch for reconciliation

952
00:32:09,040 --> 00:32:10,440
or a weekly job for lead scoring.

953
00:32:10,440 --> 00:32:11,840
It's all batch-oriented.

954
00:32:11,840 --> 00:32:13,320
An agent doesn't work that way.

955
00:32:13,320 --> 00:32:14,720
It is event-driven.

956
00:32:14,720 --> 00:32:17,120
The moment a prospect emails the agent responds.

957
00:32:17,120 --> 00:32:19,520
The moment a delivery date changes, the agent reacts.

958
00:32:19,520 --> 00:32:21,640
This is continuous operation.

959
00:32:21,640 --> 00:32:24,120
It's why agents compress your operational cycles,

960
00:32:24,120 --> 00:32:25,880
but the event is just the trigger.

961
00:32:25,880 --> 00:32:28,000
What matters is what happens next.

962
00:32:28,000 --> 00:32:30,040
The second part is the reasoning phase.

963
00:32:30,040 --> 00:32:32,040
The agent analyzes the event in context.

964
00:32:32,040 --> 00:32:33,800
This is where the intelligence layer lives.

965
00:32:33,800 --> 00:32:35,520
The agent doesn't just react blindly.

966
00:32:35,520 --> 00:32:38,240
It pulls data, checks rules, and compares patterns.

967
00:32:38,240 --> 00:32:39,880
For the sales qualification agent,

968
00:32:39,880 --> 00:32:41,480
reasoning means checking your wind data

969
00:32:41,480 --> 00:32:43,000
to see if a prospect fits.

970
00:32:43,000 --> 00:32:44,320
For the reconciliation agent,

971
00:32:44,320 --> 00:32:46,320
it means pulling sub-ledges and comparing amounts

972
00:32:46,320 --> 00:32:47,240
against your rules.

973
00:32:47,240 --> 00:32:48,800
For the customer intent agent,

974
00:32:48,800 --> 00:32:50,480
it means reading the entire history

975
00:32:50,480 --> 00:32:52,320
to see what's driving the contact.

976
00:32:52,320 --> 00:32:54,160
For the supplier communications agent,

977
00:32:54,160 --> 00:32:58,040
it means checking inventory to see if a delay is actually a crisis.

978
00:32:58,040 --> 00:33:01,000
This reasoning layer is where AI really contributes.

979
00:33:01,000 --> 00:33:02,600
It isn't just simple pattern matching.

980
00:33:02,600 --> 00:33:04,720
A rule engine can match an invoice

981
00:33:04,720 --> 00:33:06,800
if the amount is within 2% of the order,

982
00:33:06,800 --> 00:33:08,680
but what if the amount is off by 4%,

983
00:33:08,680 --> 00:33:10,560
a rule engine just stops and asks for help.

984
00:33:10,560 --> 00:33:11,960
An agent reasons about it.

985
00:33:11,960 --> 00:33:14,040
It checks the purchase order for a documented variance.

986
00:33:14,040 --> 00:33:15,920
It looks at vendor terms for a discount.

987
00:33:15,920 --> 00:33:18,800
It compares dates to see if this is just a timing difference.

988
00:33:18,800 --> 00:33:21,920
The agent uses language reasoning to understand context.

989
00:33:21,920 --> 00:33:23,560
It isn't just following hard rules.

990
00:33:23,560 --> 00:33:25,040
It reasons the way a human would,

991
00:33:25,040 --> 00:33:27,640
but it does it instantly against your entire data set.

992
00:33:27,640 --> 00:33:30,160
This distinction is important because the world is messy.

993
00:33:30,160 --> 00:33:31,800
Your business operates in ambiguity.

994
00:33:31,800 --> 00:33:34,080
Sometimes a reconciliation error is just a typo.

995
00:33:34,080 --> 00:33:35,760
Sometimes it's a legitimate variance.

996
00:33:35,760 --> 00:33:37,440
An agent can tell the difference.

997
00:33:37,440 --> 00:33:39,280
A lead might look like a tire kicker,

998
00:33:39,280 --> 00:33:42,320
but there might be a prospect you're already chasing elsewhere.

999
00:33:42,320 --> 00:33:43,960
The agent surfaces that context.

1000
00:33:43,960 --> 00:33:46,400
Reasoning allows automation to handle real complexity

1001
00:33:46,400 --> 00:33:48,080
instead of just perfect scenarios.

1002
00:33:48,080 --> 00:33:49,520
The third part is orchestration.

1003
00:33:49,520 --> 00:33:51,800
Once the agent has reasoned and made a decision,

1004
00:33:51,800 --> 00:33:53,720
it executes across your systems.

1005
00:33:53,720 --> 00:33:56,920
It creates a record, sensor notification, or updates a status.

1006
00:33:56,920 --> 00:34:00,080
It might escalate to a human or call an approval workflow.

1007
00:34:00,080 --> 00:34:02,520
For the sales agent, orchestration means enriching the lead

1008
00:34:02,520 --> 00:34:03,960
and flagging it for the team.

1009
00:34:03,960 --> 00:34:05,160
For the reconciliation agent,

1010
00:34:05,160 --> 00:34:07,640
it means creating a draft journal entry.

1011
00:34:07,640 --> 00:34:09,040
For the customer intent agent,

1012
00:34:09,040 --> 00:34:12,400
it means rooting the ticket with the context already loaded.

1013
00:34:12,400 --> 00:34:14,280
Orchestration respects your governance.

1014
00:34:14,280 --> 00:34:16,120
An agent doesn't bypass your security

1015
00:34:16,120 --> 00:34:17,480
or escalate its own privileges.

1016
00:34:17,480 --> 00:34:18,480
It can't see data.

1017
00:34:18,480 --> 00:34:20,000
It isn't authorized to see.

1018
00:34:20,000 --> 00:34:22,880
High-risk actions still require a human to sign off.

1019
00:34:22,880 --> 00:34:25,080
Low-risk routine actions happen on their own.

1020
00:34:25,080 --> 00:34:27,800
This guardrail structure makes orchestration safe.

1021
00:34:27,800 --> 00:34:29,920
The agent stays within the boundaries you define.

1022
00:34:29,920 --> 00:34:31,960
This pattern matters because it is repeatable.

1023
00:34:31,960 --> 00:34:33,560
You aren't building custom automation

1024
00:34:33,560 --> 00:34:34,880
for every single process.

1025
00:34:34,880 --> 00:34:36,480
You're applying the same event reasoning

1026
00:34:36,480 --> 00:34:39,200
orchestration framework to whatever comes next.

1027
00:34:39,200 --> 00:34:41,800
When a new process needs automation, you use this structure.

1028
00:34:41,800 --> 00:34:44,640
The governance is consistent and the tooling is the same.

1029
00:34:44,640 --> 00:34:47,360
That is how you scale agents across an entire organization.

1030
00:34:47,360 --> 00:34:50,520
The governance reality, agent 365 and the agent hub,

1031
00:34:50,520 --> 00:34:53,000
there is a problem lurking underneath everything we've discussed.

1032
00:34:53,000 --> 00:34:54,360
It isn't the agents themselves.

1033
00:34:54,360 --> 00:34:55,760
It's what happens when you deploy them

1034
00:34:55,760 --> 00:34:57,000
without a governance structure.

1035
00:34:57,000 --> 00:34:58,200
It's called shadow AI.

1036
00:34:58,200 --> 00:35:00,320
It is the compliance version of shadow IT.

1037
00:35:00,320 --> 00:35:02,040
Someone in procurement builds an agent

1038
00:35:02,040 --> 00:35:04,160
to update the ERP from supplier emails.

1039
00:35:04,160 --> 00:35:05,520
It works great for them.

1040
00:35:05,520 --> 00:35:08,160
Then finance builds an agent for expense reports.

1041
00:35:08,160 --> 00:35:09,920
Then sales builds one for lead routing.

1042
00:35:09,920 --> 00:35:11,240
Each team solves their own problem.

1043
00:35:11,240 --> 00:35:12,640
But now you have five agents running

1044
00:35:12,640 --> 00:35:13,760
and nobody knows what they're doing.

1045
00:35:13,760 --> 00:35:15,040
Nobody knows who authorised them

1046
00:35:15,040 --> 00:35:16,640
or if they're making good decisions.

1047
00:35:16,640 --> 00:35:19,560
The CFO asks which agents are running in the environment.

1048
00:35:19,560 --> 00:35:21,240
The security team can't answer.

1049
00:35:21,240 --> 00:35:22,600
The compliance officer doesn't know

1050
00:35:22,600 --> 00:35:24,360
if they're violating audit rules.

1051
00:35:24,360 --> 00:35:25,840
The controller doesn't know if an agent

1052
00:35:25,840 --> 00:35:27,680
just created a massive compliance gap.

1053
00:35:27,680 --> 00:35:29,120
This is the shadow AI problem.

1054
00:35:29,120 --> 00:35:31,760
It's real and it's why agent 365 matters.

1055
00:35:31,760 --> 00:35:34,720
Agent 365 is the identity and lifecycle management system

1056
00:35:34,720 --> 00:35:35,320
for agents.

1057
00:35:35,320 --> 00:35:36,800
It treats agents like employees.

1058
00:35:36,800 --> 00:35:39,320
They aren't autonomous software running unsupervised.

1059
00:35:39,320 --> 00:35:41,400
They are managed identities with defined roles

1060
00:35:41,400 --> 00:35:42,600
and accountability.

1061
00:35:42,600 --> 00:35:44,000
Every agent has a sponsor.

1062
00:35:44,000 --> 00:35:46,000
That's a person or a team responsible

1063
00:35:46,000 --> 00:35:47,480
for what the agent does.

1064
00:35:47,480 --> 00:35:49,920
The agent gets security roles just like a user.

1065
00:35:49,920 --> 00:35:51,880
Its actions are logged and auditable.

1066
00:35:51,880 --> 00:35:55,080
It has a defined life cycle from creation to retirement.

1067
00:35:55,080 --> 00:35:57,680
You don't just build an agent and let it run forever.

1068
00:35:57,680 --> 00:35:59,120
It has an owner and oversight.

1069
00:35:59,120 --> 00:36:01,280
This changes how safely you can scale.

1070
00:36:01,280 --> 00:36:04,240
The agent hub in Dynamics 365 is where this governance lives.

1071
00:36:04,240 --> 00:36:05,400
It's a central dashboard

1072
00:36:05,400 --> 00:36:07,760
that shows every agent running in your environment.

1073
00:36:07,760 --> 00:36:09,400
It isn't a manual spreadsheet.

1074
00:36:09,400 --> 00:36:10,400
It's a live inventory.

1075
00:36:10,400 --> 00:36:12,600
You see what each agent does and who sponsors it.

1076
00:36:12,600 --> 00:36:14,920
You see the security roles and how often it triggers.

1077
00:36:14,920 --> 00:36:17,080
You see what percentage of decisions go to humans.

1078
00:36:17,080 --> 00:36:19,200
You can see if performance is getting better or worse.

1079
00:36:19,200 --> 00:36:20,760
You aren't flying blind anymore.

1080
00:36:20,760 --> 00:36:23,360
This matters because you need to know if an agent is drifting.

1081
00:36:23,360 --> 00:36:25,080
When an agent launches, it might escalate

1082
00:36:25,080 --> 00:36:27,160
20% of decisions for review.

1083
00:36:27,160 --> 00:36:29,000
That's normal, while it learns your business.

1084
00:36:29,000 --> 00:36:31,400
Three months later, that might drop to 5%.

1085
00:36:31,400 --> 00:36:33,400
That's good news because the agent is improving,

1086
00:36:33,400 --> 00:36:36,080
but then you might notice it's processing 40% more exceptions

1087
00:36:36,080 --> 00:36:36,960
than last month.

1088
00:36:36,960 --> 00:36:38,520
That isn't a gain in confidence.

1089
00:36:38,520 --> 00:36:40,000
That is drift.

1090
00:36:40,000 --> 00:36:42,440
Something changed in your data or your supplier behavior.

1091
00:36:42,440 --> 00:36:43,920
The agent isn't adapting correctly.

1092
00:36:43,920 --> 00:36:46,800
The agent hub shows you that signal before it becomes a crisis.

1093
00:36:46,800 --> 00:36:49,360
High-risk actions still require a human signature.

1094
00:36:49,360 --> 00:36:50,960
This is baked into the orchestration.

1095
00:36:50,960 --> 00:36:53,520
A reconciliation agent can propose a journal entry,

1096
00:36:53,520 --> 00:36:55,760
but it can't post it if the amount is too high.

1097
00:36:55,760 --> 00:36:57,640
A procurement agent can update delivery dates

1098
00:36:57,640 --> 00:36:59,320
but it can't change a contract.

1099
00:36:59,320 --> 00:37:01,520
The approval workflow isn't a separate system.

1100
00:37:01,520 --> 00:37:02,960
It's part of how the agent operates.

1101
00:37:02,960 --> 00:37:04,080
The agent knows its limits.

1102
00:37:04,080 --> 00:37:06,760
It works on its own until it hits a boundary you've set.

1103
00:37:06,760 --> 00:37:10,560
The audit trail is the proof every decision is logged.

1104
00:37:10,560 --> 00:37:13,400
The system records the outcome and the reasoning behind it.

1105
00:37:13,400 --> 00:37:15,000
When an agent roots a customer,

1106
00:37:15,000 --> 00:37:17,920
the log shows the history it analyzed and the rule it applied.

1107
00:37:17,920 --> 00:37:19,440
When it proposes a journal entry,

1108
00:37:19,440 --> 00:37:22,360
the log shows the data sources and the business rules.

1109
00:37:22,360 --> 00:37:25,240
If an auditor asks why something happened, you don't have to guess.

1110
00:37:25,240 --> 00:37:26,480
The decision chain is right there.

1111
00:37:26,480 --> 00:37:29,000
This governance is what makes agents enterprise grade.

1112
00:37:29,000 --> 00:37:32,360
It moves them from an experiment to a real part of the business.

1113
00:37:32,360 --> 00:37:35,440
Model context protocol, the language agents speak.

1114
00:37:35,440 --> 00:37:38,160
There is a technical layer underneath everything we have discussed

1115
00:37:38,160 --> 00:37:39,960
that makes the whole system work together.

1116
00:37:39,960 --> 00:37:43,120
It is called model context protocol or MCP.

1117
00:37:43,120 --> 00:37:46,200
It is the language agents use to talk to your enterprise systems.

1118
00:37:46,200 --> 00:37:47,760
But here is the problem it solves.

1119
00:37:47,760 --> 00:37:51,480
If you have five agents that need to access your data and trigger actions,

1120
00:37:51,480 --> 00:37:53,160
do you build five separate integrations?

1121
00:37:53,160 --> 00:37:56,240
Do you write custom code for every single agent to talk to dataverse?

1122
00:37:56,240 --> 00:37:59,440
Do you create five different API layers that scales like a nightmare?

1123
00:37:59,440 --> 00:38:02,240
By the time you have 20 agents across your organization,

1124
00:38:02,240 --> 00:38:04,200
you have 20 custom integration points.

1125
00:38:04,200 --> 00:38:05,280
Every single one is brittle.

1126
00:38:05,280 --> 00:38:07,040
Every single one is a security gap.

1127
00:38:07,040 --> 00:38:09,520
And every single one requires manual maintenance,

1128
00:38:09,520 --> 00:38:11,600
the moment your business logic changes.

1129
00:38:11,600 --> 00:38:13,400
MCP inverts that problem.

1130
00:38:13,400 --> 00:38:15,720
Instead of agents calling custom APIs,

1131
00:38:15,720 --> 00:38:17,280
MCP is a standard protocol.

1132
00:38:17,280 --> 00:38:19,240
Agents use it to describe what they need.

1133
00:38:19,240 --> 00:38:21,680
And your systems respond in a consistent way.

1134
00:38:21,680 --> 00:38:25,440
Without MCP, you are building a new phone line every time you want to talk to someone.

1135
00:38:25,440 --> 00:38:29,840
With MCP, you are using a standardized communication protocol that anyone can use.

1136
00:38:29,840 --> 00:38:33,720
An agent says, "I need a list of active purchase orders from the last 30 days."

1137
00:38:33,720 --> 00:38:37,320
The MCP server hears that request and translates it into a dataverse query.

1138
00:38:37,320 --> 00:38:39,800
The agent does not have to know how to query dataverse.

1139
00:38:39,800 --> 00:38:42,440
And it does not need to understand your data schema.

1140
00:38:42,440 --> 00:38:44,640
It describes what it needs in plain language.

1141
00:38:44,640 --> 00:38:46,760
And the MCP server handles the translation.

1142
00:38:46,760 --> 00:38:50,520
This matters for scaling because it decouples agents from your infrastructure.

1143
00:38:50,520 --> 00:38:53,920
The sales qualification agent does not care whether you run dataverse.

1144
00:38:53,920 --> 00:38:57,440
SAP, Oracle, or a custom system that describes what it needs,

1145
00:38:57,440 --> 00:38:59,600
like company information or contact records.

1146
00:38:59,600 --> 00:39:03,440
And the MCP server translates that into whatever backend you are using.

1147
00:39:03,440 --> 00:39:06,400
You are not writing new code for every agent you deploy.

1148
00:39:06,400 --> 00:39:10,320
You are simply configuring which data and which operations the MCP server exposes.

1149
00:39:10,320 --> 00:39:11,560
That is a massive difference.

1150
00:39:11,560 --> 00:39:12,800
Configuration scales.

1151
00:39:12,800 --> 00:39:14,360
Custom code does not.

1152
00:39:14,360 --> 00:39:15,880
So what does this look like in practice?

1153
00:39:15,880 --> 00:39:19,640
Imagine you are building a new agent for a process that does not exist yet.

1154
00:39:19,640 --> 00:39:21,400
In the old model, you would say.

1155
00:39:21,400 --> 00:39:24,600
I need to build a custom API that this agent can call.

1156
00:39:24,600 --> 00:39:25,720
That takes development time.

1157
00:39:25,720 --> 00:39:28,640
Someone has to write code, test it, and deploy it.

1158
00:39:28,640 --> 00:39:30,880
With MCP, you just say.

1159
00:39:30,880 --> 00:39:32,680
Here is what my agent needs to do.

1160
00:39:32,680 --> 00:39:37,280
It needs to read inventory levels, check production schedules, and pull supplier contracts.

1161
00:39:37,280 --> 00:39:39,640
The MCP server already has access to all of that.

1162
00:39:39,640 --> 00:39:44,360
You configure which data the agent can see and which operations it can perform.

1163
00:39:44,360 --> 00:39:45,200
And then you are done.

1164
00:39:45,200 --> 00:39:49,480
No new code, no new API, just configuration.

1165
00:39:49,480 --> 00:39:52,960
The security implication is straightforward because it is inherited.

1166
00:39:52,960 --> 00:39:56,640
An MCP server enforces the same security roles as dataverse.

1167
00:39:56,640 --> 00:40:00,240
If a user is restricted from seeing certain data due to row-level security,

1168
00:40:00,240 --> 00:40:03,280
an agent using that MCP server is also restricted.

1169
00:40:03,280 --> 00:40:05,760
You are not building parallel security structures.

1170
00:40:05,760 --> 00:40:07,920
You are leveraging the security you already have.

1171
00:40:07,920 --> 00:40:11,080
An agent can only access what its assigned security role allows.

1172
00:40:11,080 --> 00:40:13,280
The MCP server is the enforcement point.

1173
00:40:13,280 --> 00:40:16,040
But the rules are the same ones governing your users.

1174
00:40:16,040 --> 00:40:19,200
And there is an ecosystem angle here that matters for the future.

1175
00:40:19,200 --> 00:40:20,880
MCP is becoming an industry standard.

1176
00:40:20,880 --> 00:40:23,560
It is not proprietary to Dynamics 365.

1177
00:40:23,560 --> 00:40:28,360
Anthropic, the company behind Claude, developed it as an open standard, Microsoft is adopting it.

1178
00:40:28,360 --> 00:40:32,320
If you build agents in co-pilot studio that use MCP servers, those agents can talk to your

1179
00:40:32,320 --> 00:40:37,440
dataverse, but they can also talk to SAP systems, Oracle backends or custom applications.

1180
00:40:37,440 --> 00:40:41,320
This matters because it means agents built in Microsoft's ecosystem are not trapped in

1181
00:40:41,320 --> 00:40:42,720
Microsoft infrastructure.

1182
00:40:42,720 --> 00:40:45,480
They can orchestrate across your entire technology stack.

1183
00:40:45,480 --> 00:40:49,400
For your organization right now, MCP means you are not going to have an API explosion as

1184
00:40:49,400 --> 00:40:51,000
you deploy more agents.

1185
00:40:51,000 --> 00:40:54,280
You are going to have a configuration system that gets more powerful as more agents use

1186
00:40:54,280 --> 00:40:55,280
it.

1187
00:40:55,280 --> 00:40:58,040
Each new agent you add does not increase your technical debt.

1188
00:40:58,040 --> 00:41:00,400
It increases your operational capability.

1189
00:41:00,400 --> 00:41:01,600
The skills shift.

1190
00:41:01,600 --> 00:41:03,600
What changes when agents take over?

1191
00:41:03,600 --> 00:41:06,200
Here is what nobody talks about when they discuss automation.

1192
00:41:06,200 --> 00:41:09,680
The human beings in your organization are going to feel threatened.

1193
00:41:09,680 --> 00:41:13,520
Not because they are irrational, but because they are accurate, their job is changing.

1194
00:41:13,520 --> 00:41:16,560
The question is whether you manage that change or let it happen to them.

1195
00:41:16,560 --> 00:41:20,720
Right now, most people in your organization spend their time operating the system.

1196
00:41:20,720 --> 00:41:24,160
A sales development rep spends their day entering leads into sales force.

1197
00:41:24,160 --> 00:41:25,800
They are not thinking about sales strategy.

1198
00:41:25,800 --> 00:41:26,800
They are entering data.

1199
00:41:26,800 --> 00:41:31,000
A finance analyst spends their day matching invoices and creating journal entries.

1200
00:41:31,000 --> 00:41:33,320
They are not analyzing trends or identifying risk.

1201
00:41:33,320 --> 00:41:34,320
They are doing bookkeeping.

1202
00:41:34,320 --> 00:41:38,560
A procurement coordinator spends their week responding to supplier emails.

1203
00:41:38,560 --> 00:41:41,120
Updating spreadsheets and coordinating delivery dates.

1204
00:41:41,120 --> 00:41:44,360
They are not sourcing strategically or building vendor relationships.

1205
00:41:44,360 --> 00:41:45,920
They are managing an email inbox.

1206
00:41:45,920 --> 00:41:49,360
These are smart people doing work that does not require them to be smart.

1207
00:41:49,360 --> 00:41:52,080
When agents take over that work, the role fundamentally changes.

1208
00:41:52,080 --> 00:41:53,600
The old role was execution.

1209
00:41:53,600 --> 00:41:56,120
Do this task, do it correctly and do it fast.

1210
00:41:56,120 --> 00:41:57,720
Follow the process.

1211
00:41:57,720 --> 00:41:59,280
The new role is decision making.

1212
00:41:59,280 --> 00:42:02,360
The agent handles the execution and the human handles the exception.

1213
00:42:02,360 --> 00:42:03,680
A lead comes in.

1214
00:42:03,680 --> 00:42:07,120
The agent researches it and the human decides whether to pursue it.

1215
00:42:07,120 --> 00:42:08,920
An invoice discrepancy is flagged.

1216
00:42:08,920 --> 00:42:10,800
The agent proposes the correction.

1217
00:42:10,800 --> 00:42:13,560
And the human approves or declines based on judgment.

1218
00:42:13,560 --> 00:42:15,520
A supplier sends an urgent notification.

1219
00:42:15,520 --> 00:42:19,520
The agent escalates it and the human decides the business impact and what to do about it.

1220
00:42:19,520 --> 00:42:21,360
This is a fundamental skill shift.

1221
00:42:21,360 --> 00:42:24,160
You are not asking people to become better at their current job.

1222
00:42:24,160 --> 00:42:27,640
You are asking them to do a different job and if you do not prepare them for that shift,

1223
00:42:27,640 --> 00:42:28,800
they will resist.

1224
00:42:28,800 --> 00:42:32,600
Not because they are lazy or afraid of technology, but because you have asked them to perform

1225
00:42:32,600 --> 00:42:35,480
a completely different role without warning or training.

1226
00:42:35,480 --> 00:42:37,360
What this means for hiring is immediate.

1227
00:42:37,360 --> 00:42:40,440
You stop looking for people who are really good at operating systems.

1228
00:42:40,440 --> 00:42:44,760
You stop hiring for strong Excel skills or detail oriented data entry.

1229
00:42:44,760 --> 00:42:46,240
You start hiring for judgment.

1230
00:42:46,240 --> 00:42:49,320
You hire for the ability to reason through ambiguous situations.

1231
00:42:49,320 --> 00:42:53,720
For strategic thinking and for relationship building, these are different hiring profiles entirely.

1232
00:42:53,720 --> 00:42:57,600
A person who was an excellent reconciliation specialist because they could match numbers

1233
00:42:57,600 --> 00:43:02,960
precisely might not be the right fit for an analyst role that requires identifying patterns

1234
00:43:02,960 --> 00:43:04,760
and recommending changes.

1235
00:43:04,760 --> 00:43:08,760
Not because they are less capable but because their strengths were in a different domain.

1236
00:43:08,760 --> 00:43:11,320
The transition risk is real because it is not optional.

1237
00:43:11,320 --> 00:43:15,080
If you deploy agents without retraining your teams, you do not get smooth adoption.

1238
00:43:15,080 --> 00:43:16,440
You get resistance.

1239
00:43:16,440 --> 00:43:18,400
People feel replaced instead of augmented.

1240
00:43:18,400 --> 00:43:21,000
They lack context for what they are supposed to do now.

1241
00:43:21,000 --> 00:43:25,600
The agent is executing but nobody trains the human to manage exceptions, to make judgment

1242
00:43:25,600 --> 00:43:29,600
calls or to think strategically so they either try to do the old work that the agent is already

1243
00:43:29,600 --> 00:43:31,440
doing or they feel lost.

1244
00:43:31,440 --> 00:43:33,280
Both outcomes are bad.

1245
00:43:33,280 --> 00:43:35,080
The upside is what makes it worth doing.

1246
00:43:35,080 --> 00:43:36,840
People stop spending their intelligence on patients.

1247
00:43:36,840 --> 00:43:39,560
A reconciliation analyst can actually analyze instead of matching.

1248
00:43:39,560 --> 00:43:42,680
A sales rep can actually build relationships instead of entering data.

1249
00:43:42,680 --> 00:43:46,000
A procurement coordinator can actually source instead of answering emails.

1250
00:43:46,000 --> 00:43:47,240
This is not just time savings.

1251
00:43:47,240 --> 00:43:50,840
It is the difference between work that exhausts you and work that develops you.

1252
00:43:50,840 --> 00:43:53,480
It is the difference between a job and a career path.

1253
00:43:53,480 --> 00:43:56,680
The organizational shift that emerges is subtle but transformative.

1254
00:43:56,680 --> 00:43:57,680
Support functions.

1255
00:43:57,680 --> 00:44:00,960
Stop being cost centers and start being strategic capabilities.

1256
00:44:00,960 --> 00:44:04,240
Finance stops being the people who close the books and becomes the people who understand

1257
00:44:04,240 --> 00:44:05,640
your business financially.

1258
00:44:05,640 --> 00:44:09,720
Sales stops being the people who enter opportunities and becomes the people who understand your

1259
00:44:09,720 --> 00:44:11,640
market and your customers deeply.

1260
00:44:11,640 --> 00:44:15,760
Supply chain stops being coordination and becomes resilience and optimization.

1261
00:44:15,760 --> 00:44:17,080
These functions do not disappear.

1262
00:44:17,080 --> 00:44:18,600
They evolve upward.

1263
00:44:18,600 --> 00:44:20,080
But here is what people miss.

1264
00:44:20,080 --> 00:44:23,240
This is a change management challenge first and a technology deployment second.

1265
00:44:23,240 --> 00:44:25,840
The technology works.

1266
00:44:25,840 --> 00:44:28,720
The hard part is helping your organization through the transition.

1267
00:44:28,720 --> 00:44:31,400
Your people need to understand why their role is changing.

1268
00:44:31,400 --> 00:44:35,120
They need training for what the new role actually is and they need time to adapt if you skip

1269
00:44:35,120 --> 00:44:36,120
that work.

1270
00:44:36,120 --> 00:44:40,640
You will have adoption resistance that no amount of technology can overcome.

1271
00:44:40,640 --> 00:44:42,160
The ROI math.

1272
00:44:42,160 --> 00:44:44,080
Why this justifies the investment?

1273
00:44:44,080 --> 00:44:45,960
Let's get practical for a moment.

1274
00:44:45,960 --> 00:44:48,480
None of this matters if you can't justify the cost.

1275
00:44:48,480 --> 00:44:51,360
Implementing agents across your organization requires real investment.

1276
00:44:51,360 --> 00:44:52,680
You're buying licenses.

1277
00:44:52,680 --> 00:44:54,920
You're building agents in co-pilot studio.

1278
00:44:54,920 --> 00:44:57,520
You're dedicating time to configuration and governance.

1279
00:44:57,520 --> 00:45:00,440
You're running change management to help your teams through the transition.

1280
00:45:00,440 --> 00:45:01,840
That's real money.

1281
00:45:01,840 --> 00:45:04,080
Your CFO is asking, what's the payback?

1282
00:45:04,080 --> 00:45:05,920
When do we see this investment return?

1283
00:45:05,920 --> 00:45:09,680
The math is actually straight forward because agents affect four direct levers on your

1284
00:45:09,680 --> 00:45:10,680
P&L.

1285
00:45:10,680 --> 00:45:11,680
The first is labor cost.

1286
00:45:11,680 --> 00:45:15,280
When agent handles 40% of reconciliation work, you have options.

1287
00:45:15,280 --> 00:45:16,640
You can reduce headcount.

1288
00:45:16,640 --> 00:45:20,240
You can redeploy that capacity to higher value analytical work either way.

1289
00:45:20,240 --> 00:45:21,720
You aren't paying someone to do work.

1290
00:45:21,720 --> 00:45:23,520
The agent can do automatically.

1291
00:45:23,520 --> 00:45:28,440
If you have a five person reconciliation team and an agent handles 40% of the workload,

1292
00:45:28,440 --> 00:45:32,240
that's 1.6 full-time equivalents of capacity you've freed up.

1293
00:45:32,240 --> 00:45:37,040
At an average fully loaded cost of $120,000 per year, salary plus benefits plus overhead,

1294
00:45:37,040 --> 00:45:39,880
that's $192,000 in annual savings.

1295
00:45:39,880 --> 00:45:43,440
That's real money that flows to your bottom line or gets redeployed to work that generates

1296
00:45:43,440 --> 00:45:44,440
value.

1297
00:45:44,440 --> 00:45:45,720
The second lever is speed.

1298
00:45:45,720 --> 00:45:48,280
Fast or operational cycles compress working capital.

1299
00:45:48,280 --> 00:45:52,120
Your month and close takes five days right now and agent reduces that to one day.

1300
00:45:52,120 --> 00:45:55,400
Those four days represent working capital that's tied up because you don't have accurate

1301
00:45:55,400 --> 00:45:56,400
financials.

1302
00:45:56,400 --> 00:46:00,920
Fewer days of working capital outstanding means more cash available for operations or investment.

1303
00:46:00,920 --> 00:46:05,360
Your order to cash cycle takes 45 days because of slow customer rooting and manual invoice

1304
00:46:05,360 --> 00:46:06,600
processing.

1305
00:46:06,600 --> 00:46:08,280
You can compress that to 35 days.

1306
00:46:08,280 --> 00:46:10,320
That's 10 days of receivables freed up.

1307
00:46:10,320 --> 00:46:14,660
For a mid-market organization doing $100 million in annual revenue, 10 days of receivables at

1308
00:46:14,660 --> 00:46:18,760
roughly one month of daily revenue is a massive working capital improvement.

1309
00:46:18,760 --> 00:46:22,680
Your procurement cycle compresses because supplier communications are instant instead of

1310
00:46:22,680 --> 00:46:23,760
data laid.

1311
00:46:23,760 --> 00:46:27,840
That means you get products to market faster or deliver to customers quicker.

1312
00:46:27,840 --> 00:46:31,200
Speed translates to competitive advantage and working capital efficiency.

1313
00:46:31,200 --> 00:46:32,800
The third lever is error reduction.

1314
00:46:32,800 --> 00:46:34,440
Agents don't make typos.

1315
00:46:34,440 --> 00:46:37,920
They don't misroot a customer to the wrong department because they misread an email.

1316
00:46:37,920 --> 00:46:41,040
They don't misapply a communication that creates a production delay.

1317
00:46:41,040 --> 00:46:44,120
They don't post journal entries with reverse account codes.

1318
00:46:44,120 --> 00:46:45,280
These errors have costs.

1319
00:46:45,280 --> 00:46:47,800
A misruded customer might escalate or churn.

1320
00:46:47,800 --> 00:46:52,360
A mis-supplyer email might delay production and create customer dissatisfaction.

1321
00:46:52,360 --> 00:46:56,920
A reverse journal entry creates confusion in your financials and takes time to correct.

1322
00:46:56,920 --> 00:46:58,960
None of these costs are huge individually.

1323
00:46:58,960 --> 00:47:04,000
But across thousands of transactions monthly, error reduction compounds into measurable savings.

1324
00:47:04,000 --> 00:47:08,120
More importantly, it compounds into quality improvements that customers experience.

1325
00:47:08,120 --> 00:47:10,240
The fourth lever is compliance.

1326
00:47:10,240 --> 00:47:12,240
Agents create ordered-ready logs.

1327
00:47:12,240 --> 00:47:16,120
They apply policies consistently instead of inconsistently depending on which person

1328
00:47:16,120 --> 00:47:17,600
is handling the transaction.

1329
00:47:17,600 --> 00:47:21,360
They reduce fraud risk because there is a systematic check instead of human judgment that

1330
00:47:21,360 --> 00:47:23,000
can be influenced or overlooked.

1331
00:47:23,000 --> 00:47:25,120
These aren't dramatic year-to-year impacts.

1332
00:47:25,120 --> 00:47:27,760
But they reduce your compliance risk and audit costs.

1333
00:47:27,760 --> 00:47:32,440
In regulated industries especially, this translates to insurance savings, audit fee reduction,

1334
00:47:32,440 --> 00:47:34,920
or reduced risk of non-compliance penalties.

1335
00:47:34,920 --> 00:47:36,480
Here's where the numbers actually come from.

1336
00:47:36,480 --> 00:47:40,160
US Ventures deployed an account reconciliation agent and reduced their reconciliation cycle

1337
00:47:40,160 --> 00:47:41,560
by 80%.

1338
00:47:41,560 --> 00:47:45,160
That freed up capacity that would have cost them significant money to maintain.

1339
00:47:45,160 --> 00:47:48,840
Lifetime products cut their procurement workload by 20% through supplier communications

1340
00:47:48,840 --> 00:47:52,880
agents, which translates to headcount reduction or redeployment.

1341
00:47:52,880 --> 00:47:58,040
Microsoft's own composite business case modeling shows an average ROI of 171% over three

1342
00:47:58,040 --> 00:48:00,960
years for agentic AI deployments.

1343
00:48:00,960 --> 00:48:04,440
With organizations see payback within 12 months because the labor savings alone typically

1344
00:48:04,440 --> 00:48:07,160
covers the implementation cost in the first year.

1345
00:48:07,160 --> 00:48:11,920
But there's a hidden benefit that compounds beyond those four levers, speed compounds.

1346
00:48:11,920 --> 00:48:15,600
Faster cycles mean you can serve more customers without proportional headcount growth.

1347
00:48:15,600 --> 00:48:20,000
A sales team that can qualify leads twice as fast can pursue twice as many opportunities

1348
00:48:20,000 --> 00:48:21,400
without doubling the team.

1349
00:48:21,400 --> 00:48:25,480
A finance team that closes the books in one day instead of five has time for analysis

1350
00:48:25,480 --> 00:48:28,040
that actually moves the needle on business performance.

1351
00:48:28,040 --> 00:48:31,600
A procurement team that processes supplier communications instantly can manage more

1352
00:48:31,600 --> 00:48:34,640
vendor relationships strategically instead of operationally.

1353
00:48:34,640 --> 00:48:38,040
You're not just saving money on the current operation, you're creating capacity for growth

1354
00:48:38,040 --> 00:48:41,280
without the cost structure that growth typically requires.

1355
00:48:41,280 --> 00:48:43,240
That's where the real ROI lives.

1356
00:48:43,240 --> 00:48:46,960
The integration challenge, how agents talk to legacy systems.

1357
00:48:46,960 --> 00:48:49,400
Most of what we've discussed assumes the best case scenario.

1358
00:48:49,400 --> 00:48:53,920
Your entire operation runs on Dynamics 365, data lives in dataverse, agents query dataverse

1359
00:48:53,920 --> 00:48:56,000
and execute back into dataverse.

1360
00:48:56,000 --> 00:48:58,760
And integrated, simple, that's not your organization.

1361
00:48:58,760 --> 00:49:00,040
Your reality is more complicated.

1362
00:49:00,040 --> 00:49:03,040
You have Dynamics 365 for sales and customer service.

1363
00:49:03,040 --> 00:49:07,200
Your ERP is SAP or Oracle, something that's been running for 15 years and isn't going

1364
00:49:07,200 --> 00:49:08,520
anywhere.

1365
00:49:08,520 --> 00:49:12,800
Your warehouse management system is a specialized tool from a vendor nobody's heard of.

1366
00:49:12,800 --> 00:49:14,840
Your accounting system might be net sweet.

1367
00:49:14,840 --> 00:49:16,800
Your talent management is separate from everything else.

1368
00:49:16,800 --> 00:49:20,280
You've got islands of software and they don't talk to each other naturally.

1369
00:49:20,280 --> 00:49:24,720
People manually export data from one system, imported into another and the gaps get filled

1370
00:49:24,720 --> 00:49:26,240
by email and spreadsheets.

1371
00:49:26,240 --> 00:49:30,000
This is the heterogeneous environment where most organizations actually live.

1372
00:49:30,000 --> 00:49:32,040
The agent problem in this world is direct.

1373
00:49:32,040 --> 00:49:36,200
An agent in D365 needs to trigger an action in your legacy SAP system.

1374
00:49:36,200 --> 00:49:37,200
How does that happen?

1375
00:49:37,200 --> 00:49:40,760
The solution isn't to rip out your legacy systems and rebuild everything in Azure.

1376
00:49:40,760 --> 00:49:41,880
That's not realistic.

1377
00:49:41,880 --> 00:49:46,120
The solution is orchestration through integration platforms, power automate or logic apps become

1378
00:49:46,120 --> 00:49:47,120
the bridge layer.

1379
00:49:47,120 --> 00:49:48,200
Here's the mechanics.

1380
00:49:48,200 --> 00:49:52,040
The agent in D365 makes a decision and needs to execute an action.

1381
00:49:52,040 --> 00:49:55,920
Instead of directly calling the legacy system, the agent invokes a flow.

1382
00:49:55,920 --> 00:50:00,200
That flow understands how to translate the agent's decision into a legacy system operation.

1383
00:50:00,200 --> 00:50:02,720
The agent says update this PO delivery date.

1384
00:50:02,720 --> 00:50:06,840
The flow takes that instruction and converts it into whatever API call your SAP system

1385
00:50:06,840 --> 00:50:07,840
expects.

1386
00:50:07,840 --> 00:50:09,400
The flow handles the translation.

1387
00:50:09,400 --> 00:50:12,640
The agent doesn't need to know how your legacy ERP works.

1388
00:50:12,640 --> 00:50:16,000
This matters because it preserves your existing infrastructure investment while adding

1389
00:50:16,000 --> 00:50:17,720
agente capability on top of it.

1390
00:50:17,720 --> 00:50:23,680
A practical example, a supplier communications agent in D365 reads an incoming supplier email.

1391
00:50:23,680 --> 00:50:26,800
The email says your shipment is delayed three days.

1392
00:50:26,800 --> 00:50:31,300
The agent reasons about impact decides to update the PO delivery date and escalates to

1393
00:50:31,300 --> 00:50:33,480
procurement if the delay is critical.

1394
00:50:33,480 --> 00:50:37,160
To execute this decision, the agent needs to update your warehouse management system.

1395
00:50:37,160 --> 00:50:41,520
But your WMS is a specialized system that doesn't talk to D365 natively.

1396
00:50:41,520 --> 00:50:42,520
Here's what happens.

1397
00:50:42,520 --> 00:50:44,560
The agent calls a power automate flow.

1398
00:50:44,560 --> 00:50:47,240
The flow knows how to communicate with your WMS.

1399
00:50:47,240 --> 00:50:51,640
It extracts the relevant data from the agent's decision, formats it according to WMS API

1400
00:50:51,640 --> 00:50:53,400
requirements and makes the call.

1401
00:50:53,400 --> 00:50:54,920
The WMS gets updated.

1402
00:50:54,920 --> 00:50:58,560
The system remains orchestrated even though the agent and the target systems speak different

1403
00:50:58,560 --> 00:50:59,560
languages.

1404
00:50:59,560 --> 00:51:01,800
The governance layer is where the enterprise safeguard lives.

1405
00:51:01,800 --> 00:51:04,080
The flow doesn't just translate between systems.

1406
00:51:04,080 --> 00:51:06,040
It also enforces your business rules.

1407
00:51:06,040 --> 00:51:08,480
High value purchase order changes require approval.

1408
00:51:08,480 --> 00:51:09,840
The flow checks the PO amount.

1409
00:51:09,840 --> 00:51:12,800
If it exceeds threshold, the flow doesn't execute automatically.

1410
00:51:12,800 --> 00:51:16,120
It creates an approval request in D365 and waits for human sign-off.

1411
00:51:16,120 --> 00:51:18,760
If it's under threshold, the flow executes directly.

1412
00:51:18,760 --> 00:51:23,360
This means your approval workflows and audit requirements stay intact even as agents orchestrate

1413
00:51:23,360 --> 00:51:24,840
across heterogeneous systems.

1414
00:51:24,840 --> 00:51:26,640
The agent doesn't bypass governance.

1415
00:51:26,640 --> 00:51:28,840
The flow becomes the governance enforcement point.

1416
00:51:28,840 --> 00:51:32,120
The implication is that you don't need to make a technology bet on replacing all your

1417
00:51:32,120 --> 00:51:33,040
legacy systems.

1418
00:51:33,040 --> 00:51:36,120
You can add agente capability to D365.

1419
00:51:36,120 --> 00:51:39,720
Have those agents orchestrate across your entire technology landscape and let your legacy

1420
00:51:39,720 --> 00:51:41,440
systems run indefinitely.

1421
00:51:41,440 --> 00:51:45,520
At the same time, as those systems age out, you might consolidate more functionality into

1422
00:51:45,520 --> 00:51:46,840
D365.

1423
00:51:46,840 --> 00:51:49,840
But you're not forced into that decision because you deployed agents.

1424
00:51:49,840 --> 00:51:53,480
You've decoupled the agent capability from the legacy system rationalization decision

1425
00:51:53,480 --> 00:51:55,000
that two separate problems.

1426
00:51:55,000 --> 00:51:59,800
You can solve the agent problem without solving the legacy system problem simultaneously.

1427
00:51:59,800 --> 00:52:04,640
This is why organizations with complex heterogeneous IT environments can actually move faster on

1428
00:52:04,640 --> 00:52:07,080
agents than organizations with simplest stacks.

1429
00:52:07,080 --> 00:52:09,000
You've already built the integration discipline.

1430
00:52:09,000 --> 00:52:11,640
You already have API conversations happening across systems.

1431
00:52:11,640 --> 00:52:14,480
You're just adding agents to that orchestration layer.

1432
00:52:14,480 --> 00:52:15,480
It's not a stretch.

1433
00:52:15,480 --> 00:52:16,480
It's an evolution.

1434
00:52:16,480 --> 00:52:17,800
The data quality prerequisite.

1435
00:52:17,800 --> 00:52:19,520
You can't automate garbage.

1436
00:52:19,520 --> 00:52:22,960
Here is the conversation happening in too many offices right after the agents are built

1437
00:52:22,960 --> 00:52:24,320
and ready to go.

1438
00:52:24,320 --> 00:52:27,680
Someone in IT says the reconciliation agent is finished and they are ready to go live in

1439
00:52:27,680 --> 00:52:28,680
production.

1440
00:52:28,680 --> 00:52:30,120
Then someone from finance speaks up.

1441
00:52:30,120 --> 00:52:33,840
They point out that the supplier master is a mess because 30 different vendors have multiple

1442
00:52:33,840 --> 00:52:35,440
names in the system.

1443
00:52:35,440 --> 00:52:37,560
Sometimes the company is listed as ACME Corp.

1444
00:52:37,560 --> 00:52:41,120
Other times it is just ACME or maybe ACME Corporation.

1445
00:52:41,120 --> 00:52:44,760
The agent is going to see an invoice from one and think it is a totally different vendor

1446
00:52:44,760 --> 00:52:45,760
than the other.

1447
00:52:45,760 --> 00:52:49,040
It will end up flagging errors on invoices that should have been a perfect match.

1448
00:52:49,040 --> 00:52:50,880
That is the moment where things get real.

1449
00:52:50,880 --> 00:52:53,240
You can build the most advanced agent in the world.

1450
00:52:53,240 --> 00:52:57,040
But if the data underneath it is broken, the agent's decisions will be broken too.

1451
00:52:57,040 --> 00:52:59,040
You aren't actually automating excellence.

1452
00:52:59,040 --> 00:53:02,120
You are just automating mistakes at a much higher speed in scale.

1453
00:53:02,120 --> 00:53:07,080
This is the data quality problem and you have to solve it before a single agent is deployed.

1454
00:53:07,080 --> 00:53:11,600
Most companies live with dirty data because it is tolerable when humans are the ones doing

1455
00:53:11,600 --> 00:53:12,600
the work.

1456
00:53:12,600 --> 00:53:16,240
A person reconciling an invoice can see that ACME Corp and ACME are the same place because

1457
00:53:16,240 --> 00:53:18,120
they have context and common sense.

1458
00:53:18,120 --> 00:53:22,640
If a lead record is missing a company name, a human does a quick search to figure it out.

1459
00:53:22,640 --> 00:53:27,440
When customer info is incomplete, people dig into related files and infer what is missing.

1460
00:53:27,440 --> 00:53:30,680
Humans are flexible enough to work around these gaps, but agents are not.

1461
00:53:30,680 --> 00:53:32,000
An agent does not have judgment.

1462
00:53:32,000 --> 00:53:33,320
It only has data and logic.

1463
00:53:33,320 --> 00:53:36,800
If a customer record is missing a phone number, the agent won't try to guess it from other

1464
00:53:36,800 --> 00:53:37,800
files.

1465
00:53:37,800 --> 00:53:39,560
It just marks the record as incomplete.

1466
00:53:39,560 --> 00:53:43,000
If a lead is missing an industry tag, the agent cannot score it against your ideal patterns

1467
00:53:43,000 --> 00:53:45,400
because the information simply isn't there.

1468
00:53:45,400 --> 00:53:49,400
When a purchase order lacks a cost center, the agent cannot root it for approval because

1469
00:53:49,400 --> 00:53:52,040
it has no idea where the money is supposed to come from.

1470
00:53:52,040 --> 00:53:56,480
The messy data your team tolerates today will become a total blocker for your agents tomorrow.

1471
00:53:56,480 --> 00:54:00,800
You cannot deploy these tools at scale on a foundation of duplicates and inconsistencies.

1472
00:54:00,800 --> 00:54:05,320
The agent will either make a bad call or escalate every single task back to a human because

1473
00:54:05,320 --> 00:54:07,000
it can't find the context it needs.

1474
00:54:07,000 --> 00:54:09,760
Either way, you lose the automation benefit you are paying for.

1475
00:54:09,760 --> 00:54:12,240
So before you launch, you have to fix the foundation.

1476
00:54:12,240 --> 00:54:13,600
This starts with data cleansing.

1477
00:54:13,600 --> 00:54:16,640
You need to find the duplicates and merge them into one clean record.

1478
00:54:16,640 --> 00:54:21,120
You have to standardize your naming conventions if there are 30 ways to spell a vendor name.

1479
00:54:21,120 --> 00:54:22,920
You pick one and apply it everywhere.

1480
00:54:22,920 --> 00:54:26,960
If contact records are missing numbers, you either fill them in or mark them in valid,

1481
00:54:26,960 --> 00:54:28,440
so the agent knows to skip them.

1482
00:54:28,440 --> 00:54:29,920
This isn't high-level strategy.

1483
00:54:29,920 --> 00:54:33,440
It is tedious manual work where you go through your records and fix them one by one.

1484
00:54:33,440 --> 00:54:35,160
Next, you need master data governance.

1485
00:54:35,160 --> 00:54:38,040
You cannot just clean the data once and hope it stays that way.

1486
00:54:38,040 --> 00:54:41,200
You need strict rules for how new data gets created from now on.

1487
00:54:41,200 --> 00:54:44,800
When someone adds a new vendor, you have to decide which fields are mandatory and what

1488
00:54:44,800 --> 00:54:46,400
naming style they must use.

1489
00:54:46,400 --> 00:54:49,280
You also need to know who approves that vendor before it hits the system.

1490
00:54:49,280 --> 00:54:53,080
Without these rules, you will fix the mess today only to see it return in six months because

1491
00:54:53,080 --> 00:54:55,680
people are still entering data without a standard.

1492
00:54:55,680 --> 00:54:59,320
Finally, you need consistency in what your data actually means.

1493
00:54:59,320 --> 00:55:03,480
When you label a leader's qualified, that word needs to mean the exact same thing across

1494
00:55:03,480 --> 00:55:04,520
the whole company.

1495
00:55:04,520 --> 00:55:09,360
If urgent means something different to every field team, the agent's reasoning will be all

1496
00:55:09,360 --> 00:55:10,760
over the place.

1497
00:55:10,760 --> 00:55:14,600
Agents think based on these values, so the definitions have to be identical everywhere.

1498
00:55:14,600 --> 00:55:16,400
This work takes time.

1499
00:55:16,400 --> 00:55:19,760
Realistically, you are looking at four to eight weeks of prep before you can deploy at

1500
00:55:19,760 --> 00:55:20,760
scale.

1501
00:55:20,760 --> 00:55:23,200
You cannot skip this just because you want to move fast.

1502
00:55:23,200 --> 00:55:26,360
If you try, you will launch on garbage data and get bad results.

1503
00:55:26,360 --> 00:55:29,160
Then you will have to stop everything and fix the data anyway.

1504
00:55:29,160 --> 00:55:33,400
You will end up wasting more time backtracking than you ever saved by rushing the start.

1505
00:55:33,400 --> 00:55:35,960
But once the data is cleaned, the whole dynamic shifts.

1506
00:55:35,960 --> 00:55:39,560
Accurate information stops being a chore and starts being a real asset.

1507
00:55:39,560 --> 00:55:43,480
Your agents become much more valuable because they are finally working with data they can

1508
00:55:43,480 --> 00:55:44,880
actually trust.

1509
00:55:44,880 --> 00:55:46,760
The change management reality.

1510
00:55:46,760 --> 00:55:48,160
Agents disrupt workflows.

1511
00:55:48,160 --> 00:55:51,440
The most important conversation in your company happens before the agents go live, not

1512
00:55:51,440 --> 00:55:52,440
after.

1513
00:55:52,440 --> 00:55:55,720
It is the talk between an operations leader and their team and it almost always starts

1514
00:55:55,720 --> 00:55:57,200
with a lot of anxiety.

1515
00:55:57,200 --> 00:56:01,720
The leader announces they are deploying an agent to handle 40% of the reconciliation work.

1516
00:56:01,720 --> 00:56:03,600
The reaction is usually predictable.

1517
00:56:03,600 --> 00:56:06,200
People hear that and immediately think their job is going away.

1518
00:56:06,200 --> 00:56:08,200
They feel like they are being replaced.

1519
00:56:08,200 --> 00:56:10,760
And because nobody likes that feeling, they start to resist.

1520
00:56:10,760 --> 00:56:12,480
They aren't being difficult or irrational.

1521
00:56:12,480 --> 00:56:16,240
They are reacting to something that sounds like a direct threat to their livelihood because

1522
00:56:16,240 --> 00:56:18,760
nobody explained what the change actually means.

1523
00:56:18,760 --> 00:56:20,880
This resistance pattern is a very real hurdle.

1524
00:56:20,880 --> 00:56:25,040
Teams worry that if an agent can do their tasks, the company won't need them in six months.

1525
00:56:25,040 --> 00:56:27,800
They start looking at their options and updating their resumes.

1526
00:56:27,800 --> 00:56:31,000
You won't lose your best people because they hate the new technology.

1527
00:56:31,000 --> 00:56:34,720
You will lose them because you didn't explain how their roles are actually changing.

1528
00:56:34,720 --> 00:56:36,760
Here is the reality you have to communicate.

1529
00:56:36,760 --> 00:56:39,800
Agents eliminate the boring work, not the expertise.

1530
00:56:39,800 --> 00:56:42,000
An agent does not replace a finance analyst.

1531
00:56:42,000 --> 00:56:44,600
It replaces the data entry part of their afternoon.

1532
00:56:44,600 --> 00:56:48,320
It takes over the repetitive matching and the simple patterns that don't require any real

1533
00:56:48,320 --> 00:56:49,320
thought.

1534
00:56:49,320 --> 00:56:52,280
The agent handles the routine while your analyst handles the exceptions.

1535
00:56:52,280 --> 00:56:56,160
They step in when something doesn't fit the mold and a human needs to figure out why.

1536
00:56:56,160 --> 00:56:57,320
That isn't replacing someone.

1537
00:56:57,320 --> 00:56:58,560
It is amplifying them.

1538
00:56:58,560 --> 00:57:02,640
You are taking a smart person and moving them away from chores so they can do work that

1539
00:57:02,640 --> 00:57:03,640
actually matters.

1540
00:57:03,640 --> 00:57:05,640
That shift in framing changes the whole mood.

1541
00:57:05,640 --> 00:57:08,920
Instead of telling someone their job is disappearing, you are telling them their job is

1542
00:57:08,920 --> 00:57:09,920
getting better.

1543
00:57:09,920 --> 00:57:13,280
Your analyst no longer has to spend three days a week matching invoices.

1544
00:57:13,280 --> 00:57:17,040
Now they can spend that time looking at why certain suppliers have so many errors.

1545
00:57:17,040 --> 00:57:19,720
They can find ways to fix the process at the source.

1546
00:57:19,720 --> 00:57:23,920
That is better work that uses their brain instead of just their patience.

1547
00:57:23,920 --> 00:57:26,560
Your communication strategy has to start there.

1548
00:57:26,560 --> 00:57:29,880
Start making it about the software and start making it about the person.

1549
00:57:29,880 --> 00:57:33,640
Tell them they will have two fewer hours of data entry every day.

1550
00:57:33,640 --> 00:57:36,960
Explain that this gives them time for the high level analysis their manager has been asking

1551
00:57:36,960 --> 00:57:37,960
for.

1552
00:57:37,960 --> 00:57:42,200
When you frame it as less time on repetitive tasks and more time thinking about the business,

1553
00:57:42,200 --> 00:57:43,520
the message actually lands.

1554
00:57:43,520 --> 00:57:45,880
The conversation moves from a threat to an opportunity.

1555
00:57:45,880 --> 00:57:48,040
Once the message is clear, you run a pilot.

1556
00:57:48,040 --> 00:57:51,480
Do not try to change the entire company at the same time because that is a recipe for

1557
00:57:51,480 --> 00:57:52,480
chaos.

1558
00:57:52,480 --> 00:57:56,360
Pick one high volume process that is causing a lot of pain and run the agent there first.

1559
00:57:56,360 --> 00:57:57,840
Consider what actually happens on the ground.

1560
00:57:57,840 --> 00:58:02,600
If reconciliation time drops by 70% and the team handles the transition well, you finally

1561
00:58:02,600 --> 00:58:03,600
have proof.

1562
00:58:03,600 --> 00:58:06,360
You can show everyone exactly what changed and the impact it had.

1563
00:58:06,360 --> 00:58:08,520
That evidence makes the next rollout much easier.

1564
00:58:08,520 --> 00:58:10,800
The training you provide needs to be very specific.

1565
00:58:10,800 --> 00:58:14,040
You aren't teaching people how to do the work the agent is already doing.

1566
00:58:14,040 --> 00:58:16,200
You are teaching them how to manage the agent.

1567
00:58:16,200 --> 00:58:19,760
They need to know how to review its decisions and how to tell if the performance is starting

1568
00:58:19,760 --> 00:58:20,760
to slip.

1569
00:58:20,760 --> 00:58:23,400
They need to understand the new workflow for handling exceptions.

1570
00:58:23,400 --> 00:58:25,600
This is a different skill set than manual reconciliation.

1571
00:58:25,600 --> 00:58:27,280
It is about oversight.

1572
00:58:27,280 --> 00:58:30,640
People usually prefer this kind of training because it feels like they are gaining a new

1573
00:58:30,640 --> 00:58:33,080
valuable skill rather than being pushed out.

1574
00:58:33,080 --> 00:58:35,000
The timeline for this is longer than you think.

1575
00:58:35,000 --> 00:58:38,040
Expect it to take 6-12 weeks from the launch date to reach full adoption.

1576
00:58:38,040 --> 00:58:41,960
You can't just flip a switch and expect everyone to be comfortable supervising a machine

1577
00:58:41,960 --> 00:58:43,120
overnight.

1578
00:58:43,120 --> 00:58:46,360
They need time to see that the agent actually works and that it isn't just a passing

1579
00:58:46,360 --> 00:58:47,360
fare.

1580
00:58:47,360 --> 00:58:49,160
They need to build confidence in the new way of working.

1581
00:58:49,160 --> 00:58:51,120
During those weeks you have to keep talking.

1582
00:58:51,120 --> 00:58:54,560
Show the progress, celebrate the small wins and answer concerns directly instead of

1583
00:58:54,560 --> 00:58:55,560
ignoring them.

1584
00:58:55,560 --> 00:58:57,800
This is where these projects actually succeed or fail.

1585
00:58:57,800 --> 00:58:59,560
It isn't about the code or the servers.

1586
00:58:59,560 --> 00:59:03,960
It is about whether you actually helped your people move through the change.

1587
00:59:03,960 --> 00:59:05,800
The security and compliance story.

1588
00:59:05,800 --> 00:59:07,400
Agents don't bypass governance.

1589
00:59:07,400 --> 00:59:11,800
CFOs and compliance officers usually have one big question when they look at agents.

1590
00:59:11,800 --> 00:59:13,640
Are we creating a massive compliance risk?

1591
00:59:13,640 --> 00:59:14,640
The answer is no.

1592
00:59:14,640 --> 00:59:16,240
But only if you set them up correctly.

1593
00:59:16,240 --> 00:59:17,960
The core rule is simple.

1594
00:59:17,960 --> 00:59:21,800
Agents operate within the exact same security boundaries as your employees.

1595
00:59:21,800 --> 00:59:24,840
They aren't a separate system that gets to skip your governance.

1596
00:59:24,840 --> 00:59:29,400
If an agent is assigned to your finance team, it can only see and touch data that a finance

1597
00:59:29,400 --> 00:59:30,800
person can see and touch.

1598
00:59:30,800 --> 00:59:34,960
A sales agent can't suddenly look at customer payment histories because sales users don't

1599
00:59:34,960 --> 00:59:36,200
have that permission.

1600
00:59:36,200 --> 00:59:39,640
Row-level security applies to agents the same way it applies to your staff.

1601
00:59:39,640 --> 00:59:43,960
If a manager in Denver is restricted to seeing Denver opportunities, an agent running under

1602
00:59:43,960 --> 00:59:45,960
that role is restricted to that same view.

1603
00:59:45,960 --> 00:59:48,880
This isn't a special agent mode you have to configure.

1604
00:59:48,880 --> 00:59:52,040
It's the same security model your company is already running.

1605
00:59:52,040 --> 00:59:53,920
But here's the problem most people expect.

1606
00:59:53,920 --> 00:59:56,400
They think they'll have to build new security structures.

1607
00:59:56,400 --> 00:59:58,400
In reality, you're just using what you already have.

1608
00:59:58,400 --> 01:00:02,720
Your IT team has already spent years defining what different roles can see and do and agents

1609
01:00:02,720 --> 01:00:04,400
simply inherit that work.

1610
01:00:04,400 --> 01:00:08,280
This means adding agents doesn't create a new administrative nightmare for your security

1611
01:00:08,280 --> 01:00:09,280
team.

1612
01:00:09,280 --> 01:00:11,960
You aren't managing two different sets of rules for humans and machines.

1613
01:00:11,960 --> 01:00:14,080
There is one set of rules and everyone follows them.

1614
01:00:14,080 --> 01:00:17,520
The audit trail is where compliance actually becomes a strength.

1615
01:00:17,520 --> 01:00:19,640
Every single decision an agent makes is logged.

1616
01:00:19,640 --> 01:00:22,280
Not just the final result but the context behind it.

1617
01:00:22,280 --> 01:00:26,040
When a reconciliation agent suggests a journal entry, the log shows every step.

1618
01:00:26,040 --> 01:00:30,480
It shows the sub-ledger at checked, the g-l-it-compared, the tolerance rules it applied and the exact

1619
01:00:30,480 --> 01:00:31,880
discrepancy it found.

1620
01:00:31,880 --> 01:00:36,800
If an auditor asks why a specific entry was created, you have the entire decision chain ready.

1621
01:00:36,800 --> 01:00:38,600
You don't have to piece it together from memory.

1622
01:00:38,600 --> 01:00:42,440
You don't have to ask an analyst if they remember why they posted something six months ago.

1623
01:00:42,440 --> 01:00:43,640
The system has the answer.

1624
01:00:43,640 --> 01:00:45,600
This is actually a compliance improvement.

1625
01:00:45,600 --> 01:00:47,440
Human decisions are often a black box.

1626
01:00:47,440 --> 01:00:50,480
Someone matches an invoice, hits a proof and moves on.

1627
01:00:50,480 --> 01:00:54,120
When auditors ask why later that person has to try and remember their logic, maybe they

1628
01:00:54,120 --> 01:00:55,560
do and maybe they don't.

1629
01:00:55,560 --> 01:00:58,760
But an agent's decisions are always documented and always reproducible.

1630
01:00:58,760 --> 01:01:03,000
If you need to prove that a policy was followed, the audit trail is your proof.

1631
01:01:03,000 --> 01:01:06,040
Approval workflows are the guardrails that keep agents from going rogue.

1632
01:01:06,040 --> 01:01:09,640
A procurement agent can automatically update a routine delivery date because that's a low

1633
01:01:09,640 --> 01:01:10,840
risk task.

1634
01:01:10,840 --> 01:01:15,200
But that same agent can't authorize a new vendor or change a contract on its own.

1635
01:01:15,200 --> 01:01:17,040
Those actions require a human signature.

1636
01:01:17,040 --> 01:01:19,200
The workflow is where the human gate sits.

1637
01:01:19,200 --> 01:01:22,840
The agent does the heavy lifting by gathering info and proposing an action, but it doesn't

1638
01:01:22,840 --> 01:01:25,400
pull the trigger on anything that exceeds your thresholds.

1639
01:01:25,400 --> 01:01:28,920
It escalates the case to the right person with all the context they need.

1640
01:01:28,920 --> 01:01:31,520
That person makes the call and only then does the action happen.

1641
01:01:31,520 --> 01:01:34,840
The human stays in the loop where it matters.

1642
01:01:34,840 --> 01:01:38,800
Data loss prevention policies also apply to agents exactly like they do to users.

1643
01:01:38,800 --> 01:01:42,680
An agent cannot send sensitive data through an unapproved channel because your DLP rules

1644
01:01:42,680 --> 01:01:43,680
won't allow it.

1645
01:01:43,680 --> 01:01:47,680
If you have a policy that stops customer data from leaving your internal systems, that rule

1646
01:01:47,680 --> 01:01:50,640
holds whether a human or an agent tries to move it.

1647
01:01:50,640 --> 01:01:54,240
You aren't giving agents special keys to bypass your data protection.

1648
01:01:54,240 --> 01:01:58,480
In regulated industries like finance or healthcare, agents actually make things safer because

1649
01:01:58,480 --> 01:01:59,640
they are consistent.

1650
01:01:59,640 --> 01:02:03,400
A human compliance analyst might get it right 98% of the time.

1651
01:02:03,400 --> 01:02:06,880
They get tired, they make judgment calls, or they just miss a detail.

1652
01:02:06,880 --> 01:02:10,080
An agent applies the rule perfectly every single time.

1653
01:02:10,080 --> 01:02:13,680
However, that isn't just a neutral change, it's a massive upgrade.

1654
01:02:13,680 --> 01:02:17,480
So what's actually happening is that the risk isn't the agent, it's the deployment.

1655
01:02:17,480 --> 01:02:21,880
If you ignore the governance tools, skip the approval steps and just let agents run wild

1656
01:02:21,880 --> 01:02:23,840
then yes you've created a risk.

1657
01:02:23,840 --> 01:02:26,640
But that is a choice, not a flaw in the technology.

1658
01:02:26,640 --> 01:02:30,520
Agents with governance are significantly safer than humans without it.

1659
01:02:30,520 --> 01:02:32,160
The competitive angle.

1660
01:02:32,160 --> 01:02:34,160
Your competitors are already moving.

1661
01:02:34,160 --> 01:02:36,800
This isn't a conversation about what might happen in the future.

1662
01:02:36,800 --> 01:02:42,280
This is about right now. By the end of 2026, 40% of enterprise apps will have task-specific

1663
01:02:42,280 --> 01:02:43,760
agents built right into them.

1664
01:02:43,760 --> 01:02:45,400
That isn't a guess from a software salesman.

1665
01:02:45,400 --> 01:02:49,240
That is Godness assessment based on what companies are actually building and buying today.

1666
01:02:49,240 --> 01:02:51,800
We aren't talking about science projects in a lab.

1667
01:02:51,800 --> 01:02:55,720
We are talking about real agents running real business processes in the real world.

1668
01:02:55,720 --> 01:02:58,600
That number matters because it defines the world you're competing in.

1669
01:02:58,600 --> 01:03:00,360
Think about what that looks like on the ground.

1670
01:03:00,360 --> 01:03:02,600
Your competitors are splitting into two groups.

1671
01:03:02,600 --> 01:03:04,760
One group is using agents and the other isn't.

1672
01:03:04,760 --> 01:03:07,120
The ones using agents are simply moving faster.

1673
01:03:07,120 --> 01:03:11,000
Their sales teams qualify leads in half the time and their finance teams close the books

1674
01:03:11,000 --> 01:03:12,240
in a third of the time.

1675
01:03:12,240 --> 01:03:16,400
Their procurement teams respond to suppliers instantly instead of waiting 24 hours for an email

1676
01:03:16,400 --> 01:03:17,400
reply.

1677
01:03:17,400 --> 01:03:18,840
That speed advantage compounds.

1678
01:03:18,840 --> 01:03:22,880
A sales team that qualifies leads twice as fast can chase twice as many deals with the same

1679
01:03:22,880 --> 01:03:23,960
number of people.

1680
01:03:23,960 --> 01:03:28,320
A finance team that closes faster gives the CEO real numbers days earlier.

1681
01:03:28,320 --> 01:03:32,400
A procurement team that handles messages instantly can manage more vendors without getting

1682
01:03:32,400 --> 01:03:33,400
overwhelmed.

1683
01:03:33,400 --> 01:03:34,400
That's the gap.

1684
01:03:34,400 --> 01:03:36,840
It's about which software has more buttons.

1685
01:03:36,840 --> 01:03:41,680
It's about operational speed and speed turns into lower costs and better customer experiences.

1686
01:03:41,680 --> 01:03:43,840
For your customers, your speed feels like better service.

1687
01:03:43,840 --> 01:03:47,240
When a support agent routes a customer to the right person immediately, it feels like

1688
01:03:47,240 --> 01:03:49,200
you actually care about their time.

1689
01:03:49,200 --> 01:03:52,880
When a problem gets fixed on the first call instead of being escalated three times, that's

1690
01:03:52,880 --> 01:03:54,280
how you win loyalty.

1691
01:03:54,280 --> 01:03:57,880
Customers don't see your back office tech but they definitely feel the speed and accuracy

1692
01:03:57,880 --> 01:03:59,360
of how you treat them.

1693
01:03:59,360 --> 01:04:02,400
For your business, that efficiency shows up in your margins.

1694
01:04:02,400 --> 01:04:06,480
You get a lower cost per transaction and better working capital because your cycles are shorter.

1695
01:04:06,480 --> 01:04:08,960
You get more work done without having to hire more people.

1696
01:04:08,960 --> 01:04:13,280
A competitor using agents can serve more customers at a lower cost, which means they can

1697
01:04:13,280 --> 01:04:15,960
undercut your price or spend more on innovation.

1698
01:04:15,960 --> 01:04:17,080
These aren't small wins.

1699
01:04:17,080 --> 01:04:19,200
Over time, they determine who wins the market.

1700
01:04:19,200 --> 01:04:22,080
And there is a talent side to this that most people miss.

1701
01:04:22,080 --> 01:04:24,760
Companies that automate the boring stuff attract better people.

1702
01:04:24,760 --> 01:04:28,920
A standard procurement job is often just managing spreadsheets and emails, which isn't exactly

1703
01:04:28,920 --> 01:04:29,920
exciting work.

1704
01:04:29,920 --> 01:04:33,040
They don't have to work with people who just execute, but a job where an agent handles the routine

1705
01:04:33,040 --> 01:04:36,360
stuff so the human can focus on strategy and relationships.

1706
01:04:36,360 --> 01:04:37,840
That's a job people actually want.

1707
01:04:37,840 --> 01:04:39,880
It attracts thinkers, not just doers.

1708
01:04:39,880 --> 01:04:42,760
Your competitors who move fast will have this advantage.

1709
01:04:42,760 --> 01:04:46,800
They will hire the talent you can't get because your roles are still defined by drudgery

1710
01:04:46,800 --> 01:04:47,800
instead of judgment.

1711
01:04:47,800 --> 01:04:49,720
The shift is that this is becoming the baseline.

1712
01:04:49,720 --> 01:04:51,680
It's no longer a nice to have feature.

1713
01:04:51,680 --> 01:04:56,280
In five years, nobody will ask if you have agents, they'll ask how good your agent workflows

1714
01:04:56,280 --> 01:04:57,280
are.

1715
01:04:57,280 --> 01:05:00,120
The results start now will be three years ahead of the ones that wait.

1716
01:05:00,120 --> 01:05:02,440
And in your industry, three years is a lifetime.

1717
01:05:02,440 --> 01:05:03,600
The reality is simple.

1718
01:05:03,600 --> 01:05:05,720
Your company will eventually use agents.

1719
01:05:05,720 --> 01:05:10,360
The only real decision is whether you start now or spend the next two years playing catch-up

1720
01:05:10,360 --> 01:05:13,680
while your competitors move at a speed you can't match.

1721
01:05:13,680 --> 01:05:14,680
The road map.

1722
01:05:14,680 --> 01:05:15,960
How to start moving?

1723
01:05:15,960 --> 01:05:17,480
You understand the landscape now.

1724
01:05:17,480 --> 01:05:20,520
You know why agents matter, how they work and how to govern them.

1725
01:05:20,520 --> 01:05:23,640
But understanding a concept and actually starting are two different things.

1726
01:05:23,640 --> 01:05:26,960
Most organizations get stuck because they try to plan for everything at once.

1727
01:05:26,960 --> 01:05:27,960
Where it breaks.

1728
01:05:27,960 --> 01:05:29,160
You don't need a perfect plan.

1729
01:05:29,160 --> 01:05:33,320
You need a road map that moves you from where you are now to where you need to be.

1730
01:05:33,320 --> 01:05:35,240
This road map breaks into four phases.

1731
01:05:35,240 --> 01:05:36,960
These aren't strict dates on a calendar.

1732
01:05:36,960 --> 01:05:38,120
They are decision points.

1733
01:05:38,120 --> 01:05:39,400
And the model is simple.

1734
01:05:39,400 --> 01:05:42,880
Early phases pay for the later ones through the ROI you generate.

1735
01:05:42,880 --> 01:05:44,480
Phase one covers your first three months.

1736
01:05:44,480 --> 01:05:45,480
Pick one process.

1737
01:05:45,480 --> 01:05:48,560
Not five, not a massive pilot that touches every department, just one.

1738
01:05:48,560 --> 01:05:50,720
It needs to be high volume and high impact.

1739
01:05:50,720 --> 01:05:54,560
It should be a process that is causing real operational pain for your team right now.

1740
01:05:54,560 --> 01:05:57,520
If you are in finance, look at reconciliation if you are in sales.

1741
01:05:57,520 --> 01:05:58,640
Look at lead qualification.

1742
01:05:58,640 --> 01:06:01,200
If you are in procurement, look at supplier communications.

1743
01:06:01,200 --> 01:06:03,520
You need a process where you already know the numbers.

1744
01:06:03,520 --> 01:06:06,840
You know how much time it takes, how much it costs and how often errors happen.

1745
01:06:06,840 --> 01:06:07,840
Write those numbers down.

1746
01:06:07,840 --> 01:06:09,240
This is your before snapshot.

1747
01:06:09,240 --> 01:06:10,240
Then.

1748
01:06:10,240 --> 01:06:11,240
Deploy your agent.

1749
01:06:11,240 --> 01:06:12,240
Keep the scope tight.

1750
01:06:12,240 --> 01:06:15,280
You aren't trying to automate the entire workflow from start to finish.

1751
01:06:15,280 --> 01:06:18,040
You are only automating the parts that agents do best.

1752
01:06:18,040 --> 01:06:19,160
The patent matching.

1753
01:06:19,160 --> 01:06:20,360
The data enrichment.

1754
01:06:20,360 --> 01:06:21,800
The decision framework.

1755
01:06:21,800 --> 01:06:25,680
Let that agent run for eight weeks and document every single thing that happens.

1756
01:06:25,680 --> 01:06:27,920
Phase two happens between months, four and six.

1757
01:06:27,920 --> 01:06:29,440
This is where you prove the impact.

1758
01:06:29,440 --> 01:06:31,200
Go back to those numbers you wrote down.

1759
01:06:31,200 --> 01:06:32,640
Did the cycle time actually drop?

1760
01:06:32,640 --> 01:06:34,640
By how much?

1761
01:06:34,640 --> 01:06:36,000
What does the error rate look like now?

1762
01:06:36,000 --> 01:06:38,680
You need to know if the agent is making good decisions.

1763
01:06:38,680 --> 01:06:41,520
Or if it's just escalating every little thing to a human.

1764
01:06:41,520 --> 01:06:45,080
This is the moment you learn if your pilot worked or if you need to pivot.

1765
01:06:45,080 --> 01:06:47,760
Most organizations see a clear improvement here.

1766
01:06:47,760 --> 01:06:48,760
Reconciliation gets faster.

1767
01:06:48,760 --> 01:06:51,000
Lead qualification gets more accurate.

1768
01:06:51,000 --> 01:06:53,680
Reconciliation shifts from slow daily batches to real-time action.

1769
01:06:53,680 --> 01:06:55,800
Once you see that win, you expand.

1770
01:06:55,800 --> 01:06:57,960
But don't jump to another department yet.

1771
01:06:57,960 --> 01:07:01,040
Move to the adjacent processes that look similar to your first one.

1772
01:07:01,040 --> 01:07:05,400
If you started with reconciliation, move to accounts payable, reconciliation next.

1773
01:07:05,400 --> 01:07:08,480
You're using the same agent framework and the same governance.

1774
01:07:08,480 --> 01:07:09,840
Only the data changes.

1775
01:07:09,840 --> 01:07:11,480
You aren't learning a new system.

1776
01:07:11,480 --> 01:07:13,400
You're just applying what already works.

1777
01:07:13,400 --> 01:07:15,800
Phase three spans months seven through twelve.

1778
01:07:15,800 --> 01:07:17,480
This is the shift.

1779
01:07:17,480 --> 01:07:19,200
Governance is no longer an afterthought.

1780
01:07:19,200 --> 01:07:20,200
It becomes formal.

1781
01:07:20,200 --> 01:07:21,640
You aren't in pilot mode anymore.

1782
01:07:21,640 --> 01:07:22,960
You are in production at scale.

1783
01:07:22,960 --> 01:07:24,240
Agent 365 is live.

1784
01:07:24,240 --> 01:07:27,640
You've built an agent registry so you can see exactly what is running, who owns it, and

1785
01:07:27,640 --> 01:07:28,640
how it's performing.

1786
01:07:28,640 --> 01:07:31,400
You've set up the approval workflows for high-risk actions.

1787
01:07:31,400 --> 01:07:34,400
You've configured the audit logs and assigned security roles.

1788
01:07:34,400 --> 01:07:36,280
But more importantly, you've trained your people.

1789
01:07:36,280 --> 01:07:37,880
They aren't doing the manual work anymore.

1790
01:07:37,880 --> 01:07:39,400
They are supervising the agents.

1791
01:07:39,400 --> 01:07:41,560
This is where you measure ROI formally.

1792
01:07:41,560 --> 01:07:44,280
The financial case for the next step should be obvious by now.

1793
01:07:44,280 --> 01:07:47,920
If your reconciliation agent saved 200 hours a month, the math is done.

1794
01:07:47,920 --> 01:07:50,160
That ROI pays for everything that comes next.

1795
01:07:50,160 --> 01:07:51,840
Phase four is year two and beyond.

1796
01:07:51,840 --> 01:07:53,840
Now, you're thinking about orchestration.

1797
01:07:53,840 --> 01:07:57,720
Sales agents are talking to finance agents to handle the quote to cash cycle.

1798
01:07:57,720 --> 01:08:01,160
Procurement agents are coordinating with supply chain agents to manage orders.

1799
01:08:01,160 --> 01:08:03,400
You aren't just building individual agents anymore.

1800
01:08:03,400 --> 01:08:05,880
You're building an ecosystem.

1801
01:08:05,880 --> 01:08:09,880
Specialized agents are handing off tasks to each other and collaborating on complex work.

1802
01:08:09,880 --> 01:08:11,560
Full maturity takes about two years.

1803
01:08:11,560 --> 01:08:13,160
But that isn't two years of heavy lifting.

1804
01:08:13,160 --> 01:08:16,640
It's two years of slowly expanding your scope once you've proved the model works.

1805
01:08:16,640 --> 01:08:19,000
The timeline for ROI is straightforward.

1806
01:08:19,000 --> 01:08:21,280
It's a big project to see a return within your first 12 months.

1807
01:08:21,280 --> 01:08:22,280
Full payback.

1808
01:08:22,280 --> 01:08:25,440
Where the agents have saved enough to cover their entire setup cost.

1809
01:08:25,440 --> 01:08:26,720
Usually happens in year one.

1810
01:08:26,720 --> 01:08:29,200
The financial case is positive from month four onward.

1811
01:08:29,200 --> 01:08:30,560
That's why expanding makes sense.

1812
01:08:30,560 --> 01:08:31,720
But here's the problem.

1813
01:08:31,720 --> 01:08:33,680
Most people wait.

1814
01:08:33,680 --> 01:08:34,960
They wait for perfect data.

1815
01:08:34,960 --> 01:08:36,400
They wait for perfect governance.

1816
01:08:36,400 --> 01:08:37,400
Don't do that.

1817
01:08:37,400 --> 01:08:39,800
Start with the process that hurts the most right now.

1818
01:08:39,800 --> 01:08:41,160
Fix the data as you go.

1819
01:08:41,160 --> 01:08:42,400
Build the governance as you learn.

1820
01:08:42,400 --> 01:08:45,960
You will move faster than anyone trying to be perfect before they start.

1821
01:08:45,960 --> 01:08:49,520
The shift from systems of record to systems of action is real.

1822
01:08:49,520 --> 01:08:50,840
It's happening right now.

1823
01:08:50,840 --> 01:08:52,800
Your organization will make this transition.

1824
01:08:52,800 --> 01:08:55,440
The only variable is when the agents we've talked about.

1825
01:08:55,440 --> 01:08:58,200
Sales, reconciliation, customer intent.

1826
01:08:58,200 --> 01:09:00,480
They solve structural problems in how you operate.

1827
01:09:00,480 --> 01:09:02,480
They work because they are grounded in data.

1828
01:09:02,480 --> 01:09:03,680
Your actual business data.

1829
01:09:03,680 --> 01:09:07,280
They are safe because they live inside your existing security and order rules.

1830
01:09:07,280 --> 01:09:11,440
And they are valuable because they free your teams to do work that actually requires a human

1831
01:09:11,440 --> 01:09:12,440
brain.

1832
01:09:12,440 --> 01:09:13,440
The organization is moving now.

1833
01:09:13,440 --> 01:09:14,880
We'll outpace everyone else.

1834
01:09:14,880 --> 01:09:16,440
The advantage is speed.

1835
01:09:16,440 --> 01:09:17,960
Start with one process.

1836
01:09:17,960 --> 01:09:18,960
Measure it.

1837
01:09:18,960 --> 01:09:19,960
Scale it.

Mirko Peters Profile Photo

Founder of m365.fm, m365.show and m365con.net

Mirko Peters is a Microsoft 365 expert, content creator, and founder of m365.fm, a platform dedicated to sharing practical insights on modern workplace technologies. His work focuses on Microsoft 365 governance, security, collaboration, and real-world implementation strategies.

Through his podcast and written content, Mirko provides hands-on guidance for IT professionals, architects, and business leaders navigating the complexities of Microsoft 365. He is known for translating complex topics into clear, actionable advice, often highlighting common mistakes and overlooked risks in real-world environments.

With a strong emphasis on community contribution and knowledge sharing, Mirko is actively building a platform that connects experts, shares experiences, and helps organizations get the most out of their Microsoft 365 investments.