June 3, 2026

Leading AI, Delivering Transformation, and Building Community with Areti Iles [MVP]

Leading AI, Delivering Transformation, and Building Community with Areti Iles [MVP]
Leading AI, Delivering Transformation, and Building Community with Areti Iles [MVP]
M365 FM Podcast
Leading AI, Delivering Transformation, and Building Community with Areti Iles [MVP]
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconYoutube Music podcast player iconSpreaker podcast player iconPodchaser podcast player iconAmazon Music podcast player icon

In this episode of the M365 FM Podcast, Mirko Peters welcomes Areti Iles, Microsoft MVP, Head of Professional Services at Telefonica Tech’s AI Business Solutions Division, community leader, mentor, conference organizer, and one of the most respected voices in AI governance, compliance, Dynamics 365, and Power Platform. Together, they explore enterprise transformation, Agentic AI, leadership, responsible AI adoption, and the future of work in an AI-powered world. Areti shares her remarkable journey from working in IT support to becoming a trusted leader responsible for delivering complex Microsoft technology solutions across global organizations. What started as an introduction to Microsoft Dynamics CRM evolved into a career spanning consulting, solution architecture, project leadership, executive management, and AI strategy. Her story demonstrates how curiosity, continuous learning, and community involvement can transform a career and create opportunities far beyond what many professionals initially imagine.

HOW DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION CAREERS ARE BUILT

One of the recurring themes throughout the conversation is that successful careers are rarely planned from the beginning. Areti explains how many of the most important opportunities in her career emerged unexpectedly. From becoming a consultant to leading professional services teams, she highlights the importance of stepping outside comfort zones, embracing uncertainty, and applying for roles even when you do not meet every requirement. She also discusses the leadership lessons she learned while transitioning from technical delivery into executive leadership. Moving from building solutions to overseeing entire delivery organizations provided new perspectives on strategy, customer relationships, business value, and organizational transformation.

WHY ENTERPRISE PROJECTS SUCCEED OR FAIL

Drawing from years of experience leading Dynamics 365, Power Platform, ERP, and AI projects, Areti explains that technology is rarely the reason projects fail. Instead, the biggest challenges often include:

  • Lack of stakeholder engagement
  • Poor change management
  • Insufficient executive sponsorship
  • Unrealistic expectations
  • Limited SME availability
  • Scope creep
  • Weak user adoption strategies
She emphasizes that go-live should never be considered the finish line. The true success of any transformation project is measured by business outcomes, adoption rates, productivity improvements, and long-term value realization after deployment.

THE PEOPLE SIDE OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION

A major takeaway from the episode is that technology projects are fundamentally people projects. Organizations often focus heavily on implementation while underestimating the effort required to prepare users for change. Areti discusses the importance of involving users early, gathering continuous feedback, creating ownership within the business, and ensuring employees understand not only how new systems work but why they matter. Successful transformation requires:
  • Executive buy-in
  • Strong communication plans
  • User engagement
  • Continuous feedback loops
  • Effective training
  • Long-term adoption strategies
Without these elements, even technically successful projects can fail to deliver business value.

UNDERSTANDING AGENTIC AI

AI dominates today's technology conversations, but many professionals still struggle to understand what Agentic AI actually means. Areti provides a practical explanation, describing Agentic AI as a collection of autonomous systems capable of planning, making decisions, and executing actions to achieve specific goals. Unlike traditional AI assistants that simply respond to prompts, agents can independently perform tasks, orchestrate workflows, and interact with systems on behalf of users.

HOW AI IS CHANGING THE WAY WE WORK

The discussion explores how AI is fundamentally changing the relationship between humans and technology. Historically, people sat at the center of business systems, making every decision and driving every process. Agentic AI introduces a future where humans increasingly manage exceptions while intelligent systems handle routine activities autonomously. Topics discussed include:
  • Autonomous workflows
  • AI-powered decision making
  • Human oversight
  • AI trust and governance
  • Organizational readiness
  • Workforce transformation
  • Future operating models
Areti explains that while the technology is exciting, organizations must remain thoughtful about how much autonomy they grant to AI systems.

AI STRATEGY VS BUSINESS STRATEGY

One of the most insightful moments of the conversation centers around a common mistake organizations make when adopting AI. According to Areti, AI should never become the strategy itself. Instead, organizations should focus on their business objectives and use AI as a tool to achieve them more effectively. She warns against implementing AI simply because competitors are doing so and encourages leaders to begin with business problems rather than technology solutions. This perspective is especially important as organizations rush to adopt emerging AI capabilities without clearly defining the outcomes they hope to achieve. AI

GOVERNANCE, COMPLIANCE, AND RESPONSIBLE AI

As AI adoption accelerates, governance and compliance have become board-level concerns. Areti provides an in-depth overview of the evolving regulatory landscape and explains why organizations must begin preparing now rather than waiting for regulations to mature. She discusses the growing importance of AI inventories, risk classification, governance frameworks, human oversight, documentation, and auditability. Key governance priorities include:
  • AI inventories
  • Risk assessments
  • Human oversight
  • Transparency
  • Monitoring
  • Documentation
  • Data protection
  • Compliance reporting
Organizations that establish these foundations early will be better positioned to innovate responsibly and scale AI initiatives successfully.

NAVIGATING THE EU AI ACT

The European Union AI Act remains one of the most significant regulatory developments in artificial intelligence. During the discussion, Areti explains:
  • What the AI Act means for businesses
  • Which organizations may be affected
  • Why AI literacy matters
  • How compliance requirements are evolving
  • What leaders should prioritize today
She stresses that organizations should not view compliance as a barrier to innovation but rather as an opportunity to build trustworthy and sustainable AI practices.

MICROSOFT'SAPPROACH TO RESPONSIBLE AI

The conversation also explores how Microsoft technologies can help organizations implement secure and compliant AI solutions. Areti discusses the role of:
  • Microsoft Purview
  • Microsoft Defender
  • Azure AI Foundry
  • Compliance Manager
  • Data Loss Prevention
  • AI Monitoring
  • Security Controls


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-fm-modern-work-security-and-productivity-with-microsoft-365--6704921/support.

🚀 Want to be part of m365.fm?

Then stop just listening… and start showing up.

👉 Connect with me on LinkedIn and let’s make something happen:

  • 🎙️ Be a podcast guest and share your story
  • 🎧 Host your own episode (yes, seriously)
  • 💡 Pitch topics the community actually wants to hear
  • 🌍 Build your personal brand in the Microsoft 365 space

This isn’t just a podcast — it’s a platform for people who take action.

🔥 Most people wait. The best ones don’t.

👉 Connect with me on LinkedIn and send me a message:
"I want in"

Let’s build something awesome 👊

1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,120
Hello everyone and welcome back to the M365FM podcast.

2
00:00:06,120 --> 00:00:11,120
Today's guest is someone who has built an incredible reputation across both the Microsoft

3
00:00:11,120 --> 00:00:14,000
community and enterprise technology landscape.

4
00:00:14,000 --> 00:00:20,200
With over 15 years in technology sector, she is currently the head of professional services

5
00:00:20,200 --> 00:00:27,160
with Telephonica, takes AI business solutions division and Microsoft MVP in customer experience

6
00:00:27,160 --> 00:00:28,640
and power apps.

7
00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:35,520
Through her career, she delivered complex dynamic 365 and power platform solution to major

8
00:00:35,520 --> 00:00:42,920
FTSE's organizations while also becoming one of the most recognizable community leaders

9
00:00:42,920 --> 00:00:43,920
in Europe.

10
00:00:43,920 --> 00:00:52,160
She serves on Microsoft Global User Group Committee, responding, representing Europe,

11
00:00:52,160 --> 00:01:01,320
both the real thing and the London All Day Dynamics 365 and Power Platform User Group helps

12
00:01:01,320 --> 00:01:07,880
organize the Scottish Submit course of the Power Delivery podcast, Medvo with the Women

13
00:01:07,880 --> 00:01:13,800
in Power Platform and even, yeah, animal as a part of the UK delegation of the United

14
00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:16,640
Nation Commission on the status of women.

15
00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:24,680
On top of all the CVK respected boys on an eye-lead organization, compliance, governance and

16
00:01:24,680 --> 00:01:30,400
responsible adoption, I'd be welcome to the show.

17
00:01:30,400 --> 00:01:32,880
Thank you for having me, it's great to be here.

18
00:01:32,880 --> 00:01:35,480
Yeah, I hope I have forgotten anything.

19
00:01:35,480 --> 00:01:41,520
Oh, God, I don't know maybe, but yes, I don't say no to anything if anyone has a guest

20
00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:44,120
from that list and thank you for that lovely intro.

21
00:01:44,120 --> 00:01:46,440
Yeah, I'm involved in a lot of things, but I love it.

22
00:01:46,440 --> 00:01:47,440
It keeps me busy.

23
00:01:47,440 --> 00:01:55,160
Yeah, for those who know the MVP speaker and community leader, Virgin Avarti, tell us about

24
00:01:55,160 --> 00:02:00,760
the person before all that, how did your journey and technology begin?

25
00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:07,360
Yeah, so it happens to me in the way that it does for most people I find when I ask them

26
00:02:07,360 --> 00:02:11,320
about their stories and how they can involve the Microsoft platform.

27
00:02:11,320 --> 00:02:16,360
It's a case of doing a job and then somehow interacting with the software and realizing

28
00:02:16,360 --> 00:02:18,600
you quite like it and want to get more involved.

29
00:02:18,600 --> 00:02:20,520
That was definitely the case for me.

30
00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:27,080
So I was working, having finished my degree in my master's, I went into a job into IT support

31
00:02:27,080 --> 00:02:31,320
and I was working for a facilities management company in the UK, which is where I'm based.

32
00:02:31,320 --> 00:02:39,760
And as part of a change in the business and acquiring a new business to bring into our

33
00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:44,200
current portfolio businesses in the facilities management company, they were looking to

34
00:02:44,200 --> 00:02:50,840
introduce a CRM system and we chose Dynamics 365, well, the Uniseer as it was at the time

35
00:02:50,840 --> 00:02:51,840
to implement it.

36
00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:56,280
And I worked with a Microsoft partner at the time as the product owner effectively to create

37
00:02:56,280 --> 00:03:00,720
that solution with them and test it and do the data migration and do the go live and

38
00:03:00,720 --> 00:03:02,720
eventually support it.

39
00:03:02,720 --> 00:03:07,880
And as part of that process, I just really enjoyed creating the IT system and I got really

40
00:03:07,880 --> 00:03:12,960
heavily involved in the partner in the consultants I was working with joke that, you know, I should

41
00:03:12,960 --> 00:03:16,920
do this because I was really good and I was getting it and I was really enjoying it.

42
00:03:16,920 --> 00:03:19,120
And I didn't really do anything about it at the time.

43
00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:21,560
I was very much enjoying where I was.

44
00:03:21,560 --> 00:03:28,600
But over the years, then I moved on to other organizations as a Dynamics CRM manager, systems

45
00:03:28,600 --> 00:03:31,400
manager, I was a SharePoint manager at one point as well.

46
00:03:31,400 --> 00:03:36,480
And I just expanded what I was doing with the system, I worked with other Microsoft partners

47
00:03:36,480 --> 00:03:42,480
as the client and eventually I got to the point where I knew enough that I felt I could actually

48
00:03:42,480 --> 00:03:43,480
come in as a consultant.

49
00:03:43,480 --> 00:03:44,480
And that's what I did.

50
00:03:44,480 --> 00:03:48,480
I joined the Microsoft partner in the UK, became a consultant and then eventually I was a

51
00:03:48,480 --> 00:03:51,360
principal consultant and a solution architect.

52
00:03:51,360 --> 00:03:56,320
And as time went on, so this was in over about 15 plus years, as you said, in your intro,

53
00:03:56,320 --> 00:04:01,360
I eventually then decided to move on to be a delivery lead, which is what I am now for

54
00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:02,880
telephone protect.

55
00:04:02,880 --> 00:04:09,400
So yeah, it was very much just a gradual process over many, many years, but it all started

56
00:04:09,400 --> 00:04:14,400
with just getting that exposure to the software and really liking the way it worked and the

57
00:04:14,400 --> 00:04:17,440
functionality it had and how you could use it.

58
00:04:17,440 --> 00:04:19,400
Okay, awesome.

59
00:04:19,400 --> 00:04:25,560
You know, the professional service teams was leadership always an ambition or did that evolve

60
00:04:25,560 --> 00:04:30,000
naturally as your career processed?

61
00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:34,960
It wasn't something I was aiming for necessarily.

62
00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:38,840
I always saw myself as part of a delivery team on projects.

63
00:04:38,840 --> 00:04:44,080
I didn't ever see myself moving a level above that and overseeing it rather than doing the

64
00:04:44,080 --> 00:04:52,320
actual build, but I got to a point where I had the opportunity internally due to the Microsoft

65
00:04:52,320 --> 00:04:55,840
partner was working for being acquired by another bigger partner.

66
00:04:55,840 --> 00:05:00,600
I had the opportunity to go for a head of delivery role and I thought that it would be silly of

67
00:05:00,600 --> 00:05:02,800
me not to go for it.

68
00:05:02,800 --> 00:05:10,040
I very much owe being in the leadership position now to encouragement though from other people

69
00:05:10,040 --> 00:05:14,840
because when I saw the job description, I felt like maybe I didn't have enough experience

70
00:05:14,840 --> 00:05:18,920
to be a delivery lead, having led delivery teams in projects.

71
00:05:18,920 --> 00:05:24,800
I thought maybe I was missing kind of key people management leadership skills.

72
00:05:24,800 --> 00:05:32,560
I didn't know if I had enough experience in terms of commercial awareness, managing pre-sales,

73
00:05:32,560 --> 00:05:37,400
customer relationships, I wasn't sure if I had that much of the commercial experience around

74
00:05:37,400 --> 00:05:40,280
it to be able to be a head of delivery.

75
00:05:40,280 --> 00:05:47,000
I almost talked to myself out of it and I had someone in the business that I reached out

76
00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:49,880
and said, "I don't think I should actually go and interview for this because I don't

77
00:05:49,880 --> 00:05:52,800
think, you know, this and this and this and this thing, I don't have an experience in

78
00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:56,720
at all and if you're looking for that, then I don't want to waste their time."

79
00:05:56,720 --> 00:05:58,680
She said to me, "Don't even worry about it.

80
00:05:58,680 --> 00:06:00,960
Just talk about the things you do now."

81
00:06:00,960 --> 00:06:05,080
Sure enough, I got the role which I was very excited and relieved by because I wasn't

82
00:06:05,080 --> 00:06:09,200
really sure I was going to get it because of those reasons.

83
00:06:09,200 --> 00:06:13,240
Yeah, any of the end it didn't really matter because I learned those things in my job and

84
00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:18,520
the fact that I have a technical background helps me support the delivery teams a lot better

85
00:06:18,520 --> 00:06:19,520
as well.

86
00:06:19,520 --> 00:06:24,280
And I can also poke my little head into their meetings and go, "What are you building?

87
00:06:24,280 --> 00:06:25,280
What's going on?

88
00:06:25,280 --> 00:06:26,760
How are you making this?"

89
00:06:26,760 --> 00:06:30,760
And we can still have geeky conversations about it which is really nice.

90
00:06:30,760 --> 00:06:31,760
Amazing.

91
00:06:31,760 --> 00:06:35,400
Yeah, great career.

92
00:06:35,400 --> 00:06:41,880
But you are widely recognized for your expertise across Dynamics, 365 Customer Engagement,

93
00:06:41,880 --> 00:06:43,760
ERP and Power Platform.

94
00:06:43,760 --> 00:06:51,120
What was it about Microsoft Business Applications ecosystem that really captured your attention?

95
00:06:51,120 --> 00:06:56,320
So initially it was the fact that it was fairly straightforward and easy to use as an

96
00:06:56,320 --> 00:07:01,920
end user when I was an end user, but also it was very easy to configure in the background

97
00:07:01,920 --> 00:07:08,040
and it was, it's a very logical system and most kind of software is.

98
00:07:08,040 --> 00:07:12,160
So for me it was, I really liked the fact that it was easy and straightforward to use and

99
00:07:12,160 --> 00:07:15,280
you can understand what you were looking at and you could see how things were linked together,

100
00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:18,840
but then also in the background it was very easy to customize things.

101
00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:23,920
Back when I started, we didn't, you know, Power Platform didn't exist, which is unthinkable

102
00:07:23,920 --> 00:07:27,920
now, but back then it was a simpler in a way life.

103
00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:32,200
There was no A&M, there was no pipelines, it was just the case of manual deployments,

104
00:07:32,200 --> 00:07:34,600
you know, and solution packages and things like that.

105
00:07:34,600 --> 00:07:42,120
So it has, the role has changed a lot, but for me I really enjoyed how easy it was

106
00:07:42,120 --> 00:07:46,160
to understand how the solution worked in the background.

107
00:07:46,160 --> 00:07:49,400
And I didn't come from a technical background at the time.

108
00:07:49,400 --> 00:07:53,880
My, my education wasn't really in software development or anything like that at all.

109
00:07:53,880 --> 00:07:58,160
So for me I just really liked the fact that it was, if you followed it through and you

110
00:07:58,160 --> 00:08:03,040
read through the documentation, you were actually able to pick it up fairly quickly and

111
00:08:03,040 --> 00:08:08,040
getting that experience and being able to create things and change things and develop

112
00:08:08,040 --> 00:08:13,080
a system that was used by people and it made the difference to them having a system that

113
00:08:13,080 --> 00:08:16,360
they were able to use and made their work life better.

114
00:08:16,360 --> 00:08:18,240
That was the thing for me that I really liked.

115
00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:24,360
When Power Platform came along and kind of dataverse to begin with, that just changed

116
00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:30,360
it and it made it a lot more useful in terms of having more than one part of the business

117
00:08:30,360 --> 00:08:34,200
using a Microsoft solution or Microsoft tool.

118
00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:38,720
So you started seeing these economies of scale between departments and the integration between

119
00:08:38,720 --> 00:08:43,760
the different types of the stack and then obviously the Power Platform itself came along,

120
00:08:43,760 --> 00:08:49,360
admin centers came along that linked it all together and now you can actually have multiple

121
00:08:49,360 --> 00:08:54,000
first-party apps and multiple solutions, but you can also have things in Azure for governance,

122
00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:56,640
you know, for you defend foundry now.

123
00:08:56,640 --> 00:09:01,080
It's all developing and it's all changing and that was a nice thing for me as well.

124
00:09:01,080 --> 00:09:07,560
It's nice to know something inside out and definitely in the time when I started it was,

125
00:09:07,560 --> 00:09:13,480
you could say, I know CRM, I know what's in the CRM system in terms of functionality and

126
00:09:13,480 --> 00:09:14,960
how it works.

127
00:09:14,960 --> 00:09:20,160
Now it's very, very difficult to say that you know everything in the stack.

128
00:09:20,160 --> 00:09:25,760
It's impossible so you have to pick one area and even then it's developing so, so quickly

129
00:09:25,760 --> 00:09:29,520
now that your knowledge is out of date very, very quickly.

130
00:09:29,520 --> 00:09:34,200
So it's, and this wasn't the case when I first started but it definitely is now.

131
00:09:34,200 --> 00:09:37,400
So for me, the fact that it's changing, it's developing, new features are coming out all

132
00:09:37,400 --> 00:09:39,880
the time, things are changing all the time.

133
00:09:39,880 --> 00:09:47,280
It's great, don't get me wrong, it's also very difficult to, to, to, to be like, I just

134
00:09:47,280 --> 00:09:51,400
went through this and I thought I knew everything and I do know and it's, but it's really nice

135
00:09:51,400 --> 00:09:54,200
and this is where the community comes in as well.

136
00:09:54,200 --> 00:09:58,600
Everyone getting together from different points of view, different product stacks and

137
00:09:58,600 --> 00:10:03,560
actually, you know, the best conversations I have had in the community are with other

138
00:10:03,560 --> 00:10:08,000
MVPs or other people in the community that represent different parts of the stack and

139
00:10:08,000 --> 00:10:12,560
discussing the challenges that we may have in, in C and the challenges they may have in

140
00:10:12,560 --> 00:10:17,040
Azure or the challenges they have from a security perspective or from a compliance perspective.

141
00:10:17,040 --> 00:10:21,920
And that's all very interesting and they are part of it for me was more recent.

142
00:10:21,920 --> 00:10:26,480
So when I became head of delivery, I started delivering also ERP projects and that was

143
00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:32,120
something I needed to upskill on because I hadn't spent much time on the ERP space and that

144
00:10:32,120 --> 00:10:36,720
was a very interesting learning curve for me as well because the ERP projects, although

145
00:10:36,720 --> 00:10:41,800
some parts of the stack are shared, both as project delivery is different to see projects

146
00:10:41,800 --> 00:10:48,040
but also the way they, they work and the functionality within D3.5, F and O, F and C and

147
00:10:48,040 --> 00:10:52,400
however you want to, whatever you want to call it, it's all really different and it's

148
00:10:52,400 --> 00:10:55,480
a different part of the business obviously that uses them that has different challenges

149
00:10:55,480 --> 00:10:58,000
altogether to the operational teams.

150
00:10:58,000 --> 00:10:59,800
So all of that was very interesting for me as well.

151
00:10:59,800 --> 00:11:08,520
It really has become a huge stack now and it's very, very difficult to know, know it all.

152
00:11:08,520 --> 00:11:14,760
I think it's more accurate to say, I know people that know parts of the stack.

153
00:11:14,760 --> 00:11:19,200
So if I have a question about an area I don't know, I will know a person that knows about

154
00:11:19,200 --> 00:11:21,960
it and I can probably go and ask a question and I think that's the great thing about the

155
00:11:21,960 --> 00:11:22,960
community.

156
00:11:22,960 --> 00:11:26,880
Yeah, that's a little bit deep dive in and projects.

157
00:11:26,880 --> 00:11:31,360
You worked on a lot of projects ranging from relative straight forward implementations

158
00:11:31,360 --> 00:11:38,960
to I think in Telephonicar, it's a thing that's hugely complex enterprise transformation.

159
00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:44,200
What separates successful projects from unsuccessful ones?

160
00:11:44,200 --> 00:11:51,480
Yeah, there is definitely quite a few things and it depends sometimes on the project.

161
00:11:51,480 --> 00:11:56,120
There will be different challenges I think is sometimes for your P projects versus C projects

162
00:11:56,120 --> 00:11:59,920
for example or more recently a GNI projects.

163
00:11:59,920 --> 00:12:06,040
I think it's fair to say that there is some kind of key things that happen between successful

164
00:12:06,040 --> 00:12:12,560
and unsuccessful projects and a lot of the time a project won't fail because of the technology

165
00:12:12,560 --> 00:12:15,680
it will fail because of the people.

166
00:12:15,680 --> 00:12:20,880
You could have the most brilliantly technologically speaking built system.

167
00:12:20,880 --> 00:12:26,880
And if the people that are supposed to use it don't then that investment in the technology

168
00:12:26,880 --> 00:12:28,760
will have come to nothing.

169
00:12:28,760 --> 00:12:35,440
And a lot of the time we may think of the end position of a project being the goal live

170
00:12:35,440 --> 00:12:40,920
but really from an organization's point putting a system live is only the beginning for them

171
00:12:40,920 --> 00:12:46,640
because the value has to come after that point and the benefits has to come after that

172
00:12:46,640 --> 00:12:47,640
point.

173
00:12:47,640 --> 00:12:51,080
Getting to the goal lives great but that's only the beginning.

174
00:12:51,080 --> 00:12:56,280
I think a lot of organizations sometimes underestimate the amount of time that is needed

175
00:12:56,280 --> 00:13:03,640
by their SMEs to work on a project to make it successful from a technical perspective.

176
00:13:03,640 --> 00:13:07,040
So people will have their day jobs in that organization.

177
00:13:07,040 --> 00:13:10,840
They will then be asked to fulfill a project role like there might be a product owner or

178
00:13:10,840 --> 00:13:15,480
there might be testing or they may need to do UAT or there might be a super user.

179
00:13:15,480 --> 00:13:20,200
And a lot of effort has to go into both the discovery sessions so telling the consultants

180
00:13:20,200 --> 00:13:24,720
what they need, how they needed getting the user stories written, the acceptance criteria,

181
00:13:24,720 --> 00:13:28,360
the test scripts that they need to create data migration checks.

182
00:13:28,360 --> 00:13:32,720
There is a lot of effort that is needed from the organization before they can go live.

183
00:13:32,720 --> 00:13:38,480
And I've seen situations where projects have not been successful because that time couldn't

184
00:13:38,480 --> 00:13:43,480
be given or those people had to rush through things.

185
00:13:43,480 --> 00:13:47,720
And then you could end up with a system where it would go live but because processes had

186
00:13:47,720 --> 00:13:51,800
not been tested then to end, you had issues that go live.

187
00:13:51,800 --> 00:13:56,400
It could be the case that there wasn't much support in terms of super users or training

188
00:13:56,400 --> 00:13:57,800
internally by the organization.

189
00:13:57,800 --> 00:14:03,840
So people had a difficult experience to begin with with the software learning how to use

190
00:14:03,840 --> 00:14:09,320
it and getting frustrated because of that or missing kind of key information or the system

191
00:14:09,320 --> 00:14:15,480
itself in some cases not being as simple as it could be having kind of all complicated

192
00:14:15,480 --> 00:14:20,600
processes that need to over complicated systems that affect the adoption.

193
00:14:20,600 --> 00:14:25,960
It really depends on how you define a successful project to be honest because different parts

194
00:14:25,960 --> 00:14:29,520
of the project teams will define it differently.

195
00:14:29,520 --> 00:14:33,800
From a much of partners perspective you may consider a project successful if it's gone live,

196
00:14:33,800 --> 00:14:36,120
the customers happy and hypergames finished.

197
00:14:36,120 --> 00:14:40,640
But from a client's perspective the project will only be considered successful if it meets

198
00:14:40,640 --> 00:14:45,040
the KPIs and the metrics that they want to see out of it perhaps it could be how long the

199
00:14:45,040 --> 00:14:50,440
sales process might take for salespeople to complete before the system was put in place

200
00:14:50,440 --> 00:14:56,680
or in terms of you know, if you're doing edge edge edge edge AI for example, how much more

201
00:14:56,680 --> 00:15:02,120
productive is the team, what benefits are they getting from using edge edge AI, have they

202
00:15:02,120 --> 00:15:06,920
defined that before they started, a lot of the time with a genetic AI some people will start

203
00:15:06,920 --> 00:15:08,800
with the solution not the problem.

204
00:15:08,800 --> 00:15:14,440
So you know AI is the answer, what is the question and a lot of the time these kind of pilots

205
00:15:14,440 --> 00:15:20,120
AI pilots can be unsuccessful because the AI is being introduced but there is no problem

206
00:15:20,120 --> 00:15:21,120
being solved.

207
00:15:21,120 --> 00:15:25,640
It's more of an experiment than an actual project with aims and objectives.

208
00:15:25,640 --> 00:15:31,440
So it is really a case of having a look at what you are trying to achieve by doing this

209
00:15:31,440 --> 00:15:36,400
project whether it's the ERP power platform, a genetic AI, it doesn't really matter and

210
00:15:36,400 --> 00:15:43,560
really identifying exactly what you are what you are aiming for and who it is for is it

211
00:15:43,560 --> 00:15:50,880
the project for a team, is it the whole organization, is it the case of depending on other systems,

212
00:15:50,880 --> 00:15:55,560
how complicated is it going to be, who is going to own it once it's live as well, sometimes

213
00:15:55,560 --> 00:16:03,720
I see projects fail because of lack of ownership internally and in some cases as a set of engineering

214
00:16:03,720 --> 00:16:10,040
and that is a, that can be a real problem and sometimes the cost, the ongoing cost of

215
00:16:10,040 --> 00:16:15,800
having that solution live particularly now with a genetic AI solutions isn't really considered

216
00:16:15,800 --> 00:16:21,320
so you can get a bit of regret as an organization for putting something in place that then is

217
00:16:21,320 --> 00:16:24,200
very costly as time goes on.

218
00:16:24,200 --> 00:16:28,160
And yeah, particularly now with the genetic solutions and tokens and the cost of that it can

219
00:16:28,160 --> 00:16:32,720
be a bit unpredictable so and of course the licenses are changing all the time as we know

220
00:16:32,720 --> 00:16:37,840
in the structure of them and what isn't included in the license and all of that stuff so it's

221
00:16:37,840 --> 00:16:44,520
yeah it really depends on how you define success and from whose point of view you look at

222
00:16:44,520 --> 00:16:50,080
it but I would say these are the things, the areas I should say that will make or break

223
00:16:50,080 --> 00:16:54,760
the project from my experience across them.

224
00:16:54,760 --> 00:16:58,800
Awesome, yeah that's really good.

225
00:16:58,800 --> 00:17:08,520
I think, I have seen you are a course of the Power Delivery Podcast which often focus on

226
00:17:08,520 --> 00:17:11,000
implementation best in practice.

227
00:17:11,000 --> 00:17:18,320
What are some of the recurrent themes you see when projects begin to struggle?

228
00:17:18,320 --> 00:17:27,640
I think projects begin to struggle sometimes when there is a lack of time for resumes they

229
00:17:27,640 --> 00:17:33,520
there can be kind of a slow, slow progress or progress that has been quick before kind

230
00:17:33,520 --> 00:17:38,760
of slows down a bit and there isn't that much that can be progressed and signed off and

231
00:17:38,760 --> 00:17:41,640
your goal lives lips basically.

232
00:17:41,640 --> 00:17:46,280
That is one way that you can have a problem in a project.

233
00:17:46,280 --> 00:17:49,560
Another one could be scope control, scope creep.

234
00:17:49,560 --> 00:17:53,880
If you're not controlling the requests from the business sometimes you can start wanting

235
00:17:53,880 --> 00:17:59,400
to have an MVP and then a lot of different organizations and sorry, a lot of different departments

236
00:17:59,400 --> 00:18:04,320
in an organization can want different things and they might come with a you know bucket list

237
00:18:04,320 --> 00:18:09,200
of things that they would like for the system to do and you try to create a lot of functionality

238
00:18:09,200 --> 00:18:16,240
that then makes the project run very long and also it takes takes a lot more time to

239
00:18:16,240 --> 00:18:18,440
to put all that together and tested and so on.

240
00:18:18,440 --> 00:18:23,760
It creates additional complexity when in some cases don't give me wrong complexity sometimes

241
00:18:23,760 --> 00:18:31,240
is needed if you go complex processes but what I see a lot is that there is a lot of requirements

242
00:18:31,240 --> 00:18:36,640
that are marked as MVP must have on day one when actually the organization will be better

243
00:18:36,640 --> 00:18:42,600
off to have those on the face too and actually have a system that is very simple to begin

244
00:18:42,600 --> 00:18:47,360
with so to speak that can get embedded people can start using it they can give that

245
00:18:47,360 --> 00:18:52,800
me show feedback and then build on it and keep working and iterating through development

246
00:18:52,800 --> 00:18:58,200
cycles and giving additional functionality as they go on because the longer you leave it

247
00:18:58,200 --> 00:19:04,400
to give a solution to the end users that will be using it the more likely it is that

248
00:19:04,400 --> 00:19:08,960
it won't meet the requirements of those users and if you don't give them visibility early

249
00:19:08,960 --> 00:19:12,920
on as you're building that solution as well so that they can give you their feedback and

250
00:19:12,920 --> 00:19:15,440
they can tell you what isn't going to work for them.

251
00:19:15,440 --> 00:19:20,920
I think that's where you can get into trouble as well there's nothing worse I think than

252
00:19:20,920 --> 00:19:25,400
having a development team going into a dark room for weeks or months and then coming out

253
00:19:25,400 --> 00:19:30,440
with something that hasn't had any of the end users give or SMEs give feedback to it

254
00:19:30,440 --> 00:19:34,800
at all because sometimes people will tell you what they want and actually what they want

255
00:19:34,800 --> 00:19:39,320
is something completely different and you want to know that and they want to know that until

256
00:19:39,320 --> 00:19:43,040
they see and play with something in front of them and go actually you know what I know I

257
00:19:43,040 --> 00:19:47,120
told you I wanted this but actually what would really be good is that and if you don't

258
00:19:47,120 --> 00:19:52,760
get that feedback you miss out on that information but also you miss out on their engagement with

259
00:19:52,760 --> 00:19:57,920
the project and them feeling like this is a real thing that is that they have an invested

260
00:19:57,920 --> 00:20:02,400
interest in that they have helped happen if you leave them at arms length until the

261
00:20:02,400 --> 00:20:08,640
goal I for the end user training they won't feel like they've been part of creating the

262
00:20:08,640 --> 00:20:14,000
system and therefore they will be less likely to to feel invested in using it and adopting

263
00:20:14,000 --> 00:20:20,760
it and making it a success and change management is a is a great thing that makes or break

264
00:20:20,760 --> 00:20:26,800
makes a project or breaks a project if it's not thought about from the very beginning

265
00:20:26,800 --> 00:20:30,840
you have to think about the goal live and the adoption of the system from the moment

266
00:20:30,840 --> 00:20:35,320
you start a project if not before and figure out how are you going to engage the people

267
00:20:35,320 --> 00:20:39,320
that are going to drive the project forward and who are those people that are going to

268
00:20:39,320 --> 00:20:43,680
be owning that system and driving its adoption because that's where your benefit is going

269
00:20:43,680 --> 00:20:48,880
to come from not from having a successful project implementation and I think a lot of

270
00:20:48,880 --> 00:20:55,160
the time there isn't much consideration given to that or people are in roles that are

271
00:20:55,160 --> 00:21:03,240
very they don't have the bandwidth in their role to to put the right time in an effort to

272
00:21:03,240 --> 00:21:06,080
to make these things happen because it does take a lot of time and it does take a lot of

273
00:21:06,080 --> 00:21:12,640
effort the organizations that have done that well tend to in some cases backfill people

274
00:21:12,640 --> 00:21:18,480
to allow them to have that space to drive this forward until the project is finished

275
00:21:18,480 --> 00:21:23,320
and the adoption has happened and a lot of time has passed since the goal live that

276
00:21:23,320 --> 00:21:27,200
it has been embedded in and implemented and that kind of high level of support needed at

277
00:21:27,200 --> 00:21:31,560
the beginning after goal live isn't there anymore but not every organization can afford

278
00:21:31,560 --> 00:21:38,480
to do this honestly so it's always a case of a juggling act I think and yeah it's not

279
00:21:38,480 --> 00:21:43,020
always easy to do many projects fail and there's you know we could have a new episode just

280
00:21:43,020 --> 00:21:46,880
talking about why projects fail I think and we definitely doing our broadcast as well

281
00:21:46,880 --> 00:21:51,360
on the part delivery broadcast we talk a lot about changes that are happening in the

282
00:21:51,360 --> 00:21:56,440
stack what what they mean and what you need to look out for and and the things that you need

283
00:21:56,440 --> 00:22:02,400
to consider because we try to help people avoid those pitfalls of things that can go wrong

284
00:22:02,400 --> 00:22:06,480
if people don't think about it and you know particularly with a gender AI you've got

285
00:22:06,480 --> 00:22:11,480
different ways that you could achieve the same result so it's a case of actually thinking

286
00:22:11,480 --> 00:22:16,240
about what the best of root to solve your problem is as well so as time goes on I think

287
00:22:16,240 --> 00:22:23,200
it gets more complicated this is awesome and there was one one thing I think a lot of companies

288
00:22:23,200 --> 00:22:30,320
use change management as best work and and you have both perspective so you come from

289
00:22:30,320 --> 00:22:36,440
the technic at the now you're leading the professional service team how has your definition

290
00:22:36,440 --> 00:22:45,400
of change management change over this from this post perspective yeah I think I've I've

291
00:22:45,400 --> 00:22:51,160
become much more aware of the conversations being had that executive and senior level around

292
00:22:51,160 --> 00:22:56,160
the project so I've before when when I was not head of delivery and I wasn't part of those

293
00:22:56,160 --> 00:23:01,760
conversations taking place because traditionally delivery teams will focus on the day to day as

294
00:23:01,760 --> 00:23:05,080
you would expect delivery of the project but they wouldn't look at the strategic direction

295
00:23:05,080 --> 00:23:09,200
of that project or have conversations with the executives of the of the organization the

296
00:23:09,200 --> 00:23:14,560
project is being done done with necessarily now that I get to see that side of it I'm much

297
00:23:14,560 --> 00:23:20,320
more aware of the challenges that the organizations have when looking to use Microsoft technology

298
00:23:20,320 --> 00:23:26,440
that I didn't before before I had a different level of understanding in terms of the day to

299
00:23:26,440 --> 00:23:31,840
day the system managers the the obviously the end users themselves but I didn't really

300
00:23:31,840 --> 00:23:37,840
know from a a KPI's a return on investment perspective that didn't necessarily come

301
00:23:37,840 --> 00:23:42,880
into those conversations it was more focused around how can we create a system that meets

302
00:23:42,880 --> 00:23:48,560
the requirements fully and meets the acceptance criteria and works well and efficiently and

303
00:23:48,560 --> 00:23:53,360
the the IT team or the business teams that were going to support it have they got enough

304
00:23:53,360 --> 00:23:57,240
knowledge and experience and understand the system well enough have we done the right

305
00:23:57,240 --> 00:24:03,680
handover for them to be self reliant after we're gone that was more my focus when I was part

306
00:24:03,680 --> 00:24:08,160
of a delivery team and when I was managing the consultants that I was working with to build

307
00:24:08,160 --> 00:24:13,280
those solutions that was where we we focused and that's where we probably should have focused

308
00:24:13,280 --> 00:24:19,200
as well. But being ahead of delivery now I have those conversations around we're investing

309
00:24:19,200 --> 00:24:23,880
this much in putting this system in what benefits are we going to get how are we going

310
00:24:23,880 --> 00:24:27,960
to make sure that we have the right solution in place what do we do after it's been put

311
00:24:27,960 --> 00:24:32,840
in place how do we manage upgrades how do we manage new functionality what can we do

312
00:24:32,840 --> 00:24:37,200
in terms of agent KIOs they coming into it now how are we going to use AI in our

313
00:24:37,200 --> 00:24:42,160
existing systems how do we need to change our processes how do we need to change the

314
00:24:42,160 --> 00:24:47,840
organization what we do and who does what how do we bring agents into our workflows who

315
00:24:47,840 --> 00:24:53,200
owns them what does that mean so there's a lot broader conversations that I'm part of now

316
00:24:53,200 --> 00:24:59,520
that I wasn't at before and it's a lot more of a strategic view and long term view on

317
00:24:59,520 --> 00:25:04,320
the technology than a shorter term view than I had before and and that's what makes it

318
00:25:04,320 --> 00:25:11,120
interesting for me as well like and I know technically what is available and it's about then having

319
00:25:11,120 --> 00:25:16,640
conversations about what that means for the humans using that technology and what that means for

320
00:25:16,640 --> 00:25:21,760
organizations long term implementing that technology so I look at it from a different perspective now

321
00:25:21,760 --> 00:25:27,280
and it's really it's it's a great I feel privileged to be in that position to be able to have those

322
00:25:27,280 --> 00:25:33,120
conversations with senior level executives and understand their challenges and how we can help

323
00:25:33,120 --> 00:25:38,880
in what we do so I think it gives you a lot of a better perspective of the impact the projects have

324
00:25:38,880 --> 00:25:46,880
more outside of the immediate people using it it allows you to see the organizational impact as

325
00:25:46,880 --> 00:25:56,240
well which is great awesome I think a little about agent KIO a lot of people especially on linked

326
00:25:56,240 --> 00:26:05,360
in every time I think nearly I don't know a lot of posts are about a genetic AI but for listener who

327
00:26:05,360 --> 00:26:12,640
hear the term yeah we hear the term frequently but aren't actually sure what it means how would you

328
00:26:12,640 --> 00:26:21,680
explain a genetic AI well that's that is a very good question so in terms of the the Microsoft stack

329
00:26:21,680 --> 00:26:28,880
itself there's a number of different AI solutions it's really when it comes to gender KIO it's not

330
00:26:28,880 --> 00:26:34,720
really one thing it's a group of AI systems that have agency which is why we call them agentic it means

331
00:26:34,720 --> 00:26:40,320
that they can autonomously make decisions take actions to achieve a goal and they're not simply

332
00:26:40,320 --> 00:26:48,560
responding to a prompt they are actually autonomously doing something they have that agency it's a it's

333
00:26:48,560 --> 00:26:54,320
really a case of having if you think if we think about the things that we've discussed so far

334
00:26:54,320 --> 00:26:59,760
part platform dynamism is six five first parts the app c systems the Rp systems they themselves are

335
00:26:59,760 --> 00:27:08,240
not agentic because the human has to make decisions so they are they are not acting autonomously

336
00:27:08,240 --> 00:27:14,000
effectively where you have a genetic AI is where you've got an agent or a solution that is acting

337
00:27:14,000 --> 00:27:19,120
autonomously to achieve an outcome and it's not just producing outputs and historically with

338
00:27:19,120 --> 00:27:25,360
produced with with use systems as humans to produce outputs so it's it's a case of moving

339
00:27:25,360 --> 00:27:32,720
beyond just providing answers to executing tasks and executing workflows and working independently

340
00:27:32,720 --> 00:27:42,160
with minimal human input so it really from a a definition perspective at the high level that's

341
00:27:42,160 --> 00:27:46,480
what i would say there's also different types of agentic AI so agentic AI itself is a bit of a

342
00:27:46,480 --> 00:27:53,920
category so it is all based on you know planning and executing actions but then you have generative

343
00:27:53,920 --> 00:28:00,960
AI you've got co-pilot style assistance they're also considered AI but the agentic part of it is

344
00:28:00,960 --> 00:28:06,320
particularly that automation which we're seeing a lot of organizations looking to to use right now

345
00:28:07,680 --> 00:28:14,800
what's exciting especially when we think about Microsoft yeah are they having up with agents

346
00:28:14,800 --> 00:28:23,520
i think it's the way our role is changing when it comes to interacting with technology i think

347
00:28:23,520 --> 00:28:31,280
this is the main thing for me because traditionally it's a case of getting an answer from a system

348
00:28:31,280 --> 00:28:36,160
whereas now it's a it's a case of having agents say i will solve the problem for you

349
00:28:36,880 --> 00:28:45,520
and it's not deterministic anymore so we can't really test agentic solutions the way we would test

350
00:28:45,520 --> 00:28:52,240
first-party apps because we can't really predict what they're going to say or how they're going to

351
00:28:52,240 --> 00:28:59,280
say it now this is changing a bit with creating for example agent evaluations or e-bunnels and things

352
00:28:59,280 --> 00:29:06,400
like that where we're making it a lot more stringent as to trying to create some guidelines as to

353
00:29:06,400 --> 00:29:13,440
how they will behave but it's very much involving technology at the moment and for me i think it's a

354
00:29:13,440 --> 00:29:24,240
it's a case of knowing that we are we are no longer central to the use of technology it used to be

355
00:29:24,240 --> 00:29:30,880
that the human being was central in the way technology was used but now we are in the periphery we

356
00:29:30,880 --> 00:29:37,520
are not in the center anymore we are brought into a system or we will be once we get fully autonomous

357
00:29:37,520 --> 00:29:44,400
agentic solutions out there we will be coming in by exception and i i truly believe that we will

358
00:29:44,400 --> 00:29:49,200
get to the point and in some cases some organizations are already at that point those that are very very

359
00:29:49,200 --> 00:29:56,880
much as marxas says in the frontier so i think i think it's a it's a very much a learning curve but at

360
00:29:56,880 --> 00:30:02,320
the same time we need to pace ourselves and of course you know you've got things like quantum AI

361
00:30:02,320 --> 00:30:07,040
that's gonna come along and change things for us again so this is only the beginning of a very

362
00:30:07,040 --> 00:30:16,240
long road yeah i think a lot of organizations are rushing to deploy i actually what questions show the

363
00:30:16,240 --> 00:30:25,440
leaders be asking for the start why are we doing this and what i and what i mean by that is

364
00:30:25,440 --> 00:30:32,240
we shouldn't we shouldn't just be jumping on the bandwagon of the latest technology and

365
00:30:32,240 --> 00:30:37,120
doing it purely because we feel like we there's a competitive advantage out there that we are going

366
00:30:37,120 --> 00:30:43,680
to lose if if we don't jump on although that is technically speaking true because if our competitors

367
00:30:43,680 --> 00:30:49,680
are looking to use the AI to become more efficient or quicker in responding or providing a better

368
00:30:49,680 --> 00:30:53,120
customer experience however you want to you want to define your competitive advantage in your

369
00:30:53,120 --> 00:30:59,600
in your industry or in your organization i think it's important to know that organizations have

370
00:30:59,600 --> 00:31:06,560
existed for many many many decades years you know since commerce began and your business strategy

371
00:31:06,560 --> 00:31:11,760
can't be an AI strategy and what i mean by that is the reason your organization exists and what

372
00:31:11,760 --> 00:31:18,240
you're trying to do in the world should be the same before and after AI because at the end of the day

373
00:31:18,240 --> 00:31:23,680
AI is just the latest technological tool we can use to achieve that strategy it's not a strategy in

374
00:31:23,680 --> 00:31:29,760
itself so i always get a little bit uneasy when organizations say you know our strategies to use a

375
00:31:29,760 --> 00:31:38,320
AI to become the best in next one said and thinking well okay great but what is what do you exist as

376
00:31:38,320 --> 00:31:43,440
an organization how is AI going to help you continue to be the best in what you can do so you

377
00:31:43,440 --> 00:31:48,960
definitely see a difference between new companies and older more established companies in terms of

378
00:31:48,960 --> 00:31:55,680
how they approach the technology and as i said it is going to change it's it's a case of identifying

379
00:31:55,680 --> 00:32:05,600
also what that means for us as organizations we are changing what it means to be a in certain role

380
00:32:05,600 --> 00:32:11,760
job role here whatever our job role is right now so at the moment i might for example if i take

381
00:32:11,760 --> 00:32:16,720
myself as an example as a head of delivery i might be doing my job and i have a job description

382
00:32:16,720 --> 00:32:23,600
that doesn't include being the manager of agents but i am sure at some point our job descriptions will

383
00:32:23,600 --> 00:32:30,320
start to change to to say that the head of delivery manages x, y and z and and these responsible for

384
00:32:30,320 --> 00:32:34,560
x, y and z in the organization and those are also responsible as the owner of the

385
00:32:35,840 --> 00:32:41,760
you know time should approve all this agent and the and the resource scheduling agent and

386
00:32:41,760 --> 00:32:48,480
that we will actually have job roles that are a combination of a human being and agents the job

387
00:32:48,480 --> 00:32:57,360
description will involve both and i and i think that that changes what we do at work what it means to

388
00:32:57,360 --> 00:33:05,360
be any any job type any job description will change i think our processes will change

389
00:33:05,360 --> 00:33:13,200
and we will become this hybrid way of living and working and then potentially more

390
00:33:13,200 --> 00:33:21,040
forgetting to something different so yeah it's for me it's very interesting to see how we make

391
00:33:21,040 --> 00:33:26,080
that transition and how far do we go with trusting because at the end of the day i think it really

392
00:33:26,080 --> 00:33:32,720
does come down to trust how far do we trust these the the agency that we will give these these tools

393
00:33:33,440 --> 00:33:40,080
and also unfortunately where my things go wrong because we love to think of these things as things

394
00:33:40,080 --> 00:33:48,000
that will only be used for good but there is absolutely people out there groups whatever you

395
00:33:48,000 --> 00:33:54,320
want to call them that we'll be looking to use these not for good but as a weapon and it's a case of

396
00:33:54,320 --> 00:34:02,400
being very vigilant to that and and finding ways to use the tools that we've got in a responsible

397
00:34:03,120 --> 00:34:08,480
secure way and i think that's where the challenge is going to be even more so as time goes on and we

398
00:34:08,480 --> 00:34:16,240
start providing this agency to very critical critical systems and even you know having a purchasing

399
00:34:16,240 --> 00:34:21,680
agent that that buys things for us you know that could go very wrong so i think it's going to be very

400
00:34:21,680 --> 00:34:28,560
interesting to see how we how we as both create the infrastructure but also create the levels of

401
00:34:28,560 --> 00:34:35,120
security needed to be able to use these things without risk awesome i i like a little bit speak

402
00:34:35,120 --> 00:34:41,280
about the trust topic and i think one error where you become particularly well known is AI

403
00:34:41,280 --> 00:34:49,040
governance and compliance and yeah many organizations are enthusiastic about AI but nervous about

404
00:34:49,040 --> 00:34:56,400
regulatory landscape how would you describe the current state of AI legislation globally

405
00:34:58,080 --> 00:35:07,200
chaos so we've got there is a there is a lot of a lot of focus at the moment on first of all creating

406
00:35:07,200 --> 00:35:14,560
guardrails for AI use and that is because initially when AI solutions started being made available

407
00:35:14,560 --> 00:35:19,440
there was a question of do we need to regulate AI or not we've very much moved past that now

408
00:35:19,440 --> 00:35:24,720
it's really a question of how far do we need to regulate it without stifling innovation

409
00:35:25,760 --> 00:35:32,240
and allowing the the benefits to be realized without actually making it so controlled that we're not

410
00:35:32,240 --> 00:35:37,280
actually allowing the benefits to to to be seen so a lot of different countries will have different

411
00:35:37,280 --> 00:35:42,720
approaches to this there's there's over seven three countries in the world that have some level

412
00:35:42,720 --> 00:35:51,520
of legislation or regulations in place or guidance but it really varies and in the EU we have we're

413
00:35:51,520 --> 00:36:00,960
very much in a better situation of having the UAE act very much a legal law that that governs

414
00:36:00,960 --> 00:36:07,520
how AI is is to be developed and used within the EU but it only applies within the EU and it is

415
00:36:07,520 --> 00:36:13,120
a very much a good good basis on which I think other legislation will be brought out but if if you

416
00:36:13,120 --> 00:36:18,960
look at the US for example there is no federal law there's over a thousand state bills every state

417
00:36:18,960 --> 00:36:26,160
does its own thing there is lots of conflicts and there is that question around how do we actually get

418
00:36:26,160 --> 00:36:33,360
to get get to a point where this is a little bit more straightforward in terms of at federal level

419
00:36:33,360 --> 00:36:40,480
so it's it's a lot more difficult when you look at it from a US perspective and then you've got

420
00:36:40,480 --> 00:36:46,560
things in between so in the UK for example we do not have a law but we do have sector-specific

421
00:36:46,560 --> 00:36:52,480
regulations so it really depends on which sector you're in and what regulations you've got but then

422
00:36:52,480 --> 00:36:58,800
if you're dealing with any part of the EU or your users are in you located then the EUAA act applies

423
00:36:58,800 --> 00:37:03,600
anyway because it's extraterritorial so there's all sorts of things that need to be considered

424
00:37:03,600 --> 00:37:11,120
there is really differences at the moment across the board but I think as time goes on more and more

425
00:37:11,120 --> 00:37:17,440
legislation will be introduced and more and more regulations will be introduced the good news is that

426
00:37:17,440 --> 00:37:24,320
there are some standards that are being globally recognized things like the the NIST AI

427
00:37:24,320 --> 00:37:28,880
risk management framework that came from the US very much considered a global standard for

428
00:37:28,880 --> 00:37:33,920
for doing AI risk management well there's ISO standards on AI management systems that are

429
00:37:33,920 --> 00:37:41,200
certifiable as well and and also on risk management so there's there's a lot of guidance there on how to

430
00:37:41,200 --> 00:37:46,480
how to implement regulations and legislation well and I think we're going to see a lot more of that

431
00:37:46,480 --> 00:37:56,320
as time goes on yeah I think a little bit of a hot topic is the EUAA act I think it generates significant

432
00:37:56,320 --> 00:38:04,800
discussions and companies but for organization it hasn't started preparing what shall they be

433
00:38:04,800 --> 00:38:13,920
thinking about today and a second question cannot be yeah it's only regulation or can it also be a

434
00:38:13,920 --> 00:38:23,040
chance for companies I think it's definitely a chance to to consider how they are using AI and

435
00:38:23,040 --> 00:38:30,000
making sure they're using AI in a responsible way and the secure way in terms of what they should be

436
00:38:30,000 --> 00:38:38,400
looking at the EUAA act really creates a a basis on which to do things that should be in place

437
00:38:38,400 --> 00:38:44,240
anyway and what I mean by that is it's things like having an AI inventory knowing what AI has been

438
00:38:44,240 --> 00:38:50,000
used in your organization and for what use cases and that is very much required under the EUAA act

439
00:38:50,000 --> 00:38:57,920
as of August 26th anyway but it's also best practice to have it classifying the risk of which of your AI

440
00:38:57,920 --> 00:39:04,160
solutions is it minimal is it limited is it high risk so are you using for example scoring mechanisms

441
00:39:04,160 --> 00:39:09,840
and things like that which are very much high risk in some cases depending on on what it's for

442
00:39:09,840 --> 00:39:15,760
it might be prohibited so it's it's really understanding what your exposure is from using AI

443
00:39:15,760 --> 00:39:20,640
and making sure that you have governance in place because they might as I said they're unpredictable

444
00:39:20,640 --> 00:39:26,640
so they might go wrong do you have the processes in place to monitor that is they're logging do you

445
00:39:26,640 --> 00:39:31,680
have that human oversight in cases where there's privacy impact assessments or data protection

446
00:39:31,680 --> 00:39:36,960
impact assessments that need to happen are those in place do you have data loss prevention to ensure

447
00:39:36,960 --> 00:39:43,360
your data isn't being used in in a way that is non-compliant how are you doing your risk testing

448
00:39:43,360 --> 00:39:47,600
do you align with international standards so all of these things are our best practices and you

449
00:39:47,600 --> 00:39:54,000
should have them and then there is the AI literacy part of it as well we all have under the

450
00:39:54,000 --> 00:40:01,200
EUAA act there is an obligation to to provide AI training but I think generally there is an

451
00:40:01,200 --> 00:40:07,200
element of all of us needing to have the right level of literacy for the the extent to which we

452
00:40:07,200 --> 00:40:12,800
use AI so if you are obviously a developer creating AI you should have a high level of AI literacy

453
00:40:12,800 --> 00:40:17,840
particularly when it comes to developing AI in a responsible way for example if you're just an

454
00:40:17,840 --> 00:40:22,880
end user of it you need to understand its limitations where ways it can go wrong bias the fact that

455
00:40:22,880 --> 00:40:26,400
it won't give you the right answer you'll just give you the most probable answer these are things

456
00:40:26,400 --> 00:40:32,400
that people need to understand to evaluate what AI is giving them and also having the monitoring

457
00:40:32,400 --> 00:40:38,400
and the life cycle oversight as well having that auditability being able to show that you are

458
00:40:38,400 --> 00:40:46,960
compliant in the first place and that you have control over how the AI is being used and

459
00:40:46,960 --> 00:40:53,680
that you are governing how it's behaving but also you are controlling how the data that it uses is

460
00:40:53,680 --> 00:41:00,560
being used and securing where it runs and how it runs all of those things need to be in place to

461
00:41:00,560 --> 00:41:06,160
make sure that you are not exposed as an organization and that you're not exposing the users of AI

462
00:41:06,160 --> 00:41:11,680
to unintended consequences all of that is within the UAE Act but even if it was and I think it's

463
00:41:11,680 --> 00:41:18,640
things that should be in place as a as a as a minimum I would say and I think Microsoft had a lot

464
00:41:18,640 --> 00:41:24,560
of solutions Microsoft peer view Microsoft Defender and as I have for you has also tools for responsible AI

465
00:41:24,560 --> 00:41:35,920
adoption but we have these tools side and we have the people side how good can can we use this

466
00:41:35,920 --> 00:41:47,680
these tools to be safe be responsible and how important are or how many persons left

467
00:41:48,720 --> 00:41:56,320
on user training what did you think these both yeah I think the tool thinking companies and people

468
00:41:56,320 --> 00:42:03,440
thinking companies yeah it's I think you have to be a people thinking company noted tool thinking

469
00:42:03,440 --> 00:42:08,960
company because I think if you're only looking to implement tools without consideration for the human

470
00:42:08,960 --> 00:42:14,720
element of it you won't get very far unless you are trying to be truly agentic first which are

471
00:42:14,720 --> 00:42:20,480
don't think many organizations are at that stage yet there is always a balance I think between

472
00:42:20,480 --> 00:42:25,520
the teams looking to create and use the technology and the risk and compliance teams within

473
00:42:25,520 --> 00:42:30,320
organizations because one is focused on innovation and the other one is more on security and

474
00:42:30,320 --> 00:42:35,360
compliance and I think it's about finding the right balance and there will be organizations that are

475
00:42:35,360 --> 00:42:43,040
more or less risk averse and more or less innovative and it's okay either way I think what's

476
00:42:43,040 --> 00:42:48,000
important is to identify the right level of innovation for your organization what you're trying to

477
00:42:48,000 --> 00:42:57,440
achieve in terms of the tools it really for me there's three in the stack that I talk about a lot

478
00:42:57,440 --> 00:43:03,200
from a security perspective if we take that first so where and how AI runs

479
00:43:03,200 --> 00:43:11,520
Microsoft has defended very much driven around or focused on security driven compliance

480
00:43:11,520 --> 00:43:16,640
preventing breaches that could cause regulatory violations so you can use defender for things

481
00:43:16,640 --> 00:43:22,880
like discovering any AI models agents and apps you've got it helps with that AI inventory know your

482
00:43:22,880 --> 00:43:27,920
enemy as I say and then detecting any security risks you know things like malicious models or prompt

483
00:43:27,920 --> 00:43:33,840
injections and scanning your models for any vulnerabilities in malware and preventing the all

484
00:43:33,840 --> 00:43:39,760
important kind of data exploration and abuse as well and allowing you to have management of that

485
00:43:39,760 --> 00:43:46,000
of that security and constant monitoring so defender is great from that perspective as a tool then you

486
00:43:46,000 --> 00:43:51,120
would have purview purview would not really be used by your security teams it would be used more

487
00:43:51,120 --> 00:43:56,160
from your compliance and governance teams because it's all about and your legal teams of course

488
00:43:56,160 --> 00:44:01,440
and it's all about logging AI interactions so the prompts and the responses for auditing and

489
00:44:01,440 --> 00:44:09,120
investigations as needed you can classify sensitive data that is being used or generated by AI as well

490
00:44:09,120 --> 00:44:15,440
so it allows you to control again the what data AI uses which is extremely important and

491
00:44:15,440 --> 00:44:20,400
applies in forces policies as well whether that sensitivity labels for your data data loss prevention

492
00:44:20,400 --> 00:44:27,120
or retention policies as well on NEAI outputs again extremely important and giving you that

493
00:44:27,120 --> 00:44:34,560
visibility as well in terms of how your solutions are complying so there's a solution in in

494
00:44:34,560 --> 00:44:38,880
purview I talk about a lot which is the compliance mamaja where you can give it any regulation and you

495
00:44:38,880 --> 00:44:44,720
will review your solutions and give you a score and you will tell you exactly what your tasks are

496
00:44:44,720 --> 00:44:50,720
and what Microsoft's tasks are as the as the provider of that model or technology and it will

497
00:44:50,720 --> 00:44:55,440
give you a list of tasks that you need to improve on to to increase your compliance score

498
00:44:55,440 --> 00:45:00,720
so it does things like you know all these experts are kind of thinking it supports inspections as

499
00:45:00,720 --> 00:45:06,000
well and the enforcement of them which is what's again happening from August 26th there is

500
00:45:06,800 --> 00:45:13,600
if you're in the UAI Act space you have to be able to show that you are monitoring the compliance

501
00:45:13,600 --> 00:45:19,200
and the data AI uses and purview very much allows you to do that for most organizations I think those

502
00:45:19,200 --> 00:45:23,520
two would be would suffice if they're not creating their own models or customizing them

503
00:45:23,520 --> 00:45:29,280
but if you are creating your own custom models through Copa la Studio if you're using Foundry as well

504
00:45:29,280 --> 00:45:34,640
then Foundry itself governs how AI behaves and that's very important as well because

505
00:45:34,640 --> 00:45:43,040
it's all about governance and having responsible AI operationally really so we're talking about

506
00:45:43,040 --> 00:45:47,680
allowed and disallowed models through your Azure policies so having the model governance but also

507
00:45:47,680 --> 00:45:53,440
guardrails and content controls safety filters you know output constraints that kind of thing

508
00:45:53,440 --> 00:45:58,480
and also the actual documentation of your models your versions the purpose of of them existing in

509
00:45:58,480 --> 00:46:05,920
the first place and policy checks guardrail violations all of those things are done within Foundry there's

510
00:46:05,920 --> 00:46:12,560
a lot more that we need to worry about the moment we start customizing or creating our own agents

511
00:46:12,560 --> 00:46:19,600
or models because we are responsible for what they're doing how they're operating and we really need

512
00:46:19,600 --> 00:46:25,440
to make sure that we we have evaluated the their safety and also documented the datasets and

513
00:46:26,640 --> 00:46:31,120
making sure that we've risk assessed them so there's a lot there's a lot more we need to worry about

514
00:46:31,120 --> 00:46:36,560
if we have customized them but I'm not sure them and your organizations are extensively doing this

515
00:46:36,560 --> 00:46:44,000
yet but I think in the future we will see a lot more of that for sure. How do you handle those

516
00:46:44,000 --> 00:46:52,160
regulation topics without slowing down innovation in your company or from how can we do this?

517
00:46:53,600 --> 00:46:59,120
I think the important thing with legislation is that it doesn't change very often because it is set

518
00:46:59,120 --> 00:47:05,840
by lawmakers so it doesn't tend to change very fast regulations move much faster and the I think

519
00:47:05,840 --> 00:47:11,360
the best way right now if you're using the Microsoft stack is to use PerView and the compliance manager

520
00:47:11,360 --> 00:47:18,240
because they keep the regulations up to date so you can constantly evaluate really your solutions and

521
00:47:18,240 --> 00:47:24,560
see where the the changes are and when you're not compliant. A lot of the time these things are

522
00:47:24,560 --> 00:47:28,960
are going to be communicated well and your compliance and your legal teams will very likely be

523
00:47:28,960 --> 00:47:36,080
paying attention to that to identify what applies. The main thing to remember because all of

524
00:47:36,080 --> 00:47:41,200
this can sound very very complex and people can worry a lot when it comes to legal obligations around

525
00:47:41,200 --> 00:47:48,160
the AI. It really depends on what you're using AI for and whether it is truly autonomous and whether

526
00:47:48,160 --> 00:47:55,760
it is actually making its own decisions or if you're using it in a very minimal limited risk way

527
00:47:55,760 --> 00:48:04,640
because you won't have that much compliance or legal obligations concerns. If you're using AI

528
00:48:04,640 --> 00:48:14,080
in a fairly there I say basic way you won't have much exposure but you do need to do that assessment

529
00:48:14,080 --> 00:48:20,160
as a minimum to identify who's using a young or in your organization what are they using it for

530
00:48:20,160 --> 00:48:26,080
and do you have any exposure there in terms of data in terms of risk in terms of security that is

531
00:48:26,080 --> 00:48:30,960
I think the the the important thing because you you need to you need to know your enemy. The other thing

532
00:48:30,960 --> 00:48:36,720
to be aware of as well is I think what is particularly important that I don't see that many organizations

533
00:48:36,720 --> 00:48:43,440
doing it's important to have a use an acceptable use policy for AI in your organization and what I

534
00:48:43,440 --> 00:48:50,320
mean by that is a lot of people will be using their own business accounts to use your accounts I

535
00:48:50,320 --> 00:48:57,680
mean by that to use AI that you may not know of so rogue AI or shadow AI is very much a thing

536
00:48:57,680 --> 00:49:03,040
and it's really a case of doing that analysis within your systems and your tenants to identify

537
00:49:03,040 --> 00:49:09,760
who is using what that you don't know about I think there is this element at the moment of because

538
00:49:09,760 --> 00:49:13,920
everyone is experimenting which again you don't want to stop people from doing so because this is

539
00:49:13,920 --> 00:49:18,240
new technology and you want to encourage innovation you want to encourage new ways of working but at the

540
00:49:18,240 --> 00:49:23,520
same time you need to be doing that in a secure responsible way it's about getting visibility of

541
00:49:23,520 --> 00:49:29,920
what people are trying to use AI for and can you make that official can you make that controlled

542
00:49:29,920 --> 00:49:35,600
and managed and monitored it's not about stopping it I think it would it would be the wrong thing to

543
00:49:35,600 --> 00:49:41,680
stop it but it is about identifying what isn't isn't allowed based on the own your policies so I

544
00:49:41,680 --> 00:49:47,680
think that's a very important part of it too as well is creating those guidelines so that people

545
00:49:47,680 --> 00:49:54,880
understand what they can and and shouldn't use AI for and having that visibility in the first place

546
00:49:54,880 --> 00:50:01,920
that's great and I have seen on session lives you have on yeah you're delivering a session title

547
00:50:01,920 --> 00:50:08,480
AI legislation what you need to know what's the single most important takeaway you want attendees to

548
00:50:08,480 --> 00:50:18,080
leave with no no your enemy know what they are you've got in your tenants know you know have have an

549
00:50:18,080 --> 00:50:25,120
understanding of what you're using AI for right now and and and what that means a lot of organizations

550
00:50:25,120 --> 00:50:30,000
I think are experimenting their people are experimenting but not that not many organizations

551
00:50:30,000 --> 00:50:35,120
truly know where AI solutions are being used whether that's a genticae or not I'm using the

552
00:50:35,120 --> 00:50:43,280
the term very very generally here it's a it's a case of understanding what what people are

553
00:50:43,280 --> 00:50:48,160
trying to do with AI in your organization and are you giving are you being proactive

554
00:50:48,160 --> 00:50:54,880
enough are you making sure that they understand the risks are you giving them that they are

555
00:50:54,880 --> 00:51:00,880
literacy training and are you putting those cardless card rails in place to to support them I think

556
00:51:00,880 --> 00:51:06,400
that's the main thing it's a lot of organizations I don't think have a good understanding right now

557
00:51:06,400 --> 00:51:13,680
what AI is being used were and that's a big big risk for organizations yeah also your day job your

558
00:51:13,680 --> 00:51:21,200
community involvement is extraordinary what organially inspired you to become so active in the

559
00:51:21,200 --> 00:51:29,120
Microsoft community I really enjoyed the first time I presented I was encouraged by my manager

560
00:51:29,120 --> 00:51:33,520
to submit a session at a conference for a solution a had built and I didn't think we get accepted

561
00:51:33,520 --> 00:51:37,200
in a million years because I didn't think anyone would find that interesting but I was wrong you

562
00:51:37,200 --> 00:51:44,320
got accepted so I I panicked because I might speak publicly quite a lot now now you can't get me

563
00:51:44,320 --> 00:51:50,000
to not jump on stage and talk about something but I used to be absolutely terrified of public speaking

564
00:51:50,000 --> 00:51:56,400
and when I tell people this now they don't believe it but I absolutely was and I and I very much

565
00:51:56,400 --> 00:52:01,760
was terrified of speaking the first time I did that conference and I think there's a YouTube video

566
00:52:01,760 --> 00:52:08,640
somewhere of me which I cannot bring myself to watch because someone recorded the session and it was

567
00:52:08,640 --> 00:52:14,480
you know I've come a long way since then the the reason why I I decided to do it that that first

568
00:52:14,480 --> 00:52:18,960
time I did it because I wanted to get over the fear of doing it quite honestly but the reason I

569
00:52:18,960 --> 00:52:25,440
continue to do it after that point was because it was great to hear people in the audience finding

570
00:52:25,440 --> 00:52:30,880
the information and the knowledge and my experiences that I shared useful it made the difference to

571
00:52:30,880 --> 00:52:36,640
them and I helped another person try to do something with the technology or understand the technology

572
00:52:36,640 --> 00:52:43,360
better and that's very rewarding when you see people actually really benefit from your experiences

573
00:52:43,360 --> 00:52:46,960
and it makes their lives easier and you get to have conversations with them afterwards and you

574
00:52:46,960 --> 00:52:52,160
learn something from them as well. I think that is very rewarding and also seeing other people in the

575
00:52:52,160 --> 00:52:56,480
community doing the same thing from their knowledge areas and as I said in the beginning speaking to

576
00:52:56,480 --> 00:53:01,280
them about the things they're doing and exchanging thoughts and opinions about where the technology is

577
00:53:01,280 --> 00:53:06,000
going the challenges they're facing in their roles but also meeting people that are in the same job

578
00:53:06,000 --> 00:53:11,680
as you are in a different organization and sort of comparing notes to a certain extent and realizing

579
00:53:11,680 --> 00:53:16,800
the challenges you face down a day to day you're not alone in this it's not just you there's other

580
00:53:16,800 --> 00:53:21,840
people out there facing the same challenges and there is a great thing about coming to get and

581
00:53:21,840 --> 00:53:29,440
discussing those and having that group therapy and them in love it but also at the same time discussing

582
00:53:29,440 --> 00:53:34,960
how do we change this how do we do this differently what can we use technology for how are you

583
00:53:34,960 --> 00:53:40,480
using AI in your day to day role and and having that exchange of knowledge and ideas I think that

584
00:53:40,480 --> 00:53:46,320
is extremely powerful and the opportunity that you get as well from from having that exposure from

585
00:53:46,320 --> 00:53:53,120
a network perspective from a career perspective can't be over estimated really I think it's it really

586
00:53:53,120 --> 00:54:01,600
does allow you to understand your role a lot more and the technology a lot at a much broader level

587
00:54:01,600 --> 00:54:05,920
than if you didn't become part of the community if you didn't attend those events it really helps

588
00:54:05,920 --> 00:54:13,600
you upskill and expand your network and really get a better a different perhaps if not better a

589
00:54:13,600 --> 00:54:19,760
different perspective of of the technology at the at the much broader level nothing that's very very

590
00:54:19,760 --> 00:54:26,080
very beneficial and that's why I attend events and that's why it's because events I I I remember my life

591
00:54:26,080 --> 00:54:31,760
before I was involved in the community and I can definitely tell you it's it's a much more enriched one

592
00:54:31,760 --> 00:54:38,000
now because you you make friendships as well within the community you can present with people together

593
00:54:38,800 --> 00:54:44,240
and you become a better professional as a result and I think that's you know it's it's great that

594
00:54:44,240 --> 00:54:51,440
the community exists I think we would be at all of us at a disadvantage if it didn't I think also

595
00:54:51,440 --> 00:54:57,680
one of the topics is mentorship you are in the yeah a moment in power platform can you tell a little

596
00:54:57,680 --> 00:55:06,480
bit about these yeah organization and also how important was mentoring for you in your career

597
00:55:07,920 --> 00:55:14,960
yeah absolutely I am very passionate about mentoring others because I I benefited from mentoring myself

598
00:55:14,960 --> 00:55:19,040
very early in my career and and as I said that wouldn't be in the position I mean now if someone

599
00:55:19,040 --> 00:55:23,840
hadn't really in a way mentored me unofficially and said no you should you know go for this off you go

600
00:55:23,840 --> 00:55:30,560
I am part of the women in power platform mentorship program so it is a a Microsoft initiative

601
00:55:30,560 --> 00:55:36,240
bringing women within the the power platform space together to mentor and support each other

602
00:55:36,240 --> 00:55:42,320
either on a one-to-one basis or on a group basis they run a cohort every quarter so you spend

603
00:55:42,320 --> 00:55:47,680
three months with your mentor or mentorship group and every every three months there is a new cohort

604
00:55:47,680 --> 00:55:53,760
basically it's very well organized by Danielle Moonin and Shravanis City and they do a great great

605
00:55:53,760 --> 00:55:59,200
work in terms of the mentorship program itself it's very well supported and there's a great love

606
00:55:59,200 --> 00:56:04,560
and appreciation for them and for all that they do it's it's very much a global global network

607
00:56:05,280 --> 00:56:10,400
on our own caradjian you body that's thinking about mentorship to submit an application once the

608
00:56:10,400 --> 00:56:15,040
the next cohort opens we're currently in the middle of a cohort finishing in a month or two

609
00:56:15,040 --> 00:56:22,000
all right so for me I would say mentorship is great if particularly when you're feeling stuck and you

610
00:56:22,000 --> 00:56:28,240
feel like you can't figure out a way you can't figure out the way through your next step you're not

611
00:56:28,240 --> 00:56:32,800
really sure what that right thing to do is it could be technically it could be from a career

612
00:56:32,800 --> 00:56:36,800
progression perspective it could be that you want to try something new but you're not really sure

613
00:56:36,800 --> 00:56:42,160
how to go about it it could be that you're looking for someone to help you get introduced to people

614
00:56:42,160 --> 00:56:47,520
or identify if even just talk talk to them about where you're at and try and figure out your blind

615
00:56:47,520 --> 00:56:53,920
spots or get that fresh perspective as to what you could do in my life I've been in a couple a

616
00:56:53,920 --> 00:56:58,080
couple of times bit stuck and I wasn't really sure where I wanted to go next and what I wanted to do

617
00:56:58,080 --> 00:57:02,160
and it's really helpful to talk to someone about where you're at because nothing

618
00:57:02,160 --> 00:57:06,960
itself can help you figure out the answer but sometimes you might not believe in yourself as much

619
00:57:06,960 --> 00:57:14,560
as someone else does and that might might it might help you have someone look at you as a person of

620
00:57:14,560 --> 00:57:18,960
unlimited potential you could do anything even if you don't believe you could do anything you could

621
00:57:18,960 --> 00:57:24,160
do anything and if you speak to someone who is a mentor who looks at you without unlimited potential

622
00:57:24,160 --> 00:57:30,720
they will say to you well okay you are here right now what if you aimed for insert crazy goal over

623
00:57:30,720 --> 00:57:35,520
here and they they might say I can't do that there's no way I could do it is about would you want to

624
00:57:35,520 --> 00:57:41,760
would you like to because you can and it's having that person believe in you and say to you you can do

625
00:57:41,760 --> 00:57:47,520
it I will support you if you want to do it do you want to do it and in having that guidance as well

626
00:57:47,520 --> 00:57:53,440
and not starting from zero having someone that can help you and use their experiences to to give

627
00:57:53,440 --> 00:58:00,560
you that knowledge of what lies ahead to a certain extent and and show you the common pitfalls and

628
00:58:00,560 --> 00:58:05,840
show you what's important and and help you through it and have that sounding board and for me I think

629
00:58:05,840 --> 00:58:10,400
everyone should at any point in their life have a mentor because I think if you if you don't you're

630
00:58:10,400 --> 00:58:15,680
you're missing that reflection but it but I think it's particularly important at moments in your

631
00:58:15,680 --> 00:58:22,960
life where you want to make a change or try something new or different you will know when you need

632
00:58:22,960 --> 00:58:26,720
it because something will be bugging you and you won't know what to do about it and I think mentorship

633
00:58:26,720 --> 00:58:32,880
is great for those moments but also finding the right mentor is key you need to to find someone who

634
00:58:32,880 --> 00:58:38,320
you trust and who understands you and who has the right experience to support in the thing you're

635
00:58:38,320 --> 00:58:42,720
trying to do and and that's what women in power platform is is great that they match mentors and

636
00:58:42,720 --> 00:58:48,160
mentees based on the knowledge of the mentor and what the mentees looking to get out of the

637
00:58:48,160 --> 00:58:55,440
mentorship cohort so that is very important as well yeah I think you do do so much all all all the other

638
00:58:55,440 --> 00:59:02,400
things but one with me really impressed is you are here in the UK delegation to the United

639
00:59:02,400 --> 00:59:08,960
Nation Commission on the status of women but well how is the status of the women actually?

640
00:59:08,960 --> 00:59:19,120
How is the status of the women not great? So the it is I've done this for three years now I've

641
00:59:19,120 --> 00:59:24,720
been part of the the the the participating the UK delegation for the the commission for the

642
00:59:24,720 --> 00:59:30,720
states of women for for three years in a row and it's it definitely is my my favorite and part of

643
00:59:30,720 --> 00:59:36,480
the year but also the one I dread the most because the topics that get discussed on women's experiences

644
00:59:36,480 --> 00:59:41,040
globally as you can imagine being the UN we don't really necessarily talk about just

645
00:59:41,040 --> 00:59:46,160
the the the areas where women are struggling but areas where women are really struggling and I'm

646
00:59:46,160 --> 00:59:56,560
talking about war conflict abuse it can get very very difficult to just to be in the room and listen

647
00:59:56,560 --> 01:00:03,200
to the issues that are that women are having to face we are very lucky and I always have a lot of

648
01:00:03,200 --> 01:00:10,960
gratitude for the life that myself as a woman in the UK has and I grew up in Greece I'm Greek originally

649
01:00:11,920 --> 01:00:18,080
I didn't have war and conflict in my life as a woman growing up and I believed in the the

650
01:00:18,080 --> 01:00:25,040
developed world all of my life when you contrast that to what life for a woman is in areas that have

651
01:00:25,040 --> 01:00:30,080
been plagued by war and conflict or their life and we're talking about young girls as well

652
01:00:30,080 --> 01:00:36,640
the horrors that they face they don't even enter our consciousness necessarily in Europe but they

653
01:00:36,640 --> 01:00:41,600
exist they happen all the time there's millions of them that are suffering and and that's what the

654
01:00:41,600 --> 01:00:47,760
commutions for the status of women is trying to to change it brings nations together to re in there's

655
01:00:47,760 --> 01:00:53,520
a different theme every year that they look to address so for example the theme this year was all about

656
01:00:53,520 --> 01:00:59,360
access to justice and legal systems and one of the things that was discussed was the fact that a lot

657
01:00:59,360 --> 01:01:03,360
of women in the world do not have access to justice in the first place let alone actually getting

658
01:01:03,360 --> 01:01:07,920
justice that's a whole different problem altogether so it's things that we don't even think about

659
01:01:07,920 --> 01:01:16,160
necessarily it's a very humbling experience but it's very it's a very I'm grateful to be part of it

660
01:01:16,160 --> 01:01:22,800
because aid gives me perspective it reminds me how lucky we are but it also reminds me how long

661
01:01:22,800 --> 01:01:31,440
we've got to go and I try to take what I learned from that into my role and trying to keep it moving

662
01:01:31,440 --> 01:01:40,240
forwards it's obviously a much bigger macro level government countries level event but it's all about

663
01:01:40,240 --> 01:01:45,440
taking taking those experiences back and identifying what I can do in my role in my organization

664
01:01:45,440 --> 01:01:52,320
in the initiatives I'm involved in to ensure that we have a better world for for women as well and

665
01:01:52,320 --> 01:01:58,640
you know I'm a mom and a six year old daughter I want to see progress made in my lifetime for her as well

666
01:01:59,600 --> 01:02:07,120
awesome yeah we're running a little bit out of time I ask you have you time for a rapid fire out

667
01:02:07,120 --> 01:02:16,800
yes go for it okay good coffee tea or energy drink coffee if you have to choose one two

668
01:02:16,800 --> 01:02:27,120
will dynamics 365 or power platform power platform remote work or home office remote work or office

669
01:02:28,000 --> 01:02:33,680
oh if I had to choose one it would be office because I love seeing people but ideally it would be

670
01:02:33,680 --> 01:02:42,400
50 50 okay and I don't know I will stress you but I do a conference the NC 65 quant but what's your

671
01:02:42,400 --> 01:02:50,800
failure but Microsoft event oh god I'm oh I'm gonna so I yeah so I obviously run my own user groups

672
01:02:50,800 --> 01:02:57,760
and conferences in the UK but I have to say the one that always has the the biggest place in my

673
01:02:57,760 --> 01:03:02,480
heart and I'm so sorry for all of the other ones that I'm involved in it's not that I love them any

674
01:03:02,480 --> 01:03:09,600
less just that from a location and weather wise the the one conference I love is dynamics mines because

675
01:03:09,600 --> 01:03:15,600
it makes me feel like I'm home almost because it's in it's expressed in Slovenia in May it's always

676
01:03:15,600 --> 01:03:22,880
lovely whether it's sunny it's organized to perfection by by the team behind it and it's a big

677
01:03:22,880 --> 01:03:27,920
conference it's it's great to be part of it and it's it's definitely my favorite one because it's a

678
01:03:27,920 --> 01:03:36,880
conference and the holiday all in one go one thing Microsoft showed published tomorrow oh

679
01:03:36,880 --> 01:03:41,760
a licensing guide that everyone can understand and you straightforward

680
01:03:41,760 --> 01:03:49,120
you're most used AI tool right now co-pilot

681
01:03:50,640 --> 01:03:59,120
one book you recommend to all technology leaders it's an old one but I think particularly relevant

682
01:03:59,120 --> 01:04:06,320
right now it's by Brad Smith from Microsoft he leads the legal teams within Microsoft and it's called

683
01:04:06,320 --> 01:04:12,000
tools and weapons and he was written almost 10 years ago I think from what mistaken and he talks a

684
01:04:12,000 --> 01:04:17,280
lot about artificial intelligence even back then and the fact that any technological advancement

685
01:04:17,280 --> 01:04:22,800
is a tool in the weapon and he talks about the challenges with introducing technology and

686
01:04:22,800 --> 01:04:29,040
from a Microsoft perspective the fact that sometimes they've even had to sue their own government

687
01:04:29,040 --> 01:04:34,240
for the things that they wanted to do with technology or the or the the requests by the government

688
01:04:34,240 --> 01:04:38,880
that went against privacy for example it's a very very interesting book particularly relevant

689
01:04:38,880 --> 01:04:44,640
still now because of where we are with AI and Brad Smith suggested that we should have a

690
01:04:44,640 --> 01:04:49,760
license for AI development and use the same way we do driving licenses for driving a car we don't

691
01:04:49,760 --> 01:04:53,360
allow people to drive a car without the license and that he suggested that perhaps we should

692
01:04:53,360 --> 01:04:58,000
introduce a license for creating developing using a knife so yeah very very good book

693
01:04:58,000 --> 01:05:02,720
your best piece of advice for some entering tech today

694
01:05:02,720 --> 01:05:11,680
you need to give it a try and you won't know everything he won't be perfect but what you need to

695
01:05:11,680 --> 01:05:18,000
do is just give it a go and keep going okay then then my last question if you could back and give

696
01:05:18,000 --> 01:05:25,840
your younger self one one piece of career advice what will it be don't work so hard to have some fun

697
01:05:25,840 --> 01:05:35,520
as well thank you Arti this was so much yeah enjoying it's most been fantastic hearing you

698
01:05:35,520 --> 01:05:41,600
about your journey from enterprise delivering leadership AI community building mentorship

699
01:05:41,600 --> 01:05:51,280
and the future of agente AI yeah for all listeners I put the links from on the show notes so they

700
01:05:51,280 --> 01:06:01,760
can find you so yeah thank you and have a nice day thank you for having a miracle love let's be here